-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Chris McDonough wrote:
>> I don't think "the ZTK" as defined by the historical constraints under
>> discussion here has much attraction for a large number of folks who are
>> otherwise willing to put effort into maintaining Zope packages.
>> For these folks, any reduction in number of dependencies and test
>> is a net win, because they just don't use the stuff they throw out, and they
>> don't have any Grok or legacy Zope3 apps in production to maintain that uses
>> this stuff either.
>> So maybe these folks should come up with their own "KGS" for whatever they
>> as a subset of "the ZTK". In particular, maybe Zope2 should just be based
>> this subset.
> I think the ZTK should be a smaller thing, but we need to find what that
> smaller thing is first. I agree with the general idea underlying this
> move, just not the way it was done, disclaiming responsibility.
> I'm quite sure that most of the zope.app.* packages that were dropped
> are just not very useful anymore. But we should drop them responsibly.
The maintainer who dropped them also went to a great deal of trouble to
ensure that the dependencies were fixed, and that what remains is a
coherent and usable set of the packages which used to be Zope3. Because
of his work, and that of others, the Zope2 trunk can now run against the
zope.app-free ZTK he created.
You need to identify whose ox is being gored here by dropping those
packages: I don't see anybody but you arguing for their inclusion. In
particular, I don't see anybody who knows *which* zope.app packages they
need, and has a credible argument for why those pacakges should be
maintained within the ZTK, rather than by the folks who actually use them.
If the ZTK is to be held hostage to a (nonsensical) BBB for nameless
users, I would be in favor of just copying Hanno's version of the ZTK
config into the Zope2 tree and have Zope2 ignore the ZTK per-se.
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -