On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Wichert Akkerman <wich...@wiggy.net> wrote: > It seems that you want to have a 'ZTK+' which aims to be backwards > compatible with Zope 3 but is somehow not Zope 3 itself. That is > something that not everybody appears to be interested in judging by the > lack of progress on Zope 3 itself, but if you want to pursue that I do > not see any reason for you not to do that. But it should separate from > the ZTK.
Agreed; the lean & mean ZTK is more interesting than this ZTK + zope.app construct. Creating a second known-good-set construct based on the ZTK and adding the selected zope.app package sounds like a straightforward task. It should be able to reuse the testing policies with little or no change. I agree with Martijn's desire for caution, however. This split should be done, but this is a split, not a simple removal of the zope.app packages without setting up this ZTK+ construct. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at gmail.com> "Chaos is the score upon which reality is written." --Henry Miller _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
