On 3/3/10 12:58 PM, Christian Theune wrote: > > I think there is some relevant and important desire that Chris has which > actually overlaps with some of thoughts I had lately: organizing the > currently 65 packages into categories where larger chunks of packages > make sense of being used together to socially encourage re-use doesn't > seem bad to me.
Yay. >> Or is Chris' characterization of my disagreement with him >> as "beating" negative feedback. This seems more appropriate to me, but >> I'm not sure what you mean. > > Hmm. I do understand why Chris responded that way, I'm not sure it had > to be in response to your post, but I guess that was because your post > came in second, otherwise it may have hit Martijn (yet again). But also > I'm not going to analyze Chris' feelings sitting over here in my room ... ;) "There's no crying in software" really, how I feel is irrelevant. ;-) I do wish every mention of change or even something just marginally outside the scope of what is normally discussed here wouldn't be quite as immediately and thoroughly stomped upon. I think it would be useful to have a discussion about grouping some Zope bits along functional lines for marketing purposes. This is really independent of any discussion about the ZTK. - C _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
