On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 15:40, Alexandre Garel <alex.ga...@tarentis.com> wrote:
> I'm a bit amazed by this argumentation. I think one important thing is that
> subversion is centralized while dvcs are not.
And I think it's very unimportant.
> With dvcs everyone got full history of zope libs. I personally find it a big
> pro for a free software.
You get that with svn too.
> More over with dvcs someone may fork a product on his side (a branch of his
> own, not on a zope server) and make it evolve, still having ability to merge
> updates (and auto merge in dvcs are superior to the one found in
You can do that with svn too. The merging of it is easier with
something like github or gitorious, but git in itself doesn't really
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -