On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 15:40, Alexandre Garel <alex.ga...@tarentis.com> wrote: > I'm a bit amazed by this argumentation. I think one important thing is that > subversion is centralized while dvcs are not.
And I think it's very unimportant. > With dvcs everyone got full history of zope libs. I personally find it a big > pro for a free software. You get that with svn too. > More over with dvcs someone may fork a product on his side (a branch of his > own, not on a zope server) and make it evolve, still having ability to merge > updates (and auto merge in dvcs are superior to the one found in > subversion). You can do that with svn too. The merging of it is easier with something like github or gitorious, but git in itself doesn't really help. //Lennart _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
