On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Charlie Clark
<charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu> wrote:
> Again, as Jens has repeatedly said we should not conflate the separate items
> of toolchain and service provider.


> Zope Foundation has hardware and a proven
> track record in hosting. Is anyone actually criticising this?

FTR, in the case of svn.zope.org, it's ZC hardware and hosting with a
lot of much appreciated help from Jens.

We're doing a pretty ok job (if you ignore a near catastrophe) in
providing what is, by today's standards, a bare-bones service.  User
management is awkward.  We lack any automated support for review, and
a number of other services provides by github and bitbucket.

svn.zope.org doesn't take much of my time most of the time, but it's
still a potential (and occasional real) time suck for me that I'd
love to jettison.

Life is short, why do this ourselves when there are excellent services


Jim Fulton
Jerky is better than bacon! http://zo.pe/Kqm
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to