On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 05:00:37PM +0200, Tonico Strasser wrote: | Philipp von Weitershausen schrieb: | >>>Ah, good. It wasn't at all clear that you actually supported the | >>>proposal :). | >> | >>Yes, if it's still possible to trigger HTML mode. But what about | >>backwards compatibility if we make XML the default mode? | > | >Well, the namespace stuff would probably account for a major breakage. | >Thus, over the span of two Zope releases, XML mode could be forgiveful | >when people forget to register namespace declarations. Of course, it | >would render deprecation warnings. | > | >I can't imagine a smooth transition for the other "features" of HTML | >mode because they are like on/off switches. Either you convert <br/> to | ><br /> or you don't. Same with <script ...></script> vs. <script ... /> | >and the other things. | | I ask because I don't know: if I serve a ZPT page in Zope 3 in XML mode, | which mime type is sent to the browser? Is this independent of the ZTP | XML/HTML mode?
As I just stated in the other subthread, I believe the HTTP Content-Type is (should be) independent of the "mode" the ZPT machinery uses to process the template. The <browser:page> directive or some other suitable explicit configuration should control the browser-specific items like content-type. I suppose maybe the publisher could add its two sense and handle IE and Mozilla differently presenting a facade to IE so it doesn't trip over itself and presenting the more-correct-by-the-spec information to Mozilla. -D -- If you want to know what God thinks about money, just look at the people He gives it to. -- Old Irish Saying www: http://dman13.dyndns.org/~dman/ jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3firstname.lastname@example.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com