On 1/24/06, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Shane Hathaway wrote: > > Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > > > >> However, I think one namespace for ZCML is enough.
Are you sure? Perhaps it's reasonable to use a single namespace for all the ZCML directives defined as part of the Zope 3 release. What about third-party directives? Are you saying we don't need to worry about introducing names that conflict with third-party names we don't know about? That sounds short-sighted to me. We've certainly defined several directives here at ZC, and I'd hate to have to push them all into Zope 3 itself just to ensure we don't end up with name conflicts in the future. > (and if we can get it down to one, we don't have to specify it at the > top of the file... yay!) If we're using XML+Namespaces, we have to specify it, regardless of the number of namespaces used. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at gmail.com> "There is no wealth but life." --John Ruskin _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3email@example.com Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com