On 1/24/06, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shane Hathaway wrote:
> > Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> >> However, I think one namespace for ZCML is enough.
Are you sure?
Perhaps it's reasonable to use a single namespace for all the ZCML
directives defined as part of the Zope 3 release. What about
third-party directives? Are you saying we don't need to worry about
introducing names that conflict with third-party names we don't know
That sounds short-sighted to me. We've certainly defined several
directives here at ZC, and I'd hate to have to push them all into Zope
3 itself just to ensure we don't end up with name conflicts in the
> (and if we can get it down to one, we don't have to specify it at the
> top of the file... yay!)
If we're using XML+Namespaces, we have to specify it, regardless of
the number of namespaces used.
Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at gmail.com>
"There is no wealth but life." --John Ruskin
Zope3-dev mailing list