On Tuesday 24 January 2006 11:29, Fred Drake wrote:
> > >> However, I think one namespace for ZCML is enough.
> Are you sure?
> Perhaps it's reasonable to use a single namespace for all the ZCML
> directives defined as part of the Zope 3 release. What about
> third-party directives? Are you saying we don't need to worry about
> introducing names that conflict with third-party names we don't know
> That sounds short-sighted to me. We've certainly defined several
> directives here at ZC, and I'd hate to have to push them all into Zope
> 3 itself just to ensure we don't end up with name conflicts in the
+1. I agree with Fred.
Also, I am refraining from commenting on this thread most of the time and wait
for a real proposal to comment on.
CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training
Zope3-dev mailing list