On Tuesday 24 January 2006 11:29, Fred Drake wrote: > > >> However, I think one namespace for ZCML is enough. > > Are you sure? > > Perhaps it's reasonable to use a single namespace for all the ZCML > directives defined as part of the Zope 3 release. What about > third-party directives? Are you saying we don't need to worry about > introducing names that conflict with third-party names we don't know > about? > > That sounds short-sighted to me. We've certainly defined several > directives here at ZC, and I'd hate to have to push them all into Zope > 3 itself just to ensure we don't end up with name conflicts in the > future.
+1. I agree with Fred. Also, I am refraining from commenting on this thread most of the time and wait for a real proposal to comment on. Regards, Stephan -- Stephan Richter CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student) Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3email@example.com Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com