Am Montag, 9. April 2007 00:13 schrieb Philipp von Weitershausen: > Hermann Himmelbauer wrote: > > A good solution would be to either making the error message more verbose, > > or to automatically omit such attributes in the formlib (which could also > > lead to other problems). > > -1 on automatic exclusion, that would be a bit magical. > > +1 on making the error message more verbose.
Yes, I agree with that. > It shouldn't be a lot of work to adjust the setUpWidgets and > setUpEditWidgets functions in zope.formlib.form to make > queryMultiAdapter() calls instead of getMultiAdapter(). Then in case of > a None return value (i.e. there's no widget), raise a WidgetLookupError > (a subclass of LookupError) with a proper error message. Sounds like a good solution. > This is a small enough task that would make an excellent first > contribution to Zope 3... any takers? :) Certainly interesting, but I'm still very new to Zope 3, so I'm unsure if I am qualified for this task. What if I check in code that accidentally breaks something? > * Write a test that exercises the desired behaviour, best by extending > the zope.formlib/form.txt doctest. (We require automated tests for all > modifications, especially for bugfixes and new features). This once again raises the question for me how I execute such tests (such as form.txt) - is there some magical Zope 3 command? Executing these tests via "debugzope" does not always work, probably something has to be set up beforehand? Best Regards, Hermann -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG key ID: 299893C7 (on keyservers) FP: 0124 2584 8809 EF2A DBF9 4902 64B4 D16B 2998 93C7 _______________________________________________ Zope3-users mailing list Zope3-users@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
