This isn't a good fix. The "path" of a URI isn't a filesystem path; it's a
specific part of a URI (see RFC 3986). The path portion of a URI cannot be
"absolute" or "relative". So it doesn't make sense to have this functionality
in the URI class.
fn:resolve-uri() is not supposed to accept a filesystem path, so the test case
path-to-uri.xq is not valid. If it DOES work on Unix as written, that's
probably a different bug.
I am commenting specifically on the fix to bug 868329. I have nothing to say
about the fix for bug 868325 except that it should probably be in a separate
Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba.
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders
Post to : email@example.com
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp