John Chambers writes:
>Actually, I've long done this, by simply using "+". But there are a
>couple of problems with this. One is that this is, with some
>
The problem---or one of the problems---is simmply that this isn't
good enough when you care how the output looks. (Not to mention that the
" " notation is way overloaded already...)
>When the !...! notation first came out, I thought that it would be a
>fix for these problems. "Great; now we have a way to correctly flag a
>bit of text as a musical annotation other than an accompaniment
>chord." But this hope was dashed when it became clear that people
>intend !...! to only allow things on a restricted list. I can't use
>
It clearly has to be expanded to take arguments.
Cheers,
John Walsh
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
