On 2007.10.01, Tom Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On the surface, the patch appears (as described) to do something like > ns_returnfile. All the patch does is to make a copy of the connection > and wrap the sock in a Tcl_Channel.
My only real concern about the change: What happens if you try to [ns_chan create] on the Tcl channel returned from [ns_conn channel]? Does the actual behavior line up with what one might normally expect (i.e., Policy of Least Surprise)? Is the behavior well-defined? -- Dossy -- Dossy Shiobara | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://dossy.org/ Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/ "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70) -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank.
