I agree partially with ending this thread, but not 100%. The thread still lives on as a discussion to see if having sub-renderers instantiated via the renderkit using renderer types is a desired improvement to the core renderers. If it is, there is an open discussion that Simon has addressed on how to customize the value of properties that a renderer uses from the FacesBean without using inheritance.
Tthat part of the thread has not reached a resolution, and although it may be viewed as a sub-thread, it still warrants further discussion and other view points. -Andrew On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 8:11 PM, Andy Schwartz > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ravi, All - > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Ravindra Adireddy > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Extending complex trinidad components like table, treeTable is complex > job > > > due to final, private and default access modifier methods in components > > > renderer and components class. > > > > > > > > > I am thinking that it is perhaps time to put this thread to rest. > > (It's been fun, but, hey, all good things come to an end, right?) > > seriously, I agree on that > > -M > > > > > > Perhaps we should follow Stephen's lead and start opening up new > > threads to discuss particular cases where improved extensibility is > > required. > > > > Ravi - would you mind starting a new thread to address the table > > extensibility question? > > > > Andy > > > > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > further stuff: > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org >
