The new thread has the subject: [Trinidad] Idea to register sub-renderers in the faces configuration.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll start a new thread though to clean up the email mess > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Andrew Robinson > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > There is already code in: > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/myfaces/trinidad/branches/ar_subRendererPerfTesting > > > > As for JIRA, I don't feel that that is a place for discussions. If a > > decision is made, then I will create an issue. > > > > -Andrew > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Perhaps you should file a JIRA ticket and give us a prototype so that > we can > > > discuss a more concrete example. > > > > > > Scott > > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew Robinson wrote: > > > > > > > I agree partially with ending this thread, but not 100%. The thread > > > > still lives on as a discussion to see if having sub-renderers > > > > instantiated via the renderkit using renderer types is a desired > > > > improvement to the core renderers. If it is, there is an open > > > > discussion that Simon has addressed on how to customize the value of > > > > properties that a renderer uses from the FacesBean without using > > > > inheritance. > > > > > > > > Tthat part of the thread has not reached a resolution, and although it > > > > may be viewed as a sub-thread, it still warrants further discussion > > > > and other view points. > > > > > > > > -Andrew > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 8:11 PM, Andy Schwartz > > > > > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ravi, All - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Ravindra Adireddy > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Extending complex trinidad components like table, treeTable is > > > complex job > > > > > > > due to final, private and default access modifier methods in > > > components > > > > > > > renderer and components class. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am thinking that it is perhaps time to put this thread to > rest. > > > > > > (It's been fun, but, hey, all good things come to an end, > right?) > > > > > > > > > > seriously, I agree on that > > > > > > > > > > -M > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps we should follow Stephen's lead and start opening up new > > > > > > threads to discuss particular cases where improved > extensibility is > > > > > > required. > > > > > > > > > > > > Ravi - would you mind starting a new thread to address the table > > > > > > extensibility question? > > > > > > > > > > > > Andy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > > > further stuff: > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
