Thanks. I think that would be best. :)
Andrew Robinson wrote:
I'll start a new thread though to clean up the email mess
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Andrew Robinson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is already code in:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/myfaces/trinidad/branches/ar_subRendererPerfTesting
As for JIRA, I don't feel that that is a place for discussions. If a
decision is made, then I will create an issue.
-Andrew
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps you should file a JIRA ticket and give us a prototype so that we can
> discuss a more concrete example.
>
> Scott
>
>
>
> Andrew Robinson wrote:
>
> > I agree partially with ending this thread, but not 100%. The thread
> > still lives on as a discussion to see if having sub-renderers
> > instantiated via the renderkit using renderer types is a desired
> > improvement to the core renderers. If it is, there is an open
> > discussion that Simon has addressed on how to customize the value of
> > properties that a renderer uses from the FacesBean without using
> > inheritance.
> >
> > Tthat part of the thread has not reached a resolution, and although it
> > may be viewed as a sub-thread, it still warrants further discussion
> > and other view points.
> >
> > -Andrew
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 8:11 PM, Andy Schwartz
> > >
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Ravi, All -
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Ravindra Adireddy
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > Extending complex trinidad components like table, treeTable is
> complex job
> > > > > due to final, private and default access modifier methods in
> components
> > > > > renderer and components class.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I am thinking that it is perhaps time to put this thread to rest.
> > > > (It's been fun, but, hey, all good things come to an end, right?)
> > >
> > > seriously, I agree on that
> > >
> > > -M
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Perhaps we should follow Stephen's lead and start opening up new
> > > > threads to discuss particular cases where improved extensibility is
> > > > required.
> > > >
> > > > Ravi - would you mind starting a new thread to address the table
> > > > extensibility question?
> > > >
> > > > Andy
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > further stuff:
> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
