On Feb 3, 2006, at 4:02 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
I saw that you've just setup SVN, and divided openEJB into 0, 1, 2 and 3.
Does the number suffix indicate the spec version to  be supported?

Exactly. Some better than other, but it is just for that (I asked Dave
about OpenEJB 0 and awaiting his answer on it).

On Feb 1, 2006, at 9:28 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Is there really a 0?

openejb0 has the code for all the following relases:

  v0_8_0
  v0_8_1
  v0_8_2
  v0_8_3
  v0_8beta1
  v0_8beta2
  v0_8beta3
  v0_9_0
  v0_9_1
  v0_9_2

They are all non-certified EJB 1.1. For a while we were basically donig 0.x+1 a year. Didn't plan it that way, just what happens when you start at 0.0 and attempt to countdown to 1.0. It was just the way we decided to do things at Exolab way back in 1999/2000.

-David


Reply via email to