On 11 Jul 2002, at 0:33, Mark D. Lew wrote: > At 11:42 AM 07/11/02, Richard Walker wrote: > > >Why the rush to pounce? > > I think the rush to pounce has something to do with your insistence on > coming on to the Finale list and telling us that Sibelius works better > than Finale does.
I have a hard time swallowing that, as I don't read Richard's comments as insisting anything of the sort. > If Sibelius is better suited to your needs, that's fine. All of us > here acknowledge that Sibelius is a good program and for many users it > is a more appropriate tool than Finale is. But those of us on this > group have found that, for at least some of our work, Finale is the > better choice for us. > > I know it's probably unintentional, but your posts frequently give the > impression that you're trying to persuade us that we've made the wrong > choice. I read his posts as an explanation of some of the things Sibelius does well, posted here as a way of pointing out what Finale might do better. The "rush to pounce" mystifies me -- it's as if people felt some kind of personal investment in Finale that causes them to view the slightest criticism of Finale as a criticism of themselves. -- David W. Fenton | http://www.bway.net/~dfenton David Fenton Associates | http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
