On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 16:45:36 +0200, Vladimir Nadvornik wrote: > Hi all, > > I have finally found some time to work on Geeqie again. The first obvious > task > is the 1.1 release. > > With Klaus we are discussing if we should base the 1.1 release on the > "master" > or "stable" branch. > In my opinion the "master" is better tested and the new features are quite > stable. Also, there are people waiting for the official release of the new > features. > > What are the other opinions?
Is anyone still processing the bug reports in the tracker? I've submitted a few patches there without getting any response. And while a few other issues have been discussed on this list, I wouldn't know what to expect from 1.1 compared with 1.0. Would 1.1 fix the major crasher reasons, such as "modifying the current working directory with an external tool can cause Geeqie to crash while refreshing its list of files"? It's been a long time since I've received a bug report about the Fedora package of Geeqie, but it's likely that this is due to the patches include in the package: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=geeqie.git;a=tree -- Fedora release 17 (Beefy Miracle) - Linux 3.4.6-2.fc17.x86_64 loadavg: 0.17 0.08 0.06 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Geeqie-devel mailing list Geeqie-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geeqie-devel
