Hi,
On Jul/27/2012, Omari Stephens wrote:
> On 07/27/2012 07:56 PM, Vladimir Nadvornik wrote:
> > Dne pátek 27 ??ervenec 2012 17:44:27 John Stoffel napsal(a):
> >>
> >> Can you give a summary of the differnces between the two branches?
> >> Maybe it would make sense to replace a 1.1beta patch release and a all
> >> the new features in a 2.0beta release so we cna look them over and see
> >> what's needed.
> >>
> >
> > stable/1.1 branch contains just some bugfixes
> >
> > master contains these features
> > - support for stereoscopic images
> > - rewritten file grouping - it no longer tries all uppercase combinations
> > - custom tiff loader - more efficient on large tiffs
> >
> > It is a long time since 1.0 release, I think that the distributions already
> > have their own fixes, so it makes no sense to do a pure bugfix release now.
>
> Release master. I've been using it also, and it's been stable for me
> as well. Call it whatever version number you like. Don't do any
> incremental releases before master.
same opinion here.
Release master. If there are regressions compared with 1.0: release
2.0.1 after it.
It doesn't seem that we have lot of man power to do too much releases,
I'd keep it simple...
--
Carles Pina i Estany
Web: http://pinux.info || Blog: http://pintant.cat
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Geeqie-devel mailing list
Geeqie-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geeqie-devel
