On 18/03/2016 22:37, waben...@gmail.com wrote: > Mick <michaelkintz...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Friday 18 Mar 2016 19:29:29 waben...@gmail.com wrote: >> >>> What I miss most of all is the fantastic konqueror. It was way >>> better than any other filemanager that I know. Of course I've >>> tested the KDE4 konqueror and also dolphin but it was horrible >>> compared to the old konqueror. Now I'm using thunar. It's far away >>> from being perfect, but it seems to be the lesser of the evils. ;-) >>> >>> -- >>> Regards >>> wabe >> >> I'm still using Konq rather than dolphin as a file manager and >> continue to be happy with it. :-) >> >> What's stopping you using it? > > It's some years ago and when I'm honest, I can't remember exactly > what displeased me. :-) > IIRC one thing was that the detailed view mode was not as compact > as it was with konqueror3. And there were some problems with the > theme (missing icons and some other glitches). And IIRC I also > missed some functions. > > Maybe I will try it again with KDE5. But this also depends on the > dependencies. :-) I'm not sure if I'm willing to install the complete > KDE environment for this test.
KDE 5 is absolutely nothing like KDE3. So by all means try it, but evaluate it on it's own terms. It's not a better KDE3, it's a whole different DE -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com