On 18/03/2016 22:37, waben...@gmail.com wrote:
> Mick <michaelkintz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Friday 18 Mar 2016 19:29:29 waben...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> What I miss most of all is the fantastic konqueror. It was way
>>> better than any other filemanager that I know. Of course I've
>>> tested the KDE4 konqueror and also dolphin but it was horrible
>>> compared to the old konqueror. Now I'm using thunar. It's far away
>>> from being perfect, but it seems to be the lesser of the evils. ;-)
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards
>>> wabe  
>>
>> I'm still using Konq rather than dolphin as a file manager and
>> continue to be happy with it.  :-)
>>
>> What's stopping you using it?
> 
> It's some years ago and when I'm honest, I can't remember exactly 
> what displeased me. :-) 
> IIRC one thing was that the detailed view mode was not as compact
> as it was with konqueror3. And there were some problems with the
> theme (missing icons and some other glitches). And IIRC I also 
> missed some functions.
> 
> Maybe I will try it again with KDE5. But this also depends on the 
> dependencies. :-) I'm not sure if I'm willing to install the complete
> KDE environment for this test.

KDE 5 is absolutely nothing like KDE3. So by all means try it, but
evaluate it on it's own terms. It's not a better KDE3, it's a whole
different DE


-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com


Reply via email to