On Mon, Sep 01, 2014, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > Peter, > > You've hit a lot of interesting sore spots for the software and for the > community. > > The truth of the matter is, LMMS has been in dire need of performance > enhancements for quite some time, some of which are slated to make it into a > future release that we are testing now (won't be available until after the 1.1 > series).
Thanks. That's good to know. Since it's an acknowledged issue, I won't be wasting time trying to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. It's a little sad, though. LMMS is so very, very good at what it's got right. I'd love to be able to use now rather than later. > Like many other free projects, the technical skills of the development staff > vary greatly and their availability varies even more. I hear you. I've been involved with a GNU project for years. Good coders with time to donate are sometimes just not available. > There are some very valid reasons for the major issues you've > described, but I'll let someone more technically involved than > myself answer those. One of which techical issues is that I doubt anyone expected lmms to be used the way I've been trying. :) <sigh> Back to linuxsampler and a gazillion virtual cables. Cheers. -- Peter Schaffter http://www.schaffter.ca ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/ _______________________________________________ Lmms-users mailing list Lmms-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-users
