>   Pluck on, Chris

We're all just "pluckers" in the grand scheme ... 
  Tom

Tom Draughon
Heartistry Music
www.heartistry.com
715-682-9362

Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 3, 2014, at 12:15 PM, Christopher Wilke <chriswi...@cs.dartmouth.edu> 
> wrote:
> 
> 
>   I think the real reason for the invention of the theorbo was to provide
>   easy fodder for an unending stream of juvenile phallic jokes. My
>   favorite was after a rehearsal for Monteverdi's Vespers. One of the
>   singers, a very attractive young lady, came up to me and said, "Oooooo,
>   that thing is ENORMOUS! I've been watching you and wondering, is it
>   true that a man who plays such a BIG, LONG instrument will also have a
>   HUGE..."
>   [Wait for it. Sexy, seductive eyes are being made at me.]
>   "...car trunk?"
>   I don't recall ever having been so simultaneously amused and
>   disappointed. Actually, that's not true. I have the identical feeling
>   when I see my paycheck after most gigs.
>   Pluck on,
>   
>   [1]Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad
> 
>     At Nov 3, 2014, 12:14:16, Mayes, Joseph<'[2]ma...@rowan.edu'> wrote:
> 
>   To find out why the theorbo was invented, you'd have to ask the
>   inventor:
>   Rube Goldberg
>   JM
>   On 11/3/14 11:56 AM, "Roland Hayes" <[3]rha...@legalaidbuffalo.org>
>   wrote:
>> I suggest its origins were for the solo singer to accompany himself
>   (Peri,
>> Caccini, others in Italy ca. 1600). Salamone Rossi calls for it in
>> instrumental dances very early, and it makes sense with one on a part
>   strings
>> - the chords and the basses plucked really stand out. From there to
>   the trio
>> sonata and competent continuo players being included along with
>   lutenists and
>> keyboardists in early productions, and a sort of tradition developed
>   despite
>> the many drawbacks you list, Chris.
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [4]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
>   [mailto:[5]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf
>> Of Christopher Wilke
>> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 11:41 AM
>> To: Geoff Gaherty; [6]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu; Martyn Hodgson
>> Subject: [LUTE] Re: Ren lute as sub for theorbo
>> 
>> Martyn,
>> 
>>> On Mon, 11/3/14, Martyn Hodgson <[7]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>> 
>>> If you believe the
>>> lute 'works well' and is 'quite audible' for
>>> continuo in ensemble, such as that
>>> required for a Bach harpsichord
>>> concerto, why do you think the theorbo was ever invented?
>> 
>> I've often wondered how the theorbo ever became a "thing" myself.
>   What an
>> improbably solution it offers for musical issues! And what an
>   awkward,
>> ungainly thing it is to master and use idiomatically! Strange
>   fingerboard
>> tuning... Limited melodic range... inability to double most vocal
>   lines for
>> support, especially when accompanying shaky singers... harmonic
>   register
>> placed in an undistinguished mid-range that is easily covered by
>   others in
>> even small groups... Campanellas are neat, but they take a lot of
>   additional
>> dedicated practice time to master and are virtually useless in
>   ensemble
>> playing other than in the most exposed passages. The basses, of
>   course, sound
>> great! They can be used to incredible effect - IF the bass line is
>   diatonic
>> for the tuning you happen to have during that section of the piece...
>   and
>> fairly slow moving... sans lots of leaps... without requiring a
>   surplus of
>> articulation... or too many ascending scalar passages that will
>   ring...
>> and you've also spent tons of time practicing to securely find your
>   way
>> through the forest of strings. (Know that the director will
>   invariably want
>> the theorbo to be the sole accompaniment instrument for the prima
>   donna's
>> passionate chromatic lament in B-flat minor at the opera's
>   heart-rending
>> denouement. He will announce this only as you're tuning up
>   immediately before
>> the opening show.) Volume is an asset. However, aside from the beauty
>   of the
>> open basses, the overall sound doesn't project especially well and so
>   is more
>> evident to the player than the listeners. It does look cool, however.
>> 
>> I speak as someone who has played a lot of theorbo. My very first
>   album was
>> dedicated to solo theorbo music. I still love the instrument and its
>> repertoire. However, considering all the time I've had to put into
>   becoming
>> competent and considering the challenges of the medium versus the
>> acceptability of then-current alternatives (i.e. Renaissance lute),
>   I've often
>> pondered why the ancients ever bothered to embrace this cranky beast
>   as
>> enthusiastically as they did. My guess is it caught on because it
>   looked cool
>> back then, too. ;-)
>> 
>> Chris
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Dr. Christopher Wilke D.M.A.
>> Lutenist, Guitarist and Composer
>> [8]www.christopherwilke.com
>> 
>> --------------------------------------------
>> On Mon, 11/3/14, Martyn Hodgson <[9]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> 
>> Subject: [LUTE] Re: Ren lute as sub for theorbo
>> To: "Geoff Gaherty" <[10]ge...@gaherty.ca>,
>   "[11]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu"
>> <[12]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
>> Date: Monday, November 3, 2014, 10:47 AM
>> 
>> If you believe the
>> lute 'works well' and is 'quite audible' for
>> continuo in ensemble, such as that
>> required for a Bach harpsichord
>> concerto, why do you think the theorbo was ever invented?
>> 
>> __________________________________________________________________
>> 
>> From: Geoff Gaherty <[13]ge...@gaherty.ca>
>> To: "[14]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu"
>> <[15]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
>> Sent: [16]Monday, 3 November 2014, 13:42
>> Subject: [LUTE] Re: Ren lute as sub for theorbo
>> On 2014-11-03, 8:18 AM, Christopher Wilke
>> wrote:
>>> Ren lute is absolutely fine. When I played in the Collegium at
>> Eastman,
>>> Paul (O'Dette)
>> occasionally sat in with us continuo players. He
>> always
>>> used his 8 course
>> I played continuo on my 7-course
>> renaissance lute for many years in a
>> baroque ensemble class at the Royal
>> Conservatory of Music in Toronto.
>> Although I own an archlute, the 7c was much more portable, easier to
>> play, and sounded just fine. Some
>> chords were awkward because of the
>> tuning, but otherwise it worked well, and was quite audible in our
>> ensemble of 5 or so. Heck, I even
>> played continuo in a Bach
>> harpsichord
>> concerto!
>> Geoff
>> --
>> Geoff Gaherty
>> Foxmead Observatory
>> Coldwater, Ontario, Canada
>> [1][17]http://www.gaherty.ca
>> [2][18]http://starrynightskyevents.blogspot.com/
>> To get on or off this list see list
>> information at
>> [3][19]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> References
>> 
>> 1. [20]http://www.gaherty.ca/
>> 2. [21]http://starrynightskyevents.blogspot.com/
>> 3. [22]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> To get on or off this list see list information at
>> [23]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> 
>   --
> 
> References
> 
>   1. https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/?.src=iOS
>   2. mailto:ma...@rowan.edu
>   3. javascript:return
>   4. javascript:return
>   5. javascript:return
>   6. javascript:return
>   7. javascript:return
>   8. http://www.christopherwilke.com/
>   9. javascript:return
>  10. javascript:return
>  11. javascript:return
>  12. javascript:return
>  13. javascript:return
>  14. javascript:return
>  15. javascript:return
>  16. x-apple-data-detectors://21/
>  17. http://www.gaherty.ca/
>  18. http://starrynightskyevents.blogspot.com/
>  19. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>  20. http://www.gaherty.ca/
>  21. http://starrynightskyevents.blogspot.com/
>  22. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>  23. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> 
> 


Reply via email to