On 18/02/2016 2:05 p.m., Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 17.02.2016 um 03:08 schrieb Andrew Parsloe:
Rather than try to explain things, I've attached two example documents
Uwe, one using ERT and one with a local layout that requires no ERT.
They show how to reference both a group of equations as a whole and the
subequations in the group.
Thanks.
But this was exactly my point: In Math.lyx the section describes
subequations, their labeling and their referencing. What you are doing
is to reference the outer equation. But if you don't want to reference
the subequations (as you do in your example file) why do you use
subequations then?
regards Uwe
It's possible we are talking about different things Uwe. Extracting the
example from 19.3 in the maths manual and compiling it separately, the
numbering in the pdf is (1), (1a), (1b), equation (1) being what you
mean by the outer equation (I assume). In my example documents there is
no outer equation. They are treated equally and so are numbered (1a) and
(1b). And yet I would still like to be able to refer to them
collectively as "the equations (1)". (I can imagine some discussion
like: "The answer to this question is contained in the equations (1). By
substituting from (1b) into (1a), ....")
The example documents do this, subnumbering the individual equations and
yet providing the means of referring to the group. There are references
of both kinds, to the individual equations as (1a), (1b), and to the
pair of them together as (1).
Andrew
Andrew
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
