"Normal" folk get a mac or a dell and dont build their own ;)

On Sunday, 24 January 2016, Greg Keogh <gfke...@gmail.com> wrote:

> That's what I was thinking.
>> Could be a return or similar.
>>
>> Was the box all sealed when you got it?
>>
>> I've had an issue with a mobo before where I couldn't boot it. It turned
>> out the bios version wasn't compatible with my ram, but  elevated version
>> was.
>>
>
> Hello from my new PC! As I type, I'm installing VS2015, which is a fragile
> experience because it seems to stall sometimes for hours, and I come back
> and do something like cancel the install or reboot, and it redraws the
> window and tells me it's finished okay. Some peculiar timing or rendering
> "bug" there perhaps, but I've just overlooked it and never bothered to
> search or ask about it.
>
> Everything seemed to be nicely sealed, so I certainly hope they were
> virgin parts. My friend did update the BIOS after he got the video working,
> but it just adds another layer to the confusion about what on earth caused
> the video to be initially dead.
>
> The video misery isn't over, as the mobo doesn't support the 2560x1440 of
> my DELL 2711 monitor and Whirlpool discussions explain all this and hint
> that I will certainly need a video card. The details are boring and
> depressing, but it's a tragedy that in this day and age I still have to use
> a separate video card (more parts and noise). I get the impression the
> standards about video aren't too standard.
>
> The weirdest things are happening though, like the EPSON scanner dialog
> pops-up and all of the text in the modal dialog are question marks ??????,
> so I guess there is some Unicode problem, but you can't make this shit up.
> My wife asked me "what do normal people do to get a new PC working
> properly", I said "I just don't know, I guess they finish up with a
> non-optimal partly working mess full of bloatware, toolbars, shortcuts,
> useless services and icons and they don't know any better". A strong
> argument for an iMac and the Apple Store and it's vetting process.
>
> *GK*
>

Reply via email to