Call it brand loyalty but I simply like Pentax... It cannot be blind faith since I started out with a Minolta SRT-101 (my dad's) when I was 7 years old, got my own Olympus PEN-EE when I turned 10, then a Canon Datematic for high school then finally getting my hands on the Spotmatic by my senior year. I flirted with a Canon AE-1 during college but traded that for a MX in the mid-1980s and stayed with Pentax ever since. Occasionally, I would 'visit' other brands whenever I can borrow friend's cams: Nikon FM10, Minolta 505si(?), NIkon F3, Nikon 6006 (or was it 6060?), Canon 1000Fn, Nikon D100, D70s and I did work for a studio that assigned a Minolta Dimage A1 and a Canon 20D for my use.
At the end of the day, with whatever real or perceived handicap or limitation that Pentax suffers from, I still like it. So there. PS The fact that Pentax bodies are assembled in the Philippines has nothing to do with it... On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 1:36 AM, Igor Roshchin <s...@komkon.org> wrote: > > In view of various comments from people about K-7 and K-x, I've been > thinking, - why am I shooting with Pentax? > This is a summary of my thoughts - I'd like to hear what others think > about this. > > In the past few weeks I realized that compared to other brand DSLR's > Pentax DSLRs (even the "flagman" K-7) has serious problems. > In crude terms: > 1. The AF sucks. > 2. The low-light performance sucks. > > 3. The P-TTL performance is inconsistent (I don't know how > I-TTL/E-TTL etc. are in that regard - any comments?) > > So, I was re-thinking my use of Pentax. > I started with ZX-5n back in 1997. The reason I chose it over Nikon > was that I didn't like ergonomics of N70/F70, and couldn't afford N90. > ZX-5n had incredible ergonomics, especially after coming from an > all-manual SLR (Kiev-19) where I could set everything blind-folded; > ZX-5n had all-analog knobs and buttons. > Despite lack of continuous AF that is found in Nikon models, > I enjoyed my ZX-5n greatly. > > When the time came to buy a DSLR, I thought if I should switch to > a Nikon, but decided to get *ist DS. And I've been rather happy with it > for over 4.5 years by now. > Yes, the low-light performance has been bothering me a lot, and > while until recently I didn't suffer much from the shortcomings of the > AF, - I just learned to work around it. > > In the last 2-3 years, I started taking photos at dance events, > and that's where quick and accurate AF matters, and low light > performance and an accurate flash are important. > So, why am I still using Pentax, and buying new bodies and lenses? > > While thinking about it, I recalled a very old joke about two worms. > A son and his father are seating in a pile of bull sh.. manure, and > talking: > -- Daddy, is it nice to live in that grove across the field? > -- Yes, son. > -- Daddy, is there plenty of food over there? > -- Yes, son. > -- Then why, daddy, we live in this pile of bull sh..? > -- Because that's our Motherland. > ... > > > I still like Pentax. > I don't like at all the consumer line of Canons (Rebels etc.). > I seem to like mid-line of Nikon's circa 2005-2008 but have almost > no idea about their more recent (and higher) models. > I've been looking at Panasonics that are highly regarded by some > PDMLers, but I am not sure if they have that good AF and low-light > performance. > > As for Pentax, I am currently evaluating if I should exchange the K-7 > for a K-x for a better low-light performance. > > I just got a K-x that I will try "in action" during the weekend. > My first impression of a K-x is that functionality- and layout-wise, > it is very reminiscent of the DS. But I was rather disappointed by the > lack of the small top status display. > I don't mind the versitality of the AA's (I use them for the flash > anyway). > K-x is lighter, but compared to K-7 the feel a bit plasticy; > more so than that for DS. > I like that the choice of the AF mode, ISO and exponometry mode > in the K-7 is done by physical switches, not via the menu. > > > I would be glad to hear what others have to say about these thoughts. > > Igor > > PS. The obvious short response "BS" is not accepted. ;-) > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Bong Manayon http://www.bong.uni.cc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
