It's simple - Canon consumer cameras (especialy their user interfaces)
do suck even more and we can not afford comparable piles of Nikkor
glass. Olympus is no-no. Sony has all the same "sucking problems" as
Pentax does plus some extra. Also, we already happen to have Pentaxes
and as all those brand-changes are simply a form of financial suicide,
we take pictures with 'em. The most surprising part is, that we don't
take any less GOOD pictures than C, N, O or S owners (at least I don't
get less good shots with my K20D than all those fancy otherbranders and
darksiders that I review every month).
BR, Margus
Igor Roshchin wrote:
In view of various comments from people about K-7 and K-x, I've been
thinking, - why am I shooting with Pentax?
This is a summary of my thoughts - I'd like to hear what others think
about this.
In the past few weeks I realized that compared to other brand DSLR's
Pentax DSLRs (even the "flagman" K-7) has serious problems.
In crude terms:
1. The AF sucks.
2. The low-light performance sucks.
3. The P-TTL performance is inconsistent (I don't know how
I-TTL/E-TTL etc. are in that regard - any comments?)
...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
