Tom, Your comments strike a chord with me. I've owned Pentax gear since starting with an ME in 1978. By 1993, I had purchased several lenses (M's) but only my 3rd body, a PZ-1. That was 3 bodies in 15+ years and skipping multiple generations.
Then came digital... I resisted until GFM and then ordered a *istDS on the ride back home. Then I jumped on the leading edge with a K-10 followed by a K-20, then a K-7. Pentax made more money from my recent camera purchases than lenses. I keep on chasing the latest technology to their profit. Would I like a FF camera? Absolutely! I still pick up an LX or MX and look thru the viewfinder. The picture is wonderful, big, bright, and very desirable. I will pay money to get back to that... And to have my wide angle lenses back! Regards, Bob S. On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Tom C <caka...@gmail.com> wrote: > You're correct in that I haven't moved on from Pentax yet, largely > because 1) everytime I consider it I must also factor in new lenses, > and 2) everytime I consider it I must also factor in the cost for new > lenses. > > My affinity for Pentax, despite my misgivings, is evidenced by the > fact that I've purchased 4 of their DSLR's, 2 APS-C lenses, an > expensive Sigma long zoom in K-mount, and that I continue to display > images made with that gear. I believe I've every right to voice a > negative opinion on some aspect of Pentax as I've paid for that right. > Tom C. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.