said I:
> >BTW, I still want to know what the alternative is to scientific
> >(logical-empirical) thinking.
Carl:
> I'd say intuition, but that's only a hunch :)
ha!
of course, contrary to scientistic/positivistic propaganda, intuition is part of science. What was Einstein, if not intuitive? (I'm told that his math wasn't very good.) Scientists use their intuition all the time. But then the products of intution that can't be validated logically or empirically fall by the wayside.
Jim
