On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Marcel Kilgus wrote: > This would result in a complete mess. The semantic of a keyword > depending on the order in which the extensions are loaded, no thanks. > The easy and better solution is to just always add a prefix. But this > is nothing one can (or should) enforce. A nice mail to the toolkit > author might already be enough. I can see how it would lead to the IFDEF nightmares of C... However, I did say that's how *I* would solve the problem and this is incorrect. It would solve a symptom of the problem. The problem is that the OS extensibility is too flexible, and allows toolkits to trample and interfere with each other. imvvvho. Dave
