>Wolfgang writes: > >I've read this thread about names clashes in toolkits etc. >with quite some interest. <> >3 - As a guideline, perhaps authors of future toolkits might >want to envisage that they should, indeed, preface their >extensions with, say, their initials, such as WL_ASEARCH >instead of ASEARCH etc. > >This depends, of course, on your cooperation, but it might >make future clashes less likely. > >What do you think?
Toolkits will often be grouped for special purposes, such as array manipulation, string parsing, or to manipulate some low-level object (such as a database or timer, etc). Wouldnt it be more logical and aesthetically pleasing to use prefixes such as MAT_, STR_, DB_, CLK_, etc rather than WL_ or PJW_ ? Per
