Don,

You may want to do a search of the FCC's website for infractions and the 
like;  as I remember a number of years ago the FCC shut down a pirate 
broadcast station somewhere in the U.S. and the person that was involved was 
a ham.

I'm not sure of the final disposition of the case, but I do remember reading 
somewhere that the FCC was trying to pull both his commercial and ham 
license as a part of the punishment process.

Hope this helps,

Don, KD9PT

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Don" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2008 5:58 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Registered Sex Offenders


> Hello I hope Everyone is doing Well , Some things We do not like
> talking about Except with  our Ham friends Privately  and I am sure
> My Topic is one that may effect all of us
>
> But I have a Question and I have got a lot of Opinions , But I Need
> to know if Anyone Has the Real answer and can Give ,Me the FCC Rule
> Etc
>
> A group of us are aware of a Couple Registered Sex Offenders who are
> Lic
> Ham Radio operators, They use some of the Local Repeaters . And have
> Engages in conversations with Lets say Younger Ham radio Operators,
> Boy
> Scouts, little league Etc
>
> We would like to Know is there is a FCC Ruling against Them still
> Holding and using a Valid Amateur Radio Lic
>
>  I know this question will cause a Frenzy of comments, But I am sure
> others would like to know to So lets keep the answers and comments
> Civil. All of also know with the homeland Security some clubs have
> been
> given funds for Equipment and Training,
>
> I would hate for an Incident Come up because of the above Question,
> normally in Life changes are not made until something bad happens.
>
> PS I have a Repeater on 440 and 220 do I flip the big switch on  them
> I am not judging Innocent or Guilt that will be done in a higher
> place
>
> 73 De Don KA9QJG
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
> !DSPAM:1016,489e213e166556296837845!
>
> 


Reply via email to