Make the WISP secondary to the primary user which would be your  repeater or 
any future amateur projects. No interference or they have to abandon the site. 
Take their money if it works out, lose the money if they cause problems and 
terminate the contract.

Mike
WBØGOA

--- On Wed, 1/21/09, AJ <aj.grant...@gmail.com> wrote:
From: AJ <aj.grant...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] 900 MHz WISP on repeater tower?
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2009, 3:41 PM










    
            And scratch out the chance of ever making friends with any other 
amateur in the area that has deployed, or is thinking of deploying, a 902 MHz 
ham repeater... The 900 MHz ISM crap makes the 902 Amateur band in a lot of the 
country almost unusable...

 
We actually had a WISP removed from our site due to the noise floor they 
stirred up with their "certified" Motorola gear... Right of first refusal is 
rather helpful in these cases.
 
73s,
 
AJ, K6LOR


On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Mike Lyon <mike.l...@gmail. com> wrote:






Find out what gear they are using. Make sure it's FCC certified. If you have a 
spectrum analyzer, or have access to one, have them fire up the gear and make 
sure it doesn't have any spurious spikes within the 440 and 2m ham band.


-Mike 




On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Paul N1BUG <paul_n1...@verizon. net> wrote:






I could use a little help here. I have a repeater tower with 2 meter 
and 440 repeater on it. I have been contacted by a wireless internet 
service provider about putting some 900 MHz stuff on my tower. The 

deal they are offering is attractive but I'm wondering if there 
would be interference issues between their stuff and my repeaters. 
I'm going to be setting up a meeting to discuss technical aspects of 
the proposed system, but I have no experience or knowledge in this 

area and am not sure what questions I should be asking them. Any 
suggestions or advice?

Thanks!

Paul N1BUG



 


      

    
    
        
         
        
        








        


        
        


      

Reply via email to