K:none is already defined in the ABC 2.0 draft spec, although there's a
slight ambiguity in that spec, since none is also shorthand for
clef=none. When I implemented that section of my parser, I resolved that
in favor of the key, and required the full clef=none if you want no clef.
K: by itself
On 19 Aug 2004, at 16:37, Steven Bennett wrote:
K: by itself is not documented in ANY version of the ABC spec as a
valid
sequence, and cannot be assumed to work in any program. In my own
parser,
again, that would cause an error on the field, which would cause the
field
to be ignored (in an
Steven Bennett writes:
| K:none is already defined in the ABC 2.0 draft spec, although there's a
| slight ambiguity in that spec, since none is also shorthand for
| clef=none. When I implemented that section of my parser, I resolved that
| in favor of the key, and required the full clef=none if
John Chambers wrote:
Steven Bennett writes:
| K:none is already defined in the ABC 2.0 draft spec, although there's a
| slight ambiguity in that spec, since none is also shorthand for
| clef=none. When I implemented that section of my parser, I resolved that
| in favor of the key, and
Steven Bennett wrote:
| I believe I decided that T: was a valid title field as well -- some pieces
| simply don't have a title.
Yes; I have a number of examples where I don't want a title. Mostly
they're musical fragments, or things like a blank manuscript page.
OTOH, one thing my Tune Finder
| I believe I decided that T: was a valid title field as well --some
|pieces simply don't have a title.
Yes; I have a number of examples where I don't want a title. Mostly
they're musical fragments, or things like a blank manuscript page.
None none and Gan Ainm are legal titles, (And not
consider extending the K: to allow K:none?
What tune has no key signature? I'm confused.
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
On 18 Aug 2004, at 08:07, Atte André Jensen wrote:
Hi
Some tunes are not in any specific key, but it seems abc doesn't have
any way to notate this. If I use K:C the song is shown correctly, but
this opviously is corrupted when transposing it.
Is there a solution withinn the current abc
Phil Taylor wrote:
On 18 Aug 2004, at 08:07, Atte André Jensen wrote:
snip
should we consider extending the K: to allow K:none?
It has been suggested before, and seems not unreasonable.
Ok, so how to proceed?
Transposition routines would have to be re-written to deal with it though.
Currently
Atte asked:
| Some tunes are not in any specific key, but it seems abc doesn't have
| any way to notate this. If I use K:C the song is shown correctly, but
| this opviously is corrupted when transposing it.
|
| Is there a solution withinn the current abc definition that I overlooked
| or should we
10 matches
Mail list logo
