Re: [asterisk-users] DAHDI and B410P (BRI)

2009-03-10 Thread Andrew Thomas
I have LibPri installed and working (.../wPRI). So, if I understand Tzafrir correctly - DAHDI support for the B410P isn't available in 1.4 at all. Looks like I'm going back to mISDN. Cheers Andy -- -Original Message- -- From:

Re: [asterisk-users] MoH - always starting from the beginning

2009-03-10 Thread Andrew Thomas
You could always run a shoutcast server and stream from that.     -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Mike Sent: 09 March 2009 19:02 To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'

[asterisk-users] Hold/Resume issue with polycom

2009-03-10 Thread Max Alex
Hi All, We have working pbx with asterisk 1.4.23.1 System: Centos 5.2 We are using polycom phones for pbx. We are using sip channels for calls and all the users has set canreinvite=no and nat=yes. We have a issue with resuming the hold call by the polycom phone when the call traffic is high. We

Re: [asterisk-users] Cdr problem

2009-03-10 Thread Anthony Francis
Tilghman Lesher wrote: On Monday 09 March 2009 01:28:49 pm Anthony Francis wrote: Tilghman Lesher wrote: On Friday 06 March 2009 11:24:46 pm Hooman Peiro wrote: hi, I'm working with asterisk on a project and I found a problem with cdr_odbc. As we know, after answering each call

Re: [asterisk-users] Portech MV3770 Caller-ID

2009-03-10 Thread Sasa
Hi, I have modified in Mobile/Setting the parameter SIP From from tel/user to tel/tel and now I view the correct incoming number. Thanks. -- Salvatore. - Original Message - From: Christian Victor christ...@victormedia.de To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial

Re: [asterisk-users] Fwd: add a new queue strategy: SBR

2009-03-10 Thread nik600
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 4:01 AM, James Sneeringer jsnee...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 5:44 PM, nik600 nik...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks, i've tested and it works (1.4.23.1). Just 2 questions: 1) this approach seems to be an hack and not the implementation of a feature is it really

Re: [asterisk-users] I can't receive fax

2009-03-10 Thread Doug Lytle
fateme fatah wrote: thank you Dear doug But,I don't have any file in /var/spool/hylafax/log directory. Sorry, I didn't see that you installed from RPM. To find out where FC installs the files to, do the following: updatedb -e /home (Updates the 'locate' database and excludes the home

[asterisk-users] Calling id problem on outgoing call

2009-03-10 Thread Artifex Maximus
Hi all! On outgoing call sometimes Asterisk use/give back the caller id sent back by called number instead of number called by me. This is annoying and misleading statistics if other side use some exotic number. For example I have called number 12345678 and CDR include the number 333 as callerid

Re: [asterisk-users] Cdr problem

2009-03-10 Thread Hooman Peiro
thanks for your responses, I checked again and I found that I asked a wrong question! I was supposed to ask about answer time. The answer time is not getting save in the database. On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Anthony Francis antho...@rockynet.comwrote: Tilghman Lesher wrote: On Monday

[asterisk-users] Asterisk and WebIntegration

2009-03-10 Thread Kurian Thayil
Hi All, Is there a way that I can include call dialing functionality in a webinterface. I have EyeBeam configured with a SIP user say 8440. Will I be able to design an inteface which agent can choose a number and the Dial without punching in the number in Eyebeam. I tried using the .call file. ie

[asterisk-users] How to do Load-Balancing for Asterisk with OpenSIPS

2009-03-10 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Hi, When trying to cluster Asterisk boxes to gain scalability and more performance, there is now a new simple and efficient solution for doing it. OpenSIPS/OpenSER 1.5 can now implement traffic routing based on load. Shortly, when OpenSIPS routes calls to a set of destinations, it is able to

Re: [asterisk-users] How to do Load-Balancing for Asterisk with OpenSIPS

2009-03-10 Thread Ali Jawad
Great Job Bogdan On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu bog...@voice-system.ro wrote: Hi, When trying to cluster Asterisk boxes to gain scalability and more performance, there is now a new simple and efficient solution for doing it. OpenSIPS/OpenSER 1.5 can now implement

[asterisk-users] in which asterisk version is zaptel removed?

2009-03-10 Thread Vieri
Hi, It's not clear to me which asterisk version drops support for zaptel in favor of dahdi. Dahdi and zaptel can coexist in some 1.4 versions but it seems that from 1.4.22 onward, chan_zap.so is not built. Documentation within the 1.4.23.1 tarball indicates that one can keep using the

[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6, B410P and TE/PtmP mode. Could you get it running ?

2009-03-10 Thread Olivier
Hi, My setup is: IPPhone1 --- Asterisk1 with B410P Patton 4638 --- Asterisk2 --- IPPhone2 I want to evaluate Asterisk1 in TE/PtmP mode. So, Patton box is configured in NT/PtmP (with 3 BRI links between both systems). Anyway, asterisk -rx pri show spans keeps replying : PRI span 1/0:

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and WebIntegration

2009-03-10 Thread Steve Totaro
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Kurian Thayil kurianmtha...@gmail.comwrote: Hi All, Is there a way that I can include call dialing functionality in a webinterface. I have EyeBeam configured with a SIP user say 8440. Will I be able to design an inteface which agent can choose a number and

Re: [asterisk-users] in which asterisk version is zaptel removed?

2009-03-10 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 04:04:41AM -0700, Vieri wrote: Hi, It's not clear to me which asterisk version drops support for zaptel in favor of dahdi. In 1.6.0 . Dahdi and zaptel can coexist in some 1.4 versions but it seems that from 1.4.22 onward, chan_zap.so is not built.

[asterisk-users] Update chan_dahdi.conf doc in voip-info.org

2009-03-10 Thread Olivier
Hi, It seems BRI signalling settings are missing from http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+config+chan_dahdi.conf I would like to add those parameters : bri_cpe_ptmp bri_cpe bri_net Is this http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+config+chan_dahdi.conftied to a specific Asterisk

Re: [asterisk-users] Update chan_dahdi.conf doc in voip-info.org

2009-03-10 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 01:51:27PM +0100, Olivier wrote: Hi, It seems BRI signalling settings are missing from http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+config+chan_dahdi.conf I would like to add those parameters : bri_cpe_ptmp bri_cpe bri_net Is this

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and WebIntegration

2009-03-10 Thread Kurian Thayil
Hi Steve, That worked beautifully. Thank you so much. But one question though. Imagine if I keep a Hangup Button in the interface and it should terminate the call. Will that be possible? This scenario happens when the user gets connected to an invalid phone number where the user have to manually

Re: [asterisk-users] Portech MV3770 Caller-ID

2009-03-10 Thread Christian Victor
2009/3/10 Sasa s...@shoponweb.it Hi, I have modified in Mobile/Setting the parameter SIP From from tel/user to tel/tel and now I view the correct incoming number. Thanks. Glad I could help. It took me nearly a month to figure that out. ;-) Chris

Re: [asterisk-users] Update chan_dahdi.conf doc in voip-info.org

2009-03-10 Thread Olivier
2009/3/10 Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 01:51:27PM +0100, Olivier wrote: Hi, It seems BRI signalling settings are missing from http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+config+chan_dahdi.conf I would like to add those parameters : bri_cpe_ptmp

Re: [asterisk-users] Update chan_dahdi.conf doc in voip-info.org

2009-03-10 Thread Andrew Thomas
Don't forget to mention that the BRI signalling method doesn't work in 1.4 (and probably 1.2) ;). Andy   -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Olivier Sent: 10 March 2009 12:51 To: Asterisk Users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and WebIntegration

2009-03-10 Thread Geraint Lee
If you're using a php i'd take a look at phpagi - there are others around for various different languages too. our agents use twinkle with auto-answer, the only reason they need to look at twinkle is if they need to perform a transfer (that too will soon be done from the web browser), you can do

[asterisk-users] Voxli

2009-03-10 Thread Dean Collins
Came across this today http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/09/y-combinators-voxli-targets-gamers- with-browser-based-group-voice-chat/ Yet another opportunity Asterisk http://www.digium.com/ / Mexuar http://www.mexuar.com/ / PhoneFromHere http://www.phonefromhere.com/ / (insert the other

[asterisk-users] configuring channels for dahdi

2009-03-10 Thread Aqua Man
after installing asterisk 1.4.23.1 and dahdi-linux-2.1.0.4 and at CLI module load chan_dahdi.so receive the following: signalling must be specified before any channels are. CLI Warning [4663]: chan_dahdi.c:11627 process_dahdi: Ignoring signalling Error[4663]: chan_dahdi.c:10946

[asterisk-users] Compiling OSLEC in Dahdi w/ Intel Optimizations

2009-03-10 Thread Joseph L. Casale
I am about to setup a new machine and based on a thread in the freetel-oslec list, I came across the idea of compiling Intel optimizations in when using oslec w/ dahdi. So I edit dahdi-linux-complete-2.1.0.4+2.1.0.2/linux/drivers/dahdi/dahdi_config.h to #define CONFIG_DAHDI_MMX which on its own

[asterisk-users] Sending faxes with T.38 problem. Asterisk - 1.6.0.6

2009-03-10 Thread Santiago Gimeno
Hello, I'm having difficulties to make Asterisk (1.6.0.6) interoperate correctly with a CISCO mediaGW in order to send faxes to the PSTN using T.38. When Asterisk sends the initial INVITE containing the T.38 media offer in the SDP, the CISCO answers with a 488 Not Acceptable Media. Apparently,

Re: [asterisk-users] configuring channels for dahdi

2009-03-10 Thread Dave Fullerton
Aqua Man wrote: after installing asterisk 1.4.23.1 and dahdi-linux-2.1.0.4 and at CLI module load chan_dahdi.so receive the following: signalling must be specified before any channels are. CLI Warning [4663]: chan_dahdi.c:11627 process_dahdi: Ignoring signalling

Re: [asterisk-users] Update chan_dahdi.conf doc in voip-info.org

2009-03-10 Thread Olivier
2009/3/10 Andrew Thomas a...@datavox.co.uk Don't forget to mention that the BRI signalling method doesn't work in 1.4 (and probably 1.2) ;). Is it me or is it not either mentioned in chan_dahdi.conf after a make samples ? (grep BRI /etc/asterisk/chan_dahdi.conf returns nothing) Is it

Re: [asterisk-users] Compiling OSLEC in Dahdi w/ Intel Optimizations

2009-03-10 Thread Olivier
2009/3/10 Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com I am about to setup a new machine and based on a thread in the freetel-oslec list, I came across the idea of compiling Intel optimizations in when using oslec w/ dahdi. So I edit dahdi-linux-complete-2.1.0.4+

Re: [asterisk-users] configuring channels for dahdi

2009-03-10 Thread Andrew Thomas
Post up your chan_dahdi.conf and we'll fix it :) Hint - you are missing : 'signalling = fxo_ks' and 'signalling = fxs_ks' from it.  -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Aqua Man Sent: 10 March

Re: [asterisk-users] dahdi wcb4xxp and fax

2009-03-10 Thread Olivier
2009/2/27 Matthew Fredrickson cres...@digium.com I have a couple of suggestions: Make sure that your timing configuration is correct in /etc/dahdi/system.conf (that it has a valid timing source). Also, you probably will probably want to use the half_full buffer policy, and set the number

Re: [asterisk-users] dahdi wcb4xxp and fax

2009-03-10 Thread Olivier
2009/2/27 Matthew Fredrickson cres...@digium.com I have a couple of suggestions: snip Olivier wrote: 2009/2/25 stoffell stoff...@gmail.com mailto:stoff...@gmail.com Hi all, I wanted to switch from my current setup (mISDN) to the native dahdi with b410p support

Re: [asterisk-users] Sending faxes with T.38 problem. Asterisk - 1.6.0.6

2009-03-10 Thread David Backeberg
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Santiago Gimeno santiago.gim...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I'm having difficulties to make Asterisk (1.6.0.6) interoperate correctly with a CISCO mediaGW in order to send faxes to the PSTN using T.38. Is it possible to make Asterisk work like this? yes, as I've

Re: [asterisk-users] work around the 64 pickupgroups limit

2009-03-10 Thread Klaus Darilion
Benny Amorsen schrieb: Klaus Darilion klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at writes: What are the typical ways to work around the 64 groups limit? a) Split into different Asterisks b) Use directed pickup instead, not *8 Maybe we should change the groups from a bitmask to an AST_LIST regards

Re: [asterisk-users] Sending faxes with T.38 problem. Asterisk - 1.6.0.6

2009-03-10 Thread Joshua Colp
- Santiago Gimeno santiago.gim...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I'm having difficulties to make Asterisk (1.6.0.6) interoperate correctly with a CISCO mediaGW in order to send faxes to the PSTN using T.38. When Asterisk sends the initial INVITE containing the T.38 media offer in the SDP,

[asterisk-users] 1.4.23 + Realtime Queues/Agents NOT via SIP

2009-03-10 Thread Peter Beckman
I'm working on a project that involves Queues with Agents that are at home with a PSTN phone number, NOT connected via SIP phones. In the queues.conf it clearly states that only the SIP driver supports In Use detection of making members of a Queue available or unavailable. I've not yet figured

Re: [asterisk-users] Sending faxes with T.38 problem. Asterisk - 1.6.0.6

2009-03-10 Thread Joshua Colp
- Santiago Gimeno santiago.gim...@gmail.com wrote: **The call-file I'm using is: Channel: SIP/08099...@outbound- calls MaxRetries: 3 WaitTime: 30 Set: LOCALSTATIONID=2 Set: LOCALHEADERINFO=T38 fax Set: T38CALL=1 Set: T38TXDETECT=yes CallerID: 2 Context: fax-out

Re: [asterisk-users] work around the 64 pickupgroups limit

2009-03-10 Thread Klaus Darilion
Benny Amorsen schrieb: Klaus Darilion klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at writes: What are the typical ways to work around the 64 groups limit? b) Use directed pickup instead, not *8 So I would have to implement privileges (who is allowed to pick up whose calls) manually - not easy klaus

Re: [asterisk-users] Sending faxes with T.38 problem. Asterisk - 1.6.0.6

2009-03-10 Thread David Backeberg
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Joshua Colp jc...@digium.com wrote: - Santiago Gimeno santiago.gim...@gmail.com wrote: This was filed as an issue and is being tracked at http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12437. Thus far I have created a branch for Asterisk 1.4 that changes the behavior

Re: [asterisk-users] Compiling OSLEC in Dahdi w/ Intel Optimizations

2009-03-10 Thread Joseph L. Casale
Why does enabling the mmx in dahdi_config.h break compilation? I get the following: {standard input}: Assembler messages: {standard input}:86: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov' {standard input}:87: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov' make[3]: ***

Re: [asterisk-users] Sending faxes with T.38 problem. Asterisk - 1.6.0.6

2009-03-10 Thread Benny Amorsen
Joshua Colp jc...@digium.com writes: This was filed as an issue and is being tracked at http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12437. Thus far I have created a branch for Asterisk 1.4 that changes the behavior to accept the incoming INVITE with either audio and T38, or only T38 (if we only got

Re: [asterisk-users] 1.4.23 + Realtime Queues/Agents NOT via SIP

2009-03-10 Thread Shawn Brewer
Softphones out of the question? -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Peter Beckman Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 10:24 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] 1.4.23 +

Re: [asterisk-users] Sending faxes with T.38 problem. Asterisk - 1.6.0.6

2009-03-10 Thread Joshua Colp
- Benny Amorsen benny+use...@amorsen.dk wrote: Joshua Colp jc...@digium.com writes: This was filed as an issue and is being tracked at http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12437. Thus far I have created a branch for Asterisk 1.4 that changes the behavior to accept the incoming INVITE

Re: [asterisk-users] work around the 64 pickupgroups limit

2009-03-10 Thread Benny Amorsen
Klaus Darilion klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at writes: Maybe we should change the groups from a bitmask to an AST_LIST That would be a serious pessimization, but I guess it would work if every phone is in just a few groups. The optimal implementation would probably be a bit vector. /Benny

Re: [asterisk-users] 1.4.23 + Realtime Queues/Agents NOT via SIP

2009-03-10 Thread Sebastian
IAX2 also support InUse, is a good choice for Agents at home because IAX is nat friendly :) -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Peter Beckman Sent: martes, 10 de marzo de 2009 12:24 p.m. To:

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk/Skype update

2009-03-10 Thread Casey Boone
Enjoyed the podcast :) Does anyone have any idea what the pricing structure will be for this? are we talking $10/channel? $100/channel? Does this log into the Skype network as multiple users? One global user for the business as a whole? Do I have to have 1 user login per inbound channel?

Re: [asterisk-users] Sending faxes with T.38 problem. Asterisk - 1.6.0.6

2009-03-10 Thread Santiago Gimeno
Hello, Thanks everybody for the answers. Could be. Would you post the Cisco config relevant to this? dial-peer voice 5 voip description ** ** preference 1 destination-pattern 1… voice-class codec 1 session protocol sipv2 session target ipv4:1.1.1.1 session transport udp dtmf-relay rtp-nte

Re: [asterisk-users] configuring channels for dahdi

2009-03-10 Thread Aqua Man
[channels] usecallerid=yes callerid=asreceived cidsignalling=bell hidecallerid=no callwaiting=yes musiconhold=default usecallingpres=yes callwaitingcallerid=yes threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes canpark=yes cancallforward=yes callreturn=yes echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=no echotraining=400

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk/Skype update

2009-03-10 Thread Casey Boone
Enjoyed the podcast :) Does anyone have any idea what the pricing structure will be for this? are we talking $10/channel? $100/channel? Does this log into the Skype network as multiple users? One global user for the business as a whole? Do I have to have 1 user login per inbound channel?

Re: [asterisk-users] Cdr problem

2009-03-10 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Tuesday 10 March 2009 05:31:38 Hooman Peiro wrote: thanks for your responses, I checked again and I found that I asked a wrong question! I was supposed to ask about answer time. The answer time is not getting save in the database. Answer time = calldate + duration - billsecs -- Tilghman

Re: [asterisk-users] Cdr problem

2009-03-10 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Tuesday 10 March 2009 03:11:57 Anthony Francis wrote: Tilghman Lesher wrote: On Monday 09 March 2009 01:28:49 pm Anthony Francis wrote: Tilghman Lesher wrote: On Friday 06 March 2009 11:24:46 pm Hooman Peiro wrote: hi, I'm working with asterisk on a project and I found a problem with

Re: [asterisk-users] configuring channels for dahdi

2009-03-10 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 04:20:47AM -1000, Aqua Man wrote: after installing asterisk 1.4.23.1 and dahdi-linux-2.1.0.4 and at CLI module load chan_dahdi.so receive the following: signalling must be specified before any channels are. CLI Warning [4663]: chan_dahdi.c:11627

Re: [asterisk-users] in which asterisk version is zaptel removed?

2009-03-10 Thread Vieri
--- On Tue, 3/10/09, Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com wrote: But it will still be able to build vs. zaptel, and read configuration from zapata.conf . See http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4/Zaptel-to-DAHDI.txt Sorry to get back on this silly compilation issue. Also,

Re: [asterisk-users] work around the 64 pickupgroups limit

2009-03-10 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 05:00:38PM +0100, Benny Amorsen wrote: Klaus Darilion klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at writes: Maybe we should change the groups from a bitmask to an AST_LIST That would be a serious pessimization, Also space-wise but I guess it would work if every phone is in just

Re: [asterisk-users] Sending faxes with T.38 problem. Asterisk - 1.6.0.6

2009-03-10 Thread David Backeberg
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Santiago Gimeno santiago.gim...@gmail.com wrote: dial-peer voice 5 voip description ** ** preference 1 destination-pattern 1… voice-class codec 1 session protocol sipv2 session target ipv4:1.1.1.1 session transport udp dtmf-relay rtp-nte fax-relay ecm

Re: [asterisk-users] configuring channels for dahdi

2009-03-10 Thread Aqua Man
That appeared to work and the dahdi.conf I sent already to userslist. new error message is :unable to create channel of type Zap' (cause 0 - Unknown) Thanks Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:37:35 +0200 From: tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re:

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6, B410P and TE/PtmP mode. Could you get it running ?

2009-03-10 Thread Matthew Fredrickson
Olivier wrote: Hi, My setup is: IPPhone1 --- Asterisk1 with B410P Patton 4638 --- Asterisk2 --- IPPhone2 I want to evaluate Asterisk1 in TE/PtmP mode. So, Patton box is configured in NT/PtmP (with 3 BRI links between both systems). Anyway, asterisk -rx pri show spans keeps

Re: [asterisk-users] dahdi wcb4xxp and fax

2009-03-10 Thread Matthew Fredrickson
Olivier wrote: 2009/2/27 Matthew Fredrickson cres...@digium.com mailto:cres...@digium.com I have a couple of suggestions: Make sure that your timing configuration is correct in /etc/dahdi/system.conf (that it has a valid timing source). Also, you probably will

Re: [asterisk-users] in which asterisk version is zaptel removed?

2009-03-10 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 09:38:34AM -0700, Vieri wrote: --- On Tue, 3/10/09, Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com wrote: But it will still be able to build vs. zaptel, and read configuration from zapata.conf . See

[asterisk-users] AST-2009-002: Remote Crash Vulnerability in SIP channel driver

2009-03-10 Thread Asterisk Security Team
Asterisk Project Security Advisory - AST-2009-002 ++ | Product | Asterisk |

Re: [asterisk-users] Sending faxes with T.38 problem. Asterisk - 1.6.0.6

2009-03-10 Thread Matthew Fredrickson
Santiago Gimeno wrote: Hello, Thanks everybody for the answers. Could be. Would you post the Cisco config relevant to this? dial-peer voice 5 voip description ** ** preference 1 destination-pattern 1… voice-class codec 1 session protocol sipv2 session target ipv4:1.1.1.1 session

[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4.24-rc1 Now Available

2009-03-10 Thread Asterisk Development Team
The Asterisk Development Team is pleased to announce the first release candidate of Asterisk 1.4.24, tagged as version 1.4.24-rc1. Release candidate 1.4.24-rc1 is available for immediate download at http://downloads.digium.com/ In addition to other bug fixes, this release candidate fixes several

[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6.0.7-rc1 Now Available

2009-03-10 Thread Asterisk Development Team
The Asterisk Development Team is pleased to announce the first release candidate of Asterisk 1.6.0.7, tagged as version 1.6.0.7-rc1. Release candidate 1.6.0.7-rc1 is available for immediate download at http://downloads.digium.com/ In addition to other bug fixes, this release candidate resolves an

[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6.1.0-rc2 Now Available

2009-03-10 Thread Asterisk Development Team
The Asterisk Development Team is pleased to announce the second release candidate of Asterisk 1.6.1, tagged as version 1.6.1.0-rc2. Release candidate 1.6.1.0-rc2 is available for immediate download at http://downloads.digium.com/ In addition to other bug fixes, this release candidate adds

Re: [asterisk-users] Sending faxes with T.38 problem. Asterisk - 1.6.0.6

2009-03-10 Thread Santiago Gimeno
Thanks for the tip. Sadly, it didn't work. I keep getting the same error: [Mar 10 18:49:48] WARNING[18855]: app_fax.c:176 phase_e_handler: Error transmitting fax. result=11: Far end cannot receive at the resolution of the image. regards, Santi On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Matthew

[asterisk-users] Odd occurrence

2009-03-10 Thread Danny Nicholas
Greetings listers, I am running Asterisk 1.4.21.2 on Suse 11.0 on a Dual Processor Dell Poweredge 1650. I recently attempted to update the BIOS and now have this happen: When the machine starts up, Asterisk runs fine. When I do a large wget or scp, the local SIP to

[asterisk-users] 1.6.x differences

2009-03-10 Thread Joseph L. Casale
What are the differences, or where do i find docs on the difference between the 1.6.0.x and 1.6.1.x release? Thanks! jlc ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update

Re: [asterisk-users] 1.6.x differences

2009-03-10 Thread Leif Madsen
Joseph L. Casale wrote: What are the differences, or where do i find docs on the difference between the 1.6.0.x and 1.6.1.x release? Check the CHANGES file in the Asterisk source directory. Leif Madsen. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by

[asterisk-users] Phone Directories/Asterisk/SIP/directory.html

2009-03-10 Thread Elizabeth Steinke
Greetings! We are using cisco 7940 phone with SIP and asterisk. We would like to be able to have phone directories available on the phones that are sourced from active directory. Are their any scripts that can connect to the AD server via LDAP and then create the directory.html file for the

Re: [asterisk-users] 1.6.x differences

2009-03-10 Thread Mark Michelson
Joseph L. Casale wrote: What are the differences, or where do i find docs on the difference between the 1.6.0.x and 1.6.1.x release? Thanks! jlc A good place to find that out is to look at the CHANGES file in the Asterisk source. This file tells the of new features/behavior added since the

[asterisk-users] Does the Asterisk/Digium support REGISTER requests with Authorization header field sent by a UAC before receiving 401 Unauthorized

2009-03-10 Thread cool goose
Hi All, In RFC 2617 in Section 1.2 Access Authentication Framework states the below mentioned: A user agent that wishes to authenticate itself with an origin server--usually, but not necessarily, after receiving a 401 (Unauthorized)--MAY do so by including an Authorization header

Re: [asterisk-users] Odd occurrence

2009-03-10 Thread Brent Davidson
Danny Nicholas wrote: Greetings listers, I am running Asterisk 1.4.21.2 on Suse 11.0 on a Dual Processor Dell Poweredge 1650. I recently attempted to update the BIOS and now have this happen: When the machine starts up, Asterisk runs fine. When I do a large

Re: [asterisk-users] Phone Directories/Asterisk/SIP/directory.html

2009-03-10 Thread Anthony Messina
On Tuesday 10 March 2009 13:32:37 Elizabeth Steinke wrote: Greetings! We are using cisco 7940 phone with SIP and asterisk. We would like to be able to have phone directories available on the phones that are sourced from active directory. Are their any scripts that can connect to the AD

Re: [asterisk-users] Odd occurrence

2009-03-10 Thread Danny Nicholas
_ From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Brent Davidson Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 2:52 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Odd occurrence Danny

Re: [asterisk-users] configuring channels for dahdi

2009-03-10 Thread Aqua Man
Typed the dahdi restart command and the output is listed in the email as per your request. #[0;37;40m*CLI da##[K##[Kstop now#[7Gclear#[K#[7Gdahdi restart #[0;37;40mDestroying channels and reloading DAHDI configuration. Initial softhangup of all DAHDI

[asterisk-users] chan_zap.so missing

2009-03-10 Thread markus
Hello everyone! I installed Asterisk following the instructions of the book Asterisk: The Future of Telephony. (very nice book) However, I failed. I installed zaptel, libpri and asterisk (in this order). The Installation of Zaptel is successful and my TDM400P is correctly detected: # zttool

Re: [asterisk-users] chan_zap.so missing

2009-03-10 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
markus wrote: I installed Asterisk following the instructions of the book Asterisk: The Future of Telephony. (very nice book) However, I failed. You 'failed' because you installed Asterisk 1.6.0.6, which contains a very large number of changes compared to Asterisk 1.4, which is what the

Re: [asterisk-users] how to write svn for dahdi-linux and dahdi-tools when using svn 1.4

2009-03-10 Thread Sean Bright
Zen Kato wrote: When we use svn branches-1.4 such as: # svn checkout http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4 asterisk-1.4 # svn checkout http://svn.digium.com/svn/libpri/branches/1.4 libpri-1.4 There aren't currently any branches for DAHDI, so you can either grab trunk (the latest

Re: [asterisk-users] chan_zap.so missing

2009-03-10 Thread Barry L. Kline
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 markus wrote: Hello everyone! I installed Asterisk following the instructions of the book Asterisk: The Future of Telephony. (very nice book) However, I failed. I installed zaptel, libpri and asterisk (in this order). If you are using

Re: [asterisk-users] work around the 64 pickupgroups limit

2009-03-10 Thread Matt Riddell
On 7/03/2009 4:58 a.m., Klaus Darilion wrote: Hi! What are the typical ways to work around the 64 groups limit? What we actually do is store a pickup group with a caller id. So the AsteriskDB has ${DB/pickup/${CALLERID(num)}} and we set pickupmark to the same. That way when someone dials 29

Re: [asterisk-users] configuring channels for dahdi

2009-03-10 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
Useful VIM command: :%s/#\[.;3.;40m//g On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:03:03AM -1000, Aqua Man wrote: Typed the dahdi restart command and the output is listed in the email as per your request. *CLI dahdi restart Destroying channels and reloading DAHDI configuration. Initial softhangup of

Re: [asterisk-users] Faxing success rate on PRI

2009-03-10 Thread Marco Signorini
Thank you, Doug, for precious information. Best regards, Marco Signorini. === INGEGNI Tech S.r.l. http://www.ingegnitech.com Doug Lytle wrote: Main fax server: Mandriva 2008.1 Kernel 2.6.24.5 (Compiled for source) (1) Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz Digium TE110P (23

Re: [asterisk-users] chan_zap.so missing

2009-03-10 Thread Vieri
--- On Tue, 3/10/09, markus antro...@googlemail.com wrote: Now I am missing /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/chan_zap.so. I searched through the mailing list and forums. They say, that chan_zap.so is build in channels/ in my working directory. But it's not too strange, that chan_zap.so was not

Re: [asterisk-users] chan_zap.so missing

2009-03-10 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Vieri wrote: Sorry to barge in like this but I would like to know if chan_zap.c is supposed to be present in 1.4.23.1. As documented in the CHANGES file that comes with 1.4.23, the answer is no. chan_zap.c was renamed to chan_dahdi.c, but still supports Zaptel. Please read the

Re: [asterisk-users] chan_zap.so missing

2009-03-10 Thread Mark Michelson
Vieri wrote: --- On Tue, 3/10/09, markus antro...@googlemail.com wrote: Now I am missing /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/chan_zap.so. I searched through the mailing list and forums. They say, that chan_zap.so is build in channels/ in my working directory. But it's not too strange, that

Re: [asterisk-users] chan_zap.so missing

2009-03-10 Thread Vieri
--- On Tue, 3/10/09, Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.com wrote: Sorry to barge in like this but I would like to know if chan_zap.c is supposed to be present in 1.4.23.1. As documented in the CHANGES file that comes with 1.4.23, the answer is no. chan_zap.c was renamed to chan_dahdi.c,

Re: [asterisk-users] chan_zap.so missing

2009-03-10 Thread markus
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 15:44 -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: markus wrote: I installed Asterisk following the instructions of the book Asterisk: The Future of Telephony. (very nice book) However, I failed. You 'failed' because you installed Asterisk 1.6.0.6, which contains a very large

Re: [asterisk-users] chan_zap.so missing

2009-03-10 Thread Miguel Molina
Vieri escribió: --- On Tue, 3/10/09, Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.com wrote: Sorry to barge in like this but I would like to know if chan_zap.c is supposed to be present in 1.4.23.1. As documented in the CHANGES file that comes with 1.4.23, the answer is no. chan_zap.c was

[asterisk-users] MacroExclusive crashed asterisk

2009-03-10 Thread Rizwan Hisham
Hi all, I think running the macroexclusive application if it is run after hangup (on h extension) crashes asterisk. This has happened a lot of times since i started using the macro exclusive application. There is a situation in my dialplan when after the user hangsup the call, i execute the macro

Re: [asterisk-users] DAHDI and B410P (BRI)

2009-03-10 Thread Paul Hales
I wish it was available too - I have just had to back dahdi out of a system and revert to misdn after a whole day of testing. PaulH Andrew Thomas wrote: I have LibPri installed and working (.../wPRI). So, if I understand Tzafrir correctly - DAHDI support for the B410P isn't available in