Claudio [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Claudio wrote on Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 06:04:14PM +0200 :
quota DOES NOT work on ext3 filesystem at the moment. I reported this
problem since 9.0 beta 1...
If you want to use quote, you MUST use XFS!
That is incorrect. It does work on ext3 and has worked
So sprach David Walluck am 2002-10-13 um 14:22:06 -0400 :
Beware of using XFS on your root partition. I have done this, and
Mandrake tools do not properly load the XFS module so that you can
access your root partition if you build your own kernel.
Is it really a problem of using XFS for /?
Alexander Skwar wrote:
So sprach David Walluck am 2002-10-13 um 14:22:06 -0400 :
Beware of using XFS on your root partition. I have done this, and
Mandrake tools do not properly load the XFS module so that you can
access your root partition if you build your own kernel.
Is it really a
On Tuesday 15 October 2002 23:01, Todd Lyons wrote:
Claudio wrote on Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 06:04:14PM +0200 :
quota DOES NOT work on ext3 filesystem at the moment. I reported this
problem since 9.0 beta 1...
If you want to use quote, you MUST use XFS!
That is incorrect. It does work on
Claudio wrote on Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 06:04:14PM +0200 :
quota DOES NOT work on ext3 filesystem at the moment. I reported this
problem since 9.0 beta 1...
If you want to use quote, you MUST use XFS!
That is incorrect. It does work on ext3 and has worked since beta 1.
The problem is that
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Claudio wrote:
To be exact, even root cannot see the right quota for a user on ext3
filesystem. The files aquota.* are never up-to-date if root does not run
quotacheck. The only thing that really suggest you are out of quota is the
message disk quota exceeded while
Jose Antonio Becerra Permuy wrote on Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 09:00:19PM +0200 :
El Dom 13 Oct 2002 20:22, David Walluck escribi?:
Beware of using XFS on your root partition. I have done this, and
Mandrake tools do not properly load the XFS module so that you can
access your root partition if
Claudio wrote on Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 06:04:14PM +0200 :
quota DOES NOT work on ext3 filesystem at the moment. I reported this
problem since 9.0 beta 1...
If you want to use quote, you MUST use XFS!
That is incorrect. It does work on ext3 and has worked since beta 1.
The problem is that it
Todd Lyons wrote:
Jose Antonio Becerra Permuy wrote on Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 09:00:19PM +0200 :
El Dom 13 Oct 2002 20:22, David Walluck escribi?:
Beware of using XFS on your root partition. I have done this, and
Mandrake tools do not properly load the XFS module so that you can
access your
On 13 Oct 2002, Bjarne Thomsen wrote:
Big? 800kb in compressed form.
For a patch, that looks horribly big to me. And look at the code,
it is not simply an addon module. It puts all sorts of things in the kernel.
Unstable?? Look here:
Well, I had some fs corruption with XFS when pluggin the
Big? 800kb in compressed form.
Unstable?? Look here:
At the D0 experiment at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory we
have a ~150 node cluster of desktop machines all using the SGI-patched
kernel. Every large disk (40Gb) or disk array in the cluster uses XFS
including 4x640Gb disk servers
Bjarne Thomsen wrote:
Big? 800kb in compressed form.
Unstable?? Look here:
At the D0 experiment at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory we
have a ~150 node cluster of desktop machines all using the SGI-patched
kernel. Every large disk (40Gb) or disk array in the cluster uses XFS
El Dom 13 Oct 2002 20:22, David Walluck escribió:
Beware of using XFS on your root partition. I have done this, and
Mandrake tools do not properly load the XFS module so that you can
access your root partition if you build your own kernel.
I have been using XFS in the root partition
Why is XFS the only journaling FS that is not
included in the main 2.4 tree, considering
that Mandrake, SuSE, Gentoo, Slackware, and
JB Linux all have support for XFS?
-- Bjarne
On Sat, 2002-10-12 at 19:52, Wes Kurdziolek wrote:
XFS will most likely not be integrated into the 2.4 tree.
On
For one, the XFS patches are rather non-invasive. Folks have argued on
lkml for a long time that Linus doesn't integrate patches that are too
invasive when quite the opposite is true -- he'd rather integrate
invasive stuff to make patching the kernel up w/ less-invasive patches
less difficult.
On Sat, 12 Oct 2002, Claudio wrote:
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Brent Hasty wrote:
3)Quotas might work better in XFS, but I haven't tested that enough ...
(ie from a windows box via samba).
quota DOES NOT work on ext3 filesystem at the moment. I reported this
problem since 9.0 beta 1...
On Sunday 13 October 2002 10:16, Bjarne Thomsen wrote:
Why is XFS the only journaling FS that is not
included in the main 2.4 tree, considering
that Mandrake, SuSE, Gentoo, Slackware, and
JB Linux all have support for XFS?
Because, simply, XFS is a horrible big complex patch that possibly
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Danny Tholen wrote:
On Sunday 13 October 2002 10:16, Bjarne Thomsen wrote:
Why is XFS the only journaling FS that is not
included in the main 2.4 tree, considering
that Mandrake, SuSE, Gentoo, Slackware, and
JB Linux all have support for XFS?
Because, simply, XFS is
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Brent Hasty wrote:
so how about ext3 vs XFS wich would you prefer?
and why?
The advantages vs. disadvantages?
That's something I would also want to hear opinions on ...
Since we got ACL support for ext3, they are mostly similar in features,
except:
1)Intermezzo doens't
On Saturday 12 October 2002 07:44, Brent Hasty wrote:
so how about ext3 vs XFS wich would you prefer?
and why?
I prefer ext3 because current XFS doesn't like preemptive kernel (available on
mdk club now). Perhaps XFS from cvs is better.
Danny
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Brent Hasty wrote:
3)Quotas might work better in XFS, but I haven't tested that enough ...
(ie from a windows box via samba).
quota DOES NOT work on ext3 filesystem at the moment. I reported this
problem since 9.0 beta 1...
If you want to use quote, you MUST use XFS!
Does anybody know if XFS has been included
in 2.4.20-pre or 2.4.20-pre-ac ?
Bjarne
On Sat, 2002-10-12 at 18:04, Claudio wrote:
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Brent Hasty wrote:
3)Quotas might work better in XFS, but I haven't tested that enough ...
(ie from a windows box via samba).
quota
XFS will most likely not be integrated into the 2.4 tree.
On Sat, 2002-10-12 at 12:35, Bjarne Thomsen wrote:
Does anybody know if XFS has been included
in 2.4.20-pre or 2.4.20-pre-ac ?
Bjarne
On Sat, 2002-10-12 at 18:04, Claudio wrote:
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Brent Hasty wrote:
I thought quotas *did* work, but users couldn't get quota reports, only
root.
On Sat, 2002-10-12 at 12:04, Claudio wrote:
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Brent Hasty wrote:
3)Quotas might work better in XFS, but I haven't tested that enough ...
(ie from a windows box via samba).
quota DOES NOT
On Sat, 12 Oct 2002, Buchan Milne uttered these words of wisdom:
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Brent Hasty wrote:
so how about ext3 vs XFS wich would you prefer?
and why?
The advantages vs. disadvantages?
That's something I would also want to hear opinions on ...
Since we got ACL support for ext3,
so how about ext3 vs XFS wich would you prefer?
and why?
The advantages vs. disadvantages?
26 matches
Mail list logo
