Bug#946044: marked as done (dolphin/kio: notification of file copy/move operations still depends on old kde4 packages)

Your message dated Thu, 24 Dec 2020 19:49:59 +0100 with message-id <3718929.yKVeVyVuyW@thyrus> and subject line Re: Bug#946044: dolphin/kio: notification of file copy/move operations still depends on old kde4 packages has caused the Debian Bug report #946044, regarding dolphin/kio: notifi

Bug#946044: dolphin/kio: notification of file copy/move operations still depends on old kde4 packages

Package: kio Version: 5.62.1-2 Severity: normal Dear maintainer, why do the notification operations related to copying / moving a file depend on old packages of kde 4:14? If I remove these packages (previous release 4:4.14.38): "kate-data katepart kdelibs-bin kdelibs5-data kdelibs5-plugins

Bug#779276: marked as done (kdelibs5-plugins: a reference to hebrew hspell dictionary is hardcoded in /usr/lib/kde4/kspell_hspell.so)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Aug 2019 15:34:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935666: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #779276, regarding kdelibs5-plugins: a reference to hebrew hspell dictionary is hardcoded in /usr/lib/kde4/kspell_hspell.so

Bug#648238: marked as done (libakonadi-kde4: akonadi imap resource segfaults)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Aug 2019 15:30:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935663: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #648238, regarding libakonadi-kde4: akonadi imap resource segfaults to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#533831: marked as done (/usr/bin/kde4: NumLock led behaves inversely if num lock is turned on kde4 startup)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Aug 2019 15:29:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#935664: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #533831, regarding /usr/bin/kde4: NumLock led behaves inversely if num lock is turned on kde4 startup to be marked as done

Bug#388341: marked as done (Drop pmount recommends for KDE4)

Your message dated Fri, 21 Dec 2018 15:45:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#917017: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #388341, regarding Drop pmount recommends for KDE4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#875015: marked as done ([libkdegames-kde4] Future Qt4 removal from Buster)

Your message dated Fri, 21 Dec 2018 15:40:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#917012: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #875015, regarding [libkdegames-kde4] Future Qt4 removal from Buster to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#879393: marked as done (Updating the libkdegames-kde4 Uploaders list)

Your message dated Fri, 21 Dec 2018 15:40:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#917012: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #879393, regarding Updating the libkdegames-kde4 Uploaders list to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

libkdegames-kde4 is marked for autoremoval from testing

libkdegames-kde4 4:14.12.3-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2018-03-18 It is affected by these RC bugs: 875015: libkdegames-kde4: [libkdegames-kde4] Future Qt4 removal from Buster

Bug#875015: Last buster libkdegames-kde4 reverse dependencies gone

Control: severity -1 serious When the latest kolf and ksirk uploads migrate to testing there will be no users of libkdegames-kde4 left in buster. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for

Processed: Last buster libkdegames-kde4 reverse dependencies gone

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #875015 [src:libkdegames-kde4] [libkdegames-kde4] Future Qt4 removal from Buster Severity set to 'serious' from 'wishlist' -- 875015: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=875015 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#749032: marked as done (python-kde4: crash in apport-kde)

Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2018 13:18:39 + with message-id <e1edfwb-000h58...@fasolo.debian.org> and subject line Bug#887377: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #749032, regarding python-kde4: crash in apport-kde to be marked as done. This means th

Bug#858489: marked as done (python-kde4-dev: broken symlink: /usr/bin/pykdeuic4 -> ../share/pyshared/PyQt4/uic/pykdeuic4.py)

Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2018 13:18:39 + with message-id <e1edfwb-000h58...@fasolo.debian.org> and subject line Bug#887377: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #858489, regarding python-kde4-dev: broken symlink: /usr/bin/pykdeuic4 -> ../share/pysha

Bug#866283: marked as done (python-kde4: maintainer script(s) not using strict mode)

Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2018 13:18:39 + with message-id <e1edfwb-000h58...@fasolo.debian.org> and subject line Bug#887377: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #866283, regarding python-kde4: maintainer script(s) not using strict mode to be marked a

Bug#649936: marked as done (python-kde4: Python modules linked with libpython)

Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2018 13:18:39 + with message-id <e1edfwb-000h58...@fasolo.debian.org> and subject line Bug#887377: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #649936, regarding python-kde4: Python modules linked with libpython to be marked a

Bug#715443: marked as done (python-kde4-dev: broken symlinks /usr/bin/pykdeuic4-3.[23] - missing python3-pykde4 dependency?)

Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2018 13:18:39 + with message-id <e1edfwb-000h58...@fasolo.debian.org> and subject line Bug#887377: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #715443, regarding python-kde4-dev: broken symlinks /usr/bin/pykdeuic4-3.[23] - missing p

Bug#567657: marked as done (python-kde4: Error in pykde_kde_sip_flags parameter)

Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2018 13:18:39 + with message-id <e1edfwb-000h58...@fasolo.debian.org> and subject line Bug#887377: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #567657, regarding python-kde4: Error in pykde_kde_sip_flags parameter to be marked a

Bug#864965: marked as done (kajongg: Depends on python-kde4 which is to be removed for Buster)

Your message dated Sat, 09 Dec 2017 12:09:58 + with message-id <e1endx8-00060h...@fasolo.debian.org> and subject line Bug#864965: fixed in kajongg 4:17.08.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #864965, regarding kajongg: Depends on python-kde4 which is to be removed for Buster to be

Bug#864965: current version does not need python-kde4

Buster is on kajongg 16.08, tomorrow KDE 17.12 will be tagged. Please consider updating. The depencendy of python-kde4 has gone. 17.12 is ported to python3, python2 is not supported anymore. 17.12 is ported to qt5, qt4 is not supported anymore. New dependency is twisted 16.6.0 but Buster

Bug#864967: marked as done (parley: Recommends python-kde4 which is to be removed for Buster)

Your message dated Sat, 02 Dec 2017 19:42:53 +0100 with message-id <19412697.nL1mK75mOu@pendragon> and subject line Fixed in experimental already has caused the Debian Bug report #864967, regarding parley: Recommends python-kde4 which is to be removed for Buster to be marked as done. This

Bug#879393: Updating the libkdegames-kde4 Uploaders list

Source: libkdegames-kde4 Version: 4:14.12.3-2 Severity: minor User: m...@qa.debian.org Usertags: mia-teammaint Fathi Boudra <f...@debian.org> has retired, so can't work on the libkdegames-kde4 package anymore (at least with this address). We are tracking their status in the MIA team and

Bug#864967: parley: Recommends python-kde4 which is to be removed for Buster

PyKDE4 will be removed as well. This package > recommends python-kde4. If you want it to be part of the Buster release, > it will have to be ported to Qt5 (Kf5 Python bindings are not available > yet, but they are expected to be packaged early in the Buster > development cycle). The cur

Bug#875015: [libkdegames-kde4] Future Qt4 removal from Buster

Source: libkdegames-kde4 Version: 4:14.12.3-2 Severity: wishlist User: debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org Usertags: qt4-removal Hi! As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4 as [announced] in: [announced] <https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2017/08/msg6.h

Bug#865861: marked as done (python-kde4: Qtwebkit not available breaks importing plasma module)

Your message dated Sat, 15 Jul 2017 22:17:20 + with message-id <e1dwvni-000fof...@fasolo.debian.org> and subject line Bug#865861: fixed in pykde4 4:4.14.3-2+deb9u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #865861, regarding python-kde4: Qtwebkit not available breaks importing plasma

Bug#866283: python-kde4: maintainer script(s) not using strict mode

Package: python-kde4 Version: 4:4.14.3-2 Severity: normal User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: colis-shparser Dear maintainer, at least one of the maintainer scripts (preinst, postinst, prerm, postrm) of the package python-kde4 does not use strict mode. Policy section 10.4 says: "Shell sc

Bug#865861: marked as done (python-kde4: Qtwebkit not available breaks importing plasma module)

Your message dated Mon, 26 Jun 2017 20:58:19 + with message-id <e1dpb5p-0009tt...@fasolo.debian.org> and subject line Bug#865861: fixed in pykde4 4:4.14.3-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #865861, regarding python-kde4: Qtwebkit not available breaks importing plasma module to be

Bug#865861: python-kde4: Qtwebkit not available breaks importing plasma module

:38:09 schrieben Sie: > On Monday, June 26, 2017 05:21:00 PM you wrote: > > Am 25.06.2017 um 21:41 schrieb Scott Kitterman: > > > On June 25, 2017 7:24:58 AM EDT, ZevenOS <les...@zevenos.com> wrote: > > >> Package: python-kde4 > > >> Version: 4:4.14

Bug#865861: python-kde4: Qtwebkit not available breaks importing plasma module

On June 25, 2017 7:24:58 AM EDT, ZevenOS <les...@zevenos.com> wrote: > >Package: python-kde4 >Version: 4:4.14.3-2 >Severity: grave >Justification: renders package unusable > >Dear Maintainer, > > * What led up to the situation? >Importing Plasma in python

Bug#865861: python-kde4: Qtwebkit not available breaks importing plasma module

Package: python-kde4 Version: 4:4.14.3-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? Importing Plasma in python scripts throws an error * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? from PyKDE4

Bug#864967: parley: Recommends python-kde4 which is to be removed for Buster

Package: parley Version: 4:16.08.3-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, During the Buster development cycle Qt4 is going to be removed. As a result, PyQt4 and PyKDE4 will be removed as well. This package recommends python-kde4. If you want it to be part of the Buster release, it will have

Bug#864965: kajongg: Depends on python-kde4 which is to be removed for Buster

Package: kajongg Version: 4:16.08.3-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, During the Buster development cycle Qt4 is going to be removed. As a result, PyQt4 and PyKDE4 will be removed as well. This package depends on python-kde4. If you want it to be part of the Buster release, it will have

Bug#858489: python-kde4-dev: broken symlink: /usr/bin/pykdeuic4 -> ../share/pyshared/PyQt4/uic/pykdeuic4.py

Package: python-kde4-dev Version: 4:4.14.3-2 Severity: normal User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates) a broken symlink. >From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): 3m46.5s ERROR: FAIL: Broken symli

Re: [stretch] kdialog and okular still based on kde4

lications, at least at the moment, do not follow the font-hinting settings, while KDE4-based programs do. MfG bmg -- „Des is völlig wurscht, was heut beschlos- | M G Berberich sen wird: I bin sowieso dagegn!“ | m...@m-berberich.de (SPD-Stadtrat Kurt Schindler; Regensburg) |

Re: [stretch] kdialog and okular still based on kde4

On Monday, 20 March 2017 17:01:24 CET solitone wrote: > On Monday, 20 March 2017 16:42:21 CET Luigi Toscano wrote: > > On Monday, 20 March 2017 16:36:11 CET solitone wrote: > > > > As well as okular, kde-baseapps-bin (providing kdialog) would need an > > > upgrade to 16.12 to take advantage of

Re: [stretch] kdialog and okular still based on kde4

On Monday, 20 March 2017 16:42:21 CET Luigi Toscano wrote: > On Monday, 20 March 2017 16:36:11 CET solitone wrote: > > I fear that too. It would be nice thought that it'd be at least included > > in sid, so that we could backport it to stretch. > > I guess you mean experimental. That will happen

Re: [stretch] kdialog and okular still based on kde4

on gentoo: > $equery list -op okular > * Searching for okular ... > [-P-] [ ] kde-apps/okular-16.08.3:4/16.08 > [-P-] [ ] kde-apps/okular-16.12.3:5 > [I-O] [ ] kde-apps/okular-:5 He tells me that: okular-16.08.3:4 means that release 16.08 is in slot 4, so kde4. okular-16

Re: [stretch] kdialog and okular still based on kde4

On Monday, 20 March 2017 16:36:11 CET solitone wrote: > On Monday, 20 March 2017 16:23:06 CET Luigi Toscano wrote: > > > Anyway, for the reason you gave, I think it would be a good thing if > > > that > > > was included in stretch. It might give a better user experience. > > > > I think it's a

Re: [stretch] kdialog and okular still based on kde4

On Monday, 20 March 2017 16:32:06 CET solitone wrote: > On Monday, 20 March 2017 16:15:43 CET inkbottle wrote: > > what made you find out that the 16.12 version was kf5 based? > > I can see it there: > > > version=16.12.0#okular> > >

Re: [stretch] kdialog and okular still based on kde4

On Monday, 20 March 2017 16:23:06 CET Luigi Toscano wrote: > > Anyway, for the reason you gave, I think it would be a good thing if that > > was included in stretch. It might give a better user experience. > > I think it's a bit too late given the release cycle, but I'm not a packager > for those

Re: [stretch] kdialog and okular still based on kde4

On Monday, 20 March 2017 16:15:43 CET inkbottle wrote: > what made you find out that the 16.12 version was kf5 based? > I can see it there: > version=16.12.0#okular> > But I have to read hard. Hi, we had a discussion on the kde

Re: [stretch] kdialog and okular still based on kde4

On Monday, 20 March 2017 16:15:43 CET inkbottle wrote: > On Monday, March 20, 2017 2:56:03 PM CET solitone wrote: > > So my question is: is there any chance that relase 16.12 of okular and > > kdialog (based on kde-frameworks5) are included in stretch? Currently > > we've

Re: [stretch] kdialog and okular still based on kde4

On Monday, March 20, 2017 2:56:03 PM CET solitone wrote: > So my question is: is there any chance that relase 16.12 of okular and > kdialog (based on kde-frameworks5) are included in stretch? Currently > we've got 16.08 (kde4 based), both in stretch an in sid. That is interesting,

[stretch] kdialog and okular still based on kde4

.x, so this explains the issue in kdialog and okular. So my question is: is there any chance that relase 16.12 of okular and kdialog (based on kde-frameworks5) are included in stretch? Currently we've got 16.08 (kde4 based), both in stretch an in sid. Cheers, Davide - [1] https

Bug#796183: marked as done (Add Recommends: python-kde4 (for /usr/share/kde4/apps/kstars/scripts/supernova_updates_parser.py))

Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2017 17:37:25 +0100 with message-id <20170210163725.rhbw33u3vem5x...@gnuservers.com.ar> and subject line Re: Bug#796183: Add Recommends: python-kde4 (for /usr/share/kde4/apps/kstars/scripts/supernova_updates_parser.py) has caused the Debian Bug report #

Is there a bug which tracks kde4 obsolence ?

Hi all, Is there a way to track kde4 and related libraries removal from the archive, as now kde5 is pretty good. https://www.kde.org/announcements/plasma-5.8.0.php Look forward to know. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC

Re: KDE4 in Stretch?

On Wednesday 01 June 2016 21:13:04 Andrej Kacian wrote: > On Wed, 01 Jun 2016 20:39:23 +0200 > > Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > I hope that Qt 5.6.1 also will fix more things than it breaks. Then maybe > > one of the last things I am quite annoyed with, that is multiscreen >

multiscreen handling in Plasma (was: Re: KDE4 in Stretch?)

On Mittwoch, 1. Juni 2016 21:13:04 CEST Andrej Kacian wrote: > On Wed, 01 Jun 2016 20:39:23 +0200 > > Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > I hope that Qt 5.6.1 also will fix more things than it breaks. Then maybe > > one of the last things I am quite annoyed with, that is

Re: KDE4 in Stretch?

On Wed, 01 Jun 2016 20:39:23 +0200 Martin Steigerwald wrote: > I hope that Qt 5.6.1 also will fix more things than it breaks. Then maybe one > of the last things I am quite annoyed with, that is multiscreen handling will > work robustly, but I think it already got better

multiscreen handling in Plasma (was: Re: KDE4 in Stretch?)

On Mittwoch, 1. Juni 2016 20:57:40 CEST Diederik de Haas wrote: > On Wednesday 01 June 2016 20:39:23 Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > I hope that ... multiscreen handling will work robustly > > http://vizzzion.org/blog/2016/05/multiscreen-in-plasma-5-7-and-beyond/ may > be of interest to you then I

Re: KDE4 in Stretch?

On Wednesday 01 June 2016 20:39:23 Martin Steigerwald wrote: > I hope that ... multiscreen handling will work robustly http://vizzzion.org/blog/2016/05/multiscreen-in-plasma-5-7-and-beyond/ may be of interest to you then signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: KDE4 in Stretch?

r > each big 5.x upgrade. Every new major release brings in new bugs, new > instabilities, new crashes, and doesn't seem to fix almost any of the > previous ones. It is also slower than KDE4 was, even with significantly > beefier hardware. > > Now, I do not have time to

KDE4 in Stretch?

crashes, and doesn't seem to fix almost any of the previous ones. It is also slower than KDE4 was, even with significantly beefier hardware. Now, I do not have time to report all these bugs and work with the developers to fix them, even though that would be the correct thing to do. Therefore I'd like

Processed (with 1 error): Re: notes-mobile: fails to upgrade from 'jessie' - trying to overwrite /usr/share/kde4/apps/notes-mobile/notes.qml

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:kdepim 4:4.14.10-2 Bug #799625 [notes-mobile] notes-mobile: fails to upgrade from 'jessie' - trying to overwrite /usr/share/kde4/apps/notes-mobile/notes.qml Bug reassigned from package 'notes-mobile' to 'src:kdepim'. No longer marked as fo

Bug#799625: notes-mobile: fails to upgrade from 'jessie' - trying to overwrite /usr/share/kde4/apps/notes-mobile/notes.qml

Control: reassign -1 src:kdepim 4:4.14.10-2 Control: affects -1 + notes-mobile Control: done -1 4:15.08.3-1 Hi, The newer versions of kdepim dropped the extra "-mobile" applications thus I'm closing this bug for the kf5 versions of kdepim. Happy hacking, -- "It's a well-known fact that

Bug#822439: marked as done (lokalize: please remove kdesdk-strigi-plugins and python-kde4 from dependencies)

Your message dated Tue, 10 May 2016 16:39:26 + with message-id <e1b0agw-00054j...@franck.debian.org> and subject line Bug#822439: fixed in lokalize 4:16.04.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #822439, regarding lokalize: please remove kdesdk-strigi-plugins and python-kde4 from depend

Bug#822439: lokalize: please remove kdesdk-strigi-plugins and python-kde4 from dependencies

Package: lokalize Version: 4:15.12.1-1 Severity: normal those are leftovers from kde4 times -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.5.0-pf1netbook (SMP w/2 CPU cores

Re: Manage kde4 kwallet from plasma desktop

D > > repositories. I have done the migration from kwalletd4 to kwalletd5 during > > the transition to plasma. As i always use the kde4 kwallet instance for > > kde-pim (4:4.14.10-2) i would like to manage some aspects of the legacy > > kde4 kwallet (master password, clos

Re: Manage kde4 kwallet from plasma desktop

On Freitag, 26. Februar 2016 15:07:18 CET Gael wrote: > Hello Martin, > > Thanks for the advices ! > > I think that i will give a try to kdepim and akonadi 15.12. You are not the > first one to tell me that it was stable enough and that performance was > greatly improved. I would like to go with

Re: Manage kde4 kwallet from plasma desktop

templateparser5 > libkf5tnef5 Suggested packages: > jovie clamav procmail spamassassin | bogofilter | spambayes | bsfilter | > crm114 gnokii akonadi-server Recommended packages: > kdepim-themeditors ktnef > The following packages will be REMOVED: > akonadi-kde-resource-googledata

Re: Manage kde4 kwallet from plasma desktop

On Friday 26 February 2016 15:07:18 Gael wrote: > I would like to go with debian experimental packages (does someone is > running it already and confirm me that it's working well ?) I have upgraded various/lots of packages to the experimental versions yesterday, but NOT kdepim. While it is

Re: Manage kde4 kwallet from plasma desktop

kde-full kde-standard kdenetwork kdepim-kresources kdeutils kgpg kjots knode kopete libakonadi-calendar4 libakonadi-contact4 libakonadi-kcal4 libakonadi-kde4 libakonadi-kmime4 libcalendarsupport4 libeventviews4 libincidenceeditorsng4 libkabc4 libkalarmcal2 libkblog4 libkcal4 libkdepim4

Re: Manage kde4 kwallet from plasma desktop

On Freitag, 26. Februar 2016 09:34:22 CET Gael wrote: > Hello, > > I'm actually an happy user of KDE on a Debian fully upgraded against SID > repositories. I have done the migration from kwalletd4 to kwalletd5 during > the transition to plasma. As i always use the kde4 kwallet ins

Manage kde4 kwallet from plasma desktop

Hello, I'm actually an happy user of KDE on a Debian fully upgraded against SID repositories. I have done the migration from kwalletd4 to kwalletd5 during the transition to plasma. As i always use the kde4 kwallet instance for kde-pim (4:4.14.10-2) i would like to manage some aspects

Re: Change old kde4 font scaling/sizes after upgrade?

rfect, but I can live with it :) > > > > Right now I'm having a few HiDPI related issues now that X and KDE seem to > > support it much better now. Kmail as a kde4 app has massive fonts even in > > the ui, probably due to reading in my old dpi and font sizes from the old > > kde install.

Re: Change old kde4 font scaling/sizes after upgrade?

at X and KDE seem to > support it much better now. Kmail as a kde4 app has massive fonts even in > the ui, probably due to reading in my old dpi and font sizes from the old > kde install. > > Where do I find the right place to change those settings? I've searched > around in my .k

Re: Change old kde4 font scaling/sizes after upgrade?

w kde packages in debian, and > > > things > > > are working pretty decently. Not perfect, but I can live with it :) > > > > > > Right now I'm having a few HiDPI related issues now that X and KDE seem > > > to > > > support it much better now.

Re: Change old kde4 font scaling/sizes after upgrade?

and KDE seem to > support it much better now. Kmail as a kde4 app has massive fonts even in > the ui, probably due to reading in my old dpi and font sizes from the old > kde install. > > Where do I find the right place to change those settings? I've searched > around in my .kde dir a b

Re: Change old kde4 font scaling/sizes after upgrade?

rfect, but I can live with it :) > > > > Right now I'm having a few HiDPI related issues now that X and KDE seem to > > support it much better now. Kmail as a kde4 app has massive fonts even in > > the ui, probably due to reading in my old dpi and font sizes from the old > &

Bug#810515: libkface-data: fails to upgrade from 'sid' - trying to overwrite /usr/share/kde4/apps/libkface/database/dbconfig.xml

ing to unpack .../libkface-data_4%3a15.04.0-1_all.deb ... Unpacking libkface-data (4:15.04.0-1) ... dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/libkface-data_4%3a15.04.0-1_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/kde4/apps/libkface/database/dbconfig.xml', which is a

Change old kde4 font scaling/sizes after upgrade?

I finally was able to upgrade to the new kde packages in debian, and things are working pretty decently. Not perfect, but I can live with it :) Right now I'm having a few HiDPI related issues now that X and KDE seem to support it much better now. Kmail as a kde4 app has massive fonts even

Bug#802461: marked as done (dolphin4: fails to upgrade from 'jessie' - trying to overwrite /usr/lib/kde4/dolphinpart.so)

Your message dated Sat, 05 Dec 2015 11:22:03 + with message-id <e1a5auh-0004ys...@franck.debian.org> and subject line Bug#802461: fixed in kde-baseapps 4:15.08.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #802461, regarding dolphin4: fails to upgrade from 'jessie' - trying to overwrite /usr/li

Bug#802461: dolphin4: fails to upgrade from 'jessie' - trying to overwrite /usr/lib/kde4/dolphinpart.so

4_4%3a15.08.2-1_amd64.deb ... Unpacking dolphin4 (4:15.08.2-1) ... dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/dolphin4_4%3a15.08.2-1_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/kde4/dolphinpart.so', which is also in package dolphin 4:4.14.2-1 dpkg-deb: error: subproc

Processed: notes-mobile: fails to upgrade from 'jessie' - trying to overwrite /usr/share/kde4/apps/notes-mobile/notes.qml

Processing control commands: > affects -1 + kdepim-mobile Bug #799625 [notes-mobile] notes-mobile: fails to upgrade from 'jessie' - trying to overwrite /usr/share/kde4/apps/notes-mobile/notes.qml Added indication that 799625 affects kdepim-mobile -- 799625: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-

Bug#799625: notes-mobile: fails to upgrade from 'jessie' - trying to overwrite /usr/share/kde4/apps/notes-mobile/notes.qml

1-1) ... dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/notes-mobile_4%3a4.14.10-2_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/kde4/apps/notes-mobile/notes.qml', which is also in package tasks-mobile 4:4.14.1-1 cheers, Andreas kdepim-mobile_4:4.14.10-2.log.gz Descript

Bug#799294: marked as done (kate (kf5 version) depends on kde4 package katepart)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Sep 2015 01:19:39 + with message-id <e1zd6ov-0003ra...@franck.debian.org> and subject line Bug#799294: fixed in kate 4:15.08.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #799294, regarding kate (kf5 version) depends on kde4 package katepart to be marked as done. This

Bug#799294: kate (kf5 version) depends on kde4 package katepart

Package: kate Version: 4:15.08.0-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, The current kate package contains a KF5 version of kate, but still depends on the package katepart, which is from kde4. That can't be right, can it? (In particular, as a consequence, kate pulls in libkdecore5, the KDE4 kdelibs

Bug#799294: kate (kf5 version) depends on kde4 package katepart

On 17/09/15 17:27, Ralf Jung wrote: > Package: kate > Version: 4:15.08.0-1 > Severity: normal > The current kate package contains a KF5 version of kate, but still depends on > the package katepart, > which is from kde4. That can't be right, can it? > (In particular, as a co

Bug#796183: Add Recommends: python-kde4 (for /usr/share/kde4/apps/kstars/scripts/supernova_updates_parser.py)

, KStars works as normal. Using strace I determined this is due to: root@het:~# python /usr/share/kde4/apps/kstars/scripts/supernova_updates_parser.py Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/share/kde4/apps/kstars/scripts/supernova_updates_parser.py, line 26, in module from

Bug#792119: marked as done (kde-style-breeze-qt4: Breeze style works with KDE4 apps but it doesn't with Qt4 ones)

Your message dated Wed, 29 Jul 2015 21:36:10 + with message-id e1zkz1g-0008n2...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#792119: fixed in breeze 4:5.3.2-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #792119, regarding kde-style-breeze-qt4: Breeze style works with KDE4 apps but it doesn't with Qt4 ones

Bug#792318: marked as done ([kde-plasma-desktop] Depends on not-installable KDE4 kde-workspace)

Your message dated Sat, 18 Jul 2015 18:50:01 + with message-id e1zgxbr-0003bn...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#792318: fixed in meta-kde 5:86 has caused the Debian Bug report #792318, regarding [kde-plasma-desktop] Depends on not-installable KDE4 kde-workspace to be marked as done

Bug#792318: [kde-plasma-desktop] Depends on not-installable KDE4 kde-workspace

Package: kde-plasma-desktop Severity: normal Version: 5:85 kde-plasma-desktop should depend on plasma-desktop and not kde-workspace. The latter one is for KDE4 and cannot be installed anymore --- System information. --- Architecture: amd64 Kernel: Linux 4.0.0-2-amd64 Debian Release

Bug#792318: [kde-plasma-desktop] Depends on not-installable KDE4 kde-workspace

Hi Franz, Am Montag, 13. Juli 2015, 21:32:25 schrieb Franz Schrober: Package: kde-plasma-desktop Severity: normal Version: 5:85 kde-plasma-desktop should depend on plasma-desktop and not kde-workspace. The latter one is for KDE4 and cannot be installed anymore I thought kde-plasma-desktop

Bug#792119: Plugin is installed to kde4 path

El Diumenge, 12 de juliol de 2015, a les 11:56:22, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer va escriure: I have just found out that running qtconfig-qt4 and selecting Desktop theme, saving and restarting it will make it use Breeze theme on Plasma 5. If the kde4 plugin gets in QT_PLUGIN_PATH

Bug#792119: Plugin is installed to kde4 path

On Saturday 11 July 2015 15:39:07 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: Hi! The plugin seems to be installed in a kde4 path, so there is no way for it to be used by pure-qt apps. Maybe something is missing or maybe the plugin is just for KDE4 apps. I correct myself. Doing

Bug#792119: Plugin is installed to kde4 path

After installing the breeze-kde4 package on Archlinux, I got the breeze theme both for KDE and Qt4-only apps. Indeed, your workaround looks similar to what the Archlinux guys are doing. See the bottom of this PKGBUILD: https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h

Bug#792119: Plugin is installed to kde4 path

tag 792119 moreinfo thanks On Sunday 12 July 2015 11:43:20 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: On Saturday 11 July 2015 15:39:07 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: Hi! The plugin seems to be installed in a kde4 path, so there is no way for it to be used by pure-qt apps

Processed: Re: Bug#792119: Plugin is installed to kde4 path

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 792119 moreinfo Bug #792119 [kde-style-breeze-qt4] kde-style-breeze-qt4: Breeze style works with KDE4 apps but it doesn't with Qt4 ones Added tag(s) moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance

Bug#792119: kde-style-breeze-qt4: Breeze style works with KDE4 apps but it doesn't with Qt4 ones

Package: kde-style-breeze-qt4 Version: 4:5.3.2-2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, After upgrading to Plasma 5 in Sid, the Qt4-only apps look really ugly, while KDE4 (and even GTK!) ones looks fine. If I run qtconfig-qt4, the Breeze style is not available in the 'GUI Style' combobox, while

Bug#792119: Plugin is installed to kde4 path

Hi! The plugin seems to be installed in a kde4 path, so there is no way for it to be used by pure-qt apps. Maybe something is missing or maybe the plugin is just for KDE4 apps. -- lo cual parece incompatible. lógica, esa tendrá particiones dentro, si se transforma la extendida a tiene

Bug#788465: kdepim-mobileui-data: fails to upgrade from 'sid' - trying to overwrite /usr/share/kde4/apps/libmessageviewer/pics/mobile_bg.png

. Preparing to unpack .../kdepim-mobileui-data_4%3a4.14.5-1_all.deb ... Unpacking kdepim-mobileui-data (4:4.14.5-1) ... dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/kdepim-mobileui-data_4%3a4.14.5-1_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/kde4/apps/libmessageviewer

Bug#784154: marked as done (plasma-nm: new KDE4 upstream version 0.9.3.6)

Your message dated Mon, 18 May 2015 18:31:27 + with message-id e1yupp1-0006kz...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#784154: fixed in plasma-nm 0.9.3.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #784154, regarding plasma-nm: new KDE4 upstream version 0.9.3.6 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#784154: plasma-nm: new KDE4 upstream version 0.9.3.6

Package: plasma-nm Version: 0.9.3.4-2 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, Several new maintenance releases of plasma-nm for KDE 4 have been released, we're now up to 0.9.3.6 while 0.9.3.4 is in sid. I've rated this as important since 0.9.3.5 includes a bugfix for a segfault in

Bug#779276: kdelibs5-plugins: a reference to hebrew hspell dictionary is hardcoded in /usr/lib/kde4/kspell_hspell.so

Package: kdelibs5-plugins Version: 4:4.14.2-5 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, Akonadi is allways reporting the following error message: Hspell: can't open /usr/share/hspell/hebrew.wgz.sizes Actually, this file path is hardcoded in the binary /usr/lib/kde4/kspell_hspell.so I've made some

Bug#766667: ruby-kde4: korundum4.so depends on libruby.so.1.9 which does not exist anymore

Package: ruby-kde4 Version: 4:4.14.2-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I tried to run some ruby plasma applets (with plasmoidviewer) and got some errors. Afer some reserch i found that korundum4.so depends on libruby.so.1.9. But libruby.so.1.9 is no longer available on Debian/unstable. $ ldd

Bug#766667: marked as done (ruby-kde4: korundum4.so depends on libruby.so.1.9 which does not exist anymore)

Your message dated Fri, 24 Oct 2014 22:55:42 +0200 with message-id 0b07d7222443a155f300f4a4176c4...@pino.toscano.name and subject line Re: Bug#77: ruby-kde4: korundum4.so depends on libruby.so.1.9 which does not exist anymore has caused the Debian Bug report #77, regarding ruby-kde4

Bug#766143: kate: tries to overwrite '/u/s/kde4/[...]/kateproject.example' also in package kate-data 4:4.14.2-1

/var/cache/apt/archives/kate_4%3a4.14.2-1_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/kde4/apps/kate/plugins/project/kateproject.example', which is also in package kate-data 4:4.14.2-1 dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) Errors were encountered while

Bug#766143: marked as done (kate: tries to overwrite '/u/s/kde4/[...]/kateproject.example' also in package kate-data 4:4.14.2-1)

Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 13:18:53 + with message-id e1xgzkv-0002pm...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#766143: fixed in kate 4:4.14.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #766143, regarding kate: tries to overwrite '/u/s/kde4/[...]/kateproject.example' also in package kate-data

Bug#759961: marked as done (calligra: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat 'debian/tmp/usr/lib/kde4/wpgimport.so': No such file or directory)

Your message dated Fri, 12 Sep 2014 07:00:27 + with message-id e1xskqj-000257...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#754568: fixed in calligra 1:2.8.5+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #754568, regarding calligra: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat 'debian/tmp/usr/lib/kde4/wpgimport.so

Bug#759814: /usr/lib/kde4/kcm_kmail.so does not offer a KDE 4 compatible factory.

kmail2(7187)/kdecore (KLibrary) kde4Factory: The library /usr/lib/kde4/kcm_kmail.so does not offer a KDE 4 compatible factory

Bug#759961: calligra: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat 'debian/tmp/usr/lib/kde4/wpgimport.so': No such file or directory

]: Entering directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»' dh_install --list-missing cp: cannot stat 'debian/tmp/usr/lib/kde4/wpgimport.so': No such file or directory dh_install: cp -a debian/tmp/usr/lib/kde4/wpgimport.so debian/karbon//usr/lib/kde4/ returned exit code 1 debian/rules:33: recipe for target

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >