The only problem I am having is creating individual cfg files that they can
create for their own blacklists or filters. The Global cfg file defines the
test however I can't see how I can personalize the filters.
Right now, there aren't any per-user/per-domain blacklists. The only way
to do that
Just starting to setup SPAMDOMAINS ... is the following setup correct?
IN config put:
spamdomains c:\imail\declude\sd.txt
In sd.txt
sprintpcs.com .sprintip.net
The received line looks like this:
Received: from dedicated60-bos.wh.sprintip.net [63.167.114.16]
Thanks for the corrections.
Please do not move this group to Yahoo! Groups.
- Original Message -
From: Rifat Levis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 8:17 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Yahoo Groups.
Hi ,
I dont know if anyone else has made a suggestion like this.
Do you
Just starting to setup SPAMDOMAINS ... is the following setup correct?
IN config put:
spamdomains c:\imail\declude\sd.txt
Close. In the global.cfg file you should have a line:
SPAMDOMAINS spamdomainsc:\imail\declude\sd.txt x
10 0
That defines the test
Hello,
I can't find the message where John Tolmachoff had responded to this thread
but he mentioned he had a system in place that could support this.
-
John,
Is your system WIKI-like at all? Meaning many people could help contribute
directly to the Knowledge Base. Or would all updates have to
At this time, all updates would be routed through one person to update
manually.
If there is a better way...
BTW, if someone has a better way and wants to maintain it, but has no server
available, it can be done on mine.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
No thanks. This is less than ideal, but I like Yahoo Groups even less. I
am also not in favour of a Wiki board, because I mistrust the nature of it,
that is, the ability for anyone to modify any post. Declude JunkMail is a
small fish in a big ocean, but remember that the spammers won't like us.
We have just released Declude JunkMail v1.75 (release version). See
http://www.declude.com/junkmail/manual.htm . Notable changes since the
last beta include:
o A number of minor fixes
Other additions and fixes can be found in the release notes, at
http://www.declude.com/relnotes.htm .
A Wiki would be perfect for this. I would run one, but my only spare box has
no hard drives in it. :(
-josh
From: John Tolmachoff \(Lists\) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: eServices For You
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 10:14:56 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Hi,
I'm running WebBoard.
Advantage:
You can 'subscribe' to the list and read/reply as before.
You can open the board using NNTP newsreaders (e.g., Outlook Express)
You can read/reply/post/search on the web - and have attachments.
It's a threaded board - no need to quote entire messages just
I'm getting complaints about bounce messages from spammers that are using
internal emails as the FROM person. The bounce messages go back to the
original recipient who never sent the email in the first place.
Is this a valid command at the top of the bounce message that declude would
send out if
Ah shucks, I was looking forward to the new spam test that you had been
evaluating that would add a header to messages like the following:
X-Spam-Prob: 0.29
Has that test been abandoned?
Bill
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm getting complaints about bounce messages from spammers that are using
internal emails as the FROM person. The bounce messages go back to the
original recipient who never sent the email in the first place.
This is very common -- and why we recommend not whitelisting E-mail from
your own
We have the pro version of Junkmail and have been using word filters under
the assumption that they filter based on phrases. Some recent mail was
filtered and the line indicated in the log file was a phrase, not a word,
which wasn't in the outgoing mail. Does Declude filter on entire phrases or
Great! Question though regarding previous beta tests, will they be
added to the manual or are they abandonded?
Thanks
-Nick Hayer
Date sent: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:46:54 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We have the pro version of Junkmail and have been using word filters under
the assumption that they filter based on phrases.
They do. :)
Some recent mail was
filtered and the line indicated in the log file was a phrase, not a word,
which wasn't in the outgoing mail. Does Declude filter on
Ah shucks, I was looking forward to the new spam test that you had been
evaluating that would add a header to messages like the following:
X-Spam-Prob: 0.29
Has that test been abandoned?
It hasn't been abandoned, but should appear in the next beta.
07/22/2003 15:01:57 Q8a220d1a00b4cc34 Msg failed WEIGHT150 (Weight of 169
reaches or exceeds the limit of 150.). Action=IGNORE.
WEIGHT 150 ACTION SHOULD BOUNCE...WHY DID IT IGNORE?
TWO SECONDS LATER:
07/22/2003 15:01:59 Q8a2314af00a2d099 Msg failed WEIGHT150 (Weight of 193
reaches or exceeds
07/22/2003 15:01:57 Q8a220d1a00b4cc34 Msg failed WEIGHT150 (Weight of 169
reaches or exceeds the limit of 150.). Action=IGNORE.
WEIGHT 150 ACTION SHOULD BOUNCE...WHY DID IT IGNORE?
TWO SECONDS LATER:
07/22/2003 15:01:59 Q8a2314af00a2d099 Msg failed WEIGHT150 (Weight of 193
reaches or exceeds
Return Receipt
Your Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.75 (release
document version) released
:
Anyone have one handy that might assist me? Hahaha
Thanks.. Jeff
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe
That's because Declude JunkMail is very flexible, and has per-user,
per-domain, incoming, outgoing, and now even sender actions. So a single
test may have many different actions.
In this case, you have a configuration file with WEIGHT150 BOUNCE, and
another that either has WEIGHT150 IGNORE or no
Title: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] A good SD.TXT File?
amazon.com
aol.com netscape.net
att.net
attbi.com
bellatlantic.net verizon.net
bellsouth.net bellsouth.com
charter.net
china.com
comcast.net
compuserve.com aol.com
cs.com aol.com
concentric. .cnchost.com
cox.net
earthlink.
email.it
That's because Declude JunkMail is very flexible, and has per-user,
per-domain, incoming, outgoing, and now even sender actions. So a single
test may have many different actions.
In this case, you have a configuration file with WEIGHT150 BOUNCE, and
another that either has WEIGHT150 IGNORE or
I would recommend using LOGLEVEL HIGH in the \IMail\Declude\global.cfg
file. When doing so, Declude JunkMail will record in the log file which
configuration file it is using. That will make it easier to see which
config file has WEIGHT150 IGNORE (or no action listed for
WEIGHT150). My
Title: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] A good SD.TXT File?
The
SPAMDOMAINS with an sd.txt file sounds interesting? Is this working well
for you? What weight are you giving it?
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Mark
GordonSent: Tuesday,
Although that is possible, it is also (MORE) likely he has someone in the
recipient list whitelisted (like postmaster@) (or the email is from a
whitelisted sender, but no as likely as the recipient).
Karen
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry
Why two different action results?
I have an interesting problem.
One of my clients does have a T-1 with
ATT.
When they send emails with no attachments it works
fine, no problem at all but when they attach an a file and it does not have to
be more than a few K's they get a timeout when sending emails.
If they send from any
So, your internal users are sending out spam with a score of over 150?
-Original Message-
From: Robert Forsyth
guess would be that this is for outgoing E-mail, in the
\IMail\Declude\global.cfg file.
Found it...forgot to check the Outbound rules in the GLOBAL.
sorry for
We use
ATT and the only problem I have had like this is with network latency. Do a
tracert to where the mail is being delivered to and see how long it take to make
each hop. The problem may not be with ATT but somewhere along the path to
the remote server the mail is being delivered to.
A
What is the usage for the BCC test? I don't remember seeing it mentioned
before (and it is not in the manual that I can find).
You just need to define the test in the \IMail\Declude\global.cfg file,
such as:
BCC bcc 5 x 3 0
This would assign a weight of 3 to any E-mail that had
What do the log files say? Do they indicate a connection?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of i360
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:59 PM
To: [EMAIL
Title: Message
I would look for
the easy stuff first. This sounds exactly like the speed and duplex
setting are mismatched somewhere between the mail server and the inside of the
ATT hardware.
Andrew.
-Original Message-From: i360
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday,
I give it a much lower rate because it will fail legitimate forwarded
email. This is the only issue I have discovered -
-Nick Hayer
Giving it a weight of 20 but be careful that this is not the only test
it will fail as it can be dangerous to block from the large domains.
Return Receipt
Your RE: [Declude.JunkMail] A good SD.TXT File?
document
:
Hello, All,
I don't know if this would require a separate test or of there is some way
you can twist SPAMDOMAINS to have the desired result...
But as SPAMDOMAINS can be configured to add points on to the weight of a
message if the message fails the test I would also like to be able to have a
test
Scott, does this mean that this test will not work for gateway messages
(relayed, non-local e-mails)?
Bill
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] bcc?
What is the usage for
http://www.globalremoval.com/
No comment .
Rifat Levis
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe
Right now, there aren't any per-user/per-domain blacklists. The only way
to do that right now would be to add a new blacklist for each
user/domain. If that was done for hundreds/thousands of users, it could
use up a lot of resources.
I appreciate the overload however how do you create the
Scott, does this mean that this test will not work for gateway messages
(relayed, non-local e-mails)?
It will still work with E-mail addressed to gateway domains (where IMail
forwards the E-mail to another server).
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail:
40 matches
Mail list logo
