A recap:
5 people including me have reported having this problem in the last week or
so.
One of those does not use AVG.
Alex has reported to me that since disabling AVG he has not seen the problem
reoccur in 1 1/2 days.
I have not disabled AVG as I do not think it is the culprit. My server has
A few questions to the customers having this issue.
What version of Windows are you using?
What SP's are installed?
What version of Declude are you using?
What version of IMail are you using?
What hot fixes have you applied to IMail?
How long before you see this resource problem?
Does your
What version of Windows are you using?
Win 2K Advanced Server
What SP's are installed?
SP2
What version of Declude are you using?
declude 1.77131
What version of IMail are you using?
IMail 7.15
What hot fixes have you applied to IMail?
everything up to 7.15
How long before you see this
Here's a frustrating issue...
I have two WEIGHT10 tests, one to move the mail message to the user's spambox
(WEIGHT10) and another to modify the subject (WEIGHT10SUB). Both work most of
the time, but I have users complaining about occasionally getting filtered spam
in their INBOX instead of
On the ones that get through are you able to check the logs to see if the
mailbox move is actually being triggered? I am curious to see the log
entries for the one that does what it is suppose to do versus the one that
does not.
In regards to adding the header - since you only want the
http://www.betanews.com/article/FTC_Begins_Operation_Spam_Zombies/1117033441
The interesting part I find is this -
Operation Spam Zombies, will begin by sending letters to over 3,000 ISPs
worldwide, instructing them on how to prevent customers' computers from
being compromised by spammers.
Right idea Ralph. We need to all work together to find this, as it happened
again this morning.
What version of Windows are you using?
Windows 2000 server standard
What SP's are installed?
SP4
What version of Declude are you using?
2.0.6 NOTE: I also tried 2.0.6.14 and it occurred as well.
Responses to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s
questions.
What version of Windows are you using?
Win 2K Server
What SP's are installed?
SP4
What version of Declude are you using?
C:\IMaildeclude -diagDeclude 1.81 (C) Copyright 2000-2004
Computerized Horizons.
What version of IMail are you using?
Imail 8.2
This is the type of inconsistent behavior that I recall others
commenting about when they mix IMail's anti-spam or rules with Declude.
You should check your logs for these messages and verify if they were
processed with Declude or not.
One other caveat would be restarting the Queue Manager
Incremental Release
A new incremental release (2.0.6.16) is now available for customers with a
current service agreement. This release includes:
. Virus scanner rules change option (EXITSCANONVIRUS)
. Bitmasked External Test Results - JunkMail enhancement
. Remove Process
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Barry -
A new incremental release (2.0.6.16) is now available for customers with a
current service agreement. This release includes:
. Virus scanner rules change option (EXITSCANONVIRUS)
Excellent! Scott will be mad! He liked all those scanners running for
Yes - kudos to CpHz for what they added and for the manner it which it is
being made available!
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of NIck Hayer
Sent:
Exitscanonvirus: excellent enhancement.
I've cursed the Process Counter popup after every server restart.
Curious on the reasoning behind the bitmasking external test results. I
haven't run across an external program that uses it. Looking up 'bitmask'
and 'external' in the archive, provided
Oh, the bitmask test has a good application.
I'll have to see whether I can make it work with invURIBL. But, invURIBL
tests a number of competing aspects of a message that overlap with a
number of DIFFERENT test. If I can figure out which class or classes of
tests invURIBL fails, then that allows
Scott,
This was the result of a need that I expressed to them. You of course
need both Declude and the external test to support bitmasking before it
can be used, and not just one or the other.
This essentially allows us to construct a single executable that can
test for different items and
15 matches
Mail list logo
