I'm looking for an app that will test the latency/queue speed of email from
the Internet through our organization.
We have 4 IMAIL/Declude filter/gateway servers in front of our Exchange
system.
From there we have 3 Front End Exchange servers behind a Foundry load
balancer.
There are 5 back-end
---Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for
utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail Queue Monitoring, Declude
Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log
Parsers.
- Original Message -
From:
Mark
E. Smith
To: Declude.JunkMail
Looks like www.surbl.org has
about10 round-robin DNS mirror sites.
Onlyhalf actually contains the RBL file used to create the
body filter surbl.txt
Anyone know anything about
this?
To test:
ipconfig -flushdns
Bring this up in
IE.
http://www.surbl.org/sc.surbl.org.rbldnsd
Repeat
4-5
Does anyone know why occasionally the SMTP
header of Declude will show up in the message body?Here's an
example:-0-From: Rachel
Horton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent:
Mon 8/1/2005 11:04 AMSubject:To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: This
week's casesDate: Mon, 01
Title: Message
It's being viewed in Outlook 2003 through Exchange. It's
not a header setting.
We just us Declude/Imail as a Gateway for
Exchange.
Very odd.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck
SchickSent: Monday, August 01, 2005 2:30 PMTo:
Ok so once the initial load is complete, will this bog down Imail (having
20,000 aliases in the registry)?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Sanford Whiteman
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 5:07 PM
To: Mark E. Smith
Subject: Re
We have 3 declude gateway servers that sit in front of our Exchange system.
We want to move the three round-robin DNS servers to a VIP on our Foundry
Load Balancers.
The load balancers can be setup in a source NAT configuration (which is
easier) or DSR (Direct Server Return).
In source NAT the
] Question about load balancers
and source IP
Use SKIPIP
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark E. Smith
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 3:02 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
I have never used a Foundry Load Balancer so my response may
be way off. I am assuming it is not functioning as a MTA, but
is simply rewriting the source IP portion of packets.
Correct but it only does this at the IP level, not at the SMTP protocol
level.
In other words, Windows IP gets the
Before we moved to HP Openview (very pricy) we used a combination of Big
Brother and IpSwitch What's Up Gold with the Exchange add-in.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Buenz
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 4:57 PM
To:
I *THINK* that the LDAP queries are case sensitive.
Try that -- I know that the OU works
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fosseen
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 5:03 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re:
We have a 5mb attachment limit on our Exchange servers and
we use Imail/declude as a gateway.
We have the need to allow 10mb attachments to "pass" but
only for some people.
So, I was thinking that I could create a series of
tests:
Created a test called "SIZE10MB" for 10mb attachments (with
We can't use Sandy's Exchange2Aliases because (at last
check) it doesn't pull mail-enabled public folders from AD.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
Tolmachoff (Lists)Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2004 2:59
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
so we need to do
it in declude with the SIZE external tests.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Sanford Whiteman
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2004 5:28 PM
To: Mark E. Smith
Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Gateway servers
Having said that could it be one of
the external tests that Declude is calling?
In other words, it would appear that the problem is with
Declude.exe but it's really with a shelled process that
declude is calling? That shouldn't cause this -- Declude will
timeout the external process
We're pushing about 150,000 messages per day through this
server.
Dual processor 2Ghz, 2GB RAM, RAID 5.
This server ONLY runs Imail/Declude as a
gateway.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus
GuflerSent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 8:08 AMTo:
I've been able to narrow down the locked file problem to
Scott Fisher's external tests.
I re-enabled SpamCHK - no problems.
If I enable any of the following:
size.exe
obfsubj.exeHEADER2.exe
dispfrom.exe
I start seeing random locked files in the \spool
directory.
Scott, Any thoughts on
choked on. Updating to 8.05
HF3 fixed it for us, and we haven't seen it since.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Frolick" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Mark E. Smith" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail/Declu
How does Imail know if Declude has run on these files?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.
Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 2:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail/Declude queues backing
- Spool directory - an explanation of
files
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-19981110-DD08.htm
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Mark E.
Smith
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 7:38 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail/Declude queues
Well, of course I knew Ipswitch would say this but I'll post it anyway. :)
Ipswitch says that the problem is that declude is locking the file but not
unlocking it when it's done.
Having said that could it be one of the external tests that Declude is
calling?
In other words, it would appear that
haven't seen it since.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Charles Frolick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mark E. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail/Declude queues backing up
Hello Mark,
Monday, December 13, 2004, 10:04
I know
this has been asked before but which processes first Junkmail or
Virus?
If
Virus is first, is there a way to change this?
Considering we delete about 50% of inbound messages as spam that would
take the load off of the virus scanner.
I've got a whitelist filter file where I use the action STOPALLTESTS:
MAILFROMSTOPALLTESTSCONTAINS@netrends.com
This rule is defined as the first rule in my global.cfg (above all of the
IP4r, Catchall, externals, etc.)
If it trips the WHITELIST filter, why do the other tests
Ok so this is really working how I'd like it to
The rule is defined with a global.cfg weight of -1000
If the domain is whitelisted then the -1000 is applied to any non-filter
type tests and NO other filters are run.
In essence the domain is whitelisted because all of the other non-filter
I have 3 inbound relayers running declude and I want to consolidate the log
files to a single system.
I'm planning on using Microsoft's robocopy utility to copy the log files.
I'm not sure if robocopy locks the source file during the copy or not so
here's my question..
IF the log file is locked
I have a filter that I've built for one of my customers that allows them to
whitelist items JUST for their domain.
The way that I do this is to add the following lines to their whitelist
filter:
ALLRECIPSEND NOTCONTAINS@domain1.
ALLRECIPSEND NOTCONTAINS@domain2.
Example, you may have a mail enabled folder, but only
one group is allowed to send to it. Why would you want the
script to create that?
Because we have many public folders that are emailed from the outside.
For example [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] are public folders for
us.
Trial reveals spammer techniques
Convicted junk e-mailer sent 10 million messages a day
LEESBURG, Virginia (AP) -- As one of the world's most prolific spammers,
Jeremy Jaynes pumped out at least 10 million e-mails a day with the help of
16 high-speed lines, the kind of Internet capacity a
One other thing that I noticed (and reported to Sandy) was that in an
Exchange environment:
1. All SMTP addresses for a given user don't have aliases created. For
example, I use mark_smith, mesmith, and msmith. Only my primary SMTP address
was output.
2. Distribution Lists aren't exported
3. Mail
We only use Imail as a Gateway.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of sbsi lists
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 5:01 PM
To: Markus Gufler
Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Question on Dell Poweredge 1750
Hi Markus,
Interested in
Most spiders actually visit the page anyway so this doesn't help.
The Javascript method usually works best.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Davidson
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 11:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
1.) Anyone has had the known Imail-NIC problems with this
Ethernet ports?
We have 4 1750's using adapter teaming without any problem.
Although I've never heard of an application level issue with a NIC (in
WinNT+)
2.) The system is preconfigured with Win2003 Server on 2 x 80
GB RAID 1 SCSI
I've been trapping them with the various suntrust strings in the subject
line.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 3:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] anyone know how to
Interesting maps by Postini that illuminate the geographical origins of
spam, viruses and directory harvest attacks.
Map shortcuts:
Spam
http://postini.com/stats/world-spam-2048.jpg
Viruses
http://postini.com/stats/world-virus-2048.jpg
Directory harvest attacks
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mark E. Smith
Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2004 9:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Maps of Spam, Viruses, and
Dictionary
harvest attacks.
Interesting maps by Postini that illuminate
Will having a mis-matched round-robin MX record vs. HELO on the SMTP server
cause any issues with Spam filters?
IOW, Let's say I setup 1 MX entry:
MX - MX.domain.com (Pref 10)
Then Round robin:
A - MX.domain.com - 192.168.100.1
A - MX.domain.com - 192.168.100.2
A -
What are we all going to do when there are no more spammers? :)
Sorta' like living in a town that's driven by tourism and saying I hate the
tourists. :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004
I've always used LOGLEVEL HIGH on my systems but I'm reconsidering that
these days since our logs are running 250mb - 350mb.
I use a number of log reports (DLAnalyizer, etc)
If I switch to LOGLEVEL MID will I lose anything in my log reporting utils?
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by
Declude logs at HIGH range between 1.2 and 1.6 GIGABYTES.
The log for
11/3 is 1,701,795 KB.
- Original Message -
From: Mark E. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 9:03 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] LOG Levels
I've always used LOGLEVEL
Andrew,
We have 3 equal MX records and 3 A records for load balancing and
redundancy.
We also have a 4th MX which is physically off-site that's a lower preference
level.
I put load-balancing in quotes because we still see our number 1 server take
the brunt of the load.
Mark
-Original
as the other tools are interesting, nothing beats a
database for it's in depth ability to look at different data elements.
-- Original Message --
From: Mark E. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 15:55:35 -0500
We
Matt,
Can you resend that filter? I checked on the archive and
the attachment isn't there.
Thanks.
Mark
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
MattSent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 12:36 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Matt,
Thanks -- didn't see that.
Can you post your (ALL) and (LAST) global configs and a
brief explanation of how you're using them?
Thanks
Mark
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
MattSent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 9:31 AMTo:
[EMAIL
In one
of my configurations, I'm running Imail/Declude in a Gateway only setup for an
Exchange system.
I was
reviewing some of my DLAnalyzer logs and notices a number of single messages
that were 51mb, 22mb, 30mb, etc.
Since
there's no way (that I've found) to prohibit the SMTP send size,
Yup. We do this but I was just trying to think of a way to
do it on the external relayers (Imail/Declude).
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
Tolmachoff (Lists)Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 6:42
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
Is there a way to have a filter run for only one domain you're hosting?
I'm running Junkmail Pro
I was thining I could put an ENDIF something in the beginning.
Here's why...
I'm hosting a gateway system for a organization that needs to filter
specific keywords so they make sure these messages
work?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Landry
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 10:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Specific filter for one domain
- Original Message -
From: Mark E. Smith [EMAIL
This is a know Outlook 2000 OWA issue. There are some counter weights that
you can put into place -- seach the mail-archive on this.
You're correct that no few legit messages should be sent this way but there
are some exceptions.
For example, Dell.com sends its quotes this way.
Why are you
Is there any way to add the tests failed and other information to the body
of the message -- maybe as a footer?
Similar to the FOOTER option in Declude Virus?
Mark
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark E. Smith
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 10:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Adding Tests failed and weight to the body
Is there any way to add the tests failed and other
information to the body of the message -- maybe as a footer
Any idea why this isn't working then?
The footer isn't in the body.
snip
10/29/2004 10:52:08 Q58eb9dc3003eff1d WHITELISTFILTER:-1100 . Total weight
= -1100.
10/29/2004 10:52:08 Q58eb9dc3003eff1d Using [incoming] CFG file
e:\IMail\Declude\netrends.com\mark_smith.junkmail.
10/29/2004 10:52:08
Looks like the footer action doesn't work with HTML email.
Is this a know issue or by design?
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL
I recently added Roger Eriksson's SURBL filter and was wondering if anyone
was using this to also pull the other SURBL lists at http://www.surbl.org/
Currently Roger's script only uses the sc.surbl.org.rbldnsd list.
http://www.botany.gu.se/download/decludescript/SURBL_filter.zip
---
[This
Does
anyone have a filter to deal with sites that purposely spoof the MAILFROM
address?
For
example, when eBay sends an email question from one user to another through its
site is puts the sender's email address.
Many
sites will allow a viewer to send an article to someone but spoof the
This is a good argument for the delayed-scan-and-deliver
feature I suggested previously. The porn guys you are
probably talking about we call the mad-lib pornsters. Every
day or so they will come out with a brand new set of domains
delivering a wide array of porn traffic.
Actually, our
All,
We're missing one huge point and that is why purchase support agreements
from Ipswitch.
Let's review.
1. To get phone support.
2. To get major software updates.
Everyone else keeps adding:
3. To get security hotfixes.
However, #3 is incorrect: From Ipswitch.com
Patches and Upgrades -
I don't think any of us would be as upset if a year ago
Ipswitch published their intentions to kill off Imail which
would have allowed everyone to come up with migration plans
or upgrade.
Exactly.
In fact, I find Ipswitch's actions to be completely deceitful.
Here is the email from the 8.12
Barry,
Thanks for the insight.
My only suggestion (and this might be the case) is to continue to upgrade
the current product and it's dependency on Imail for at least 12-24 months.
Those of us who are simply using Imail for a Gateway have no real need to
move off of it in the short term.
Thanks!
Rick,
I was looking at your filter -- great idea.
One question (which falls under the processing order)
If you have:
BODY STOPALLTESTS CONTAINS Content-Type: application/x-zip-compressed
I think Declude Virus will still grab this correct?
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
at quite a few zip viruses and didnt see any of
them using the
Content-Type: application/x-zip-compressed in the mime info
Rick Davidson
National Systems Manager
North American Title Group
-
- Original Message -
From: Mark E. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
nfo
Rick Davidson
National Systems Manager
North American Title Group
-
- Original Message -
From: "Mark E. Smith" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 1:03 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Practices for handing
legit email flagged as s
in the header.
I
don't understand your comment about Microsoft Outlook; I didn't mention it, so
it's not clear to mewhat you're clarifying.
Andrew.
-Original Message-From: Mark E. Smith
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 27,
2004 1:10 PMTo
I have an application that acts as a POP3 mail client and writes the message
body (with basic header info) to disk as a .txt file.
I drop them into a folder hierarchy based on the date, etc which Microsoft
Index server indexes (free w/ Windows).
Just look for the message via a query based web
it,
so it's not clear to mewhat you're clarifying.
Andrew.
-Original Message-From: Mark E.
Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October
27, 2004 1:10 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
Best Practices
Why not just turn the Archive feature of IMAIL SMTP on and route that way?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 5:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Determining a BCC
Sorry for the repeated posts but I think my question might have been lost in
another thread.
I'm working on a BYPASS Filter to identify ham. But I'm running into a
problem.
It seems that if STOPALLTESTS is used in place of the weight like:
BODYSTOPALLTESTSCONTAINS
What makes everyone think that Declude won't work with Ipswitch ICS?
I'll bet that the core MTA in ICS is identical to Imail -- probably 99% of
the same SMTP code.
Unless the Spool folder, file name structure and ability to call your own
SMTP32D transport is removed, I'll bet that it works.
Has
Markus,
RE:
IPSwitch's strategy urges me to completely ignore this
product. They should see, that offending customers this way
is absolutely not acceptable.
First voices on the imail list are confirming my expectation
that ICS is neither comparable with Exchange.
I agree 100% with you.
I
Re: using MS SMTP.
I believe that Scott addressed this once before but I'll take a shot at it.
If memory serves me correctly, I think the problem with MS SMTP is that
there isn't an easy way to shim declude between the SMTP listener service
and the MTA.
Remember that in Imail the SMTP service
I would recommend that all contract owners call Ipswith to voice their
concerns.
I told them that we've paid for 4 professional contracts which were supposed
to get us support, fixes, AND major upgrades.
Considering we've never called for support, and now that they've decided to
discontinue Imail,
What
SMTP field does the MAILFROM filter search look at?
I
thought it was the MAILFROMSMTP field but sometimes I think it reads the
REPLYTO SMTP Field.
Yeah and we all get $10.00 in coupons good for an Ipswitch product. :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Evans Martin
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 1:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Ipswitch/Imail...
Is there a way to check data in the REPLYTO field?
I don't see it with the MAILTO, SUBJECT, etc
I'm trying to setup a filter that will trap for our domain in the REPLYTO
and MAILFROM fields IF our domain is specified.
In other words, rarely should you see and email address coming in from the
Adding to this, I use the mounted volume feature (added in
W2000 and to Unix on day 1) so that the filesystem seems seamless to
Imail/Declude/Sniffer, etc.
For example, I have the following
volumes:
C:\ System
e:\ Imail
F:\ Imail Spool --- Mounted to
e:\imail\spool
g:\ Declude
declude.exe -ver
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff
PereiraSent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 5:22 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] How to tell
which version I have
How can I tell which version of Declude Junkmail
I
Just install and then apply the hotfixes.
Nothing much else if you're doing an upgrade.
Oh, for Gateway setups, I disable the queue system and DNS cache.
Otherwise I've found that you run in the the possibility of putting your
main mail system on the skiplist.
Mark
-Original Message-
kMail] How to
tell which version I have
Uh...shouldn't that be "decude -
diag"?
Darin.
- Original Message -----
From: Mark E.
Smith
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 2:04 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMai
Stupid question but where/how can you use regEx in Declude?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 4:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] regEx question
Ok, I'm a bit of a newbit
Can you use RegEx in SpamChk?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Sanford Whiteman
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 5:14 PM
To: Mark E. Smith
Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] regEx question
Stupid question but where/how can you use
Does anyone know if there's a plug-in for Outlook that lets you easily see
the SMTP header?
We're doing massive re-tuning to our Declude Gateway system which sits in
front of a 15,000 user Exchange system which moves about 420,000 messages
through our 4 Declude inbound MX gateways a day.
For now
could be configured to view the entire message,
including headers, without any action.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Mark E. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 5:57 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Somewhat OT question...
Does anyone
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark E. Smith
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 3:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Somewhat OT question...
Outlook Express doesn't talk MAPI to an Exchange server
Anyone know how to report the SPAMCHK test weight in the SMTP header?
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe
I'm tinkering around with SPAMCHK and it recommends moving to a 0-100 scale.
Has anyone done this before? If so, should I just increase my current
weights proportionally from 0-20 to 0-100?
Thanks
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This
Does anyone have a decent filter for Newsletters, Yahoo/Google News Alerts,
etc?
We've re-worked out filters and everything's working well now except the
Requested Bulk email (Newsletters, automated mailings, etc).
Thanks
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
86 matches
Mail list logo
