Apparently I was too quick on the draw as this line has since been added to
the diag file:
04/16/2013 22:24:21.947[BB86F9-606322-C04138-958B5A-AB7343-94F75B]
IS INVALID KEY
Did someone say something about new keys?
-Original Message-
From: SM Admin
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013
AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?
License code is in the declude.cfg file
Sincerely,
Randy A.
-Original Message-
From: SM Admin [mailto:imailad...@bcwebhost.net]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 1:27 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail
Why the negative weight on Caution? What’s the logic behind that?
Thanks,
Ben
From: Pete McNeil
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 10:47 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?
On 2013-04-17 13:36, David Barker wrote:
SNIFFER
So what needs to be done with ClamAV?
-Original Message-
From: Matt
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 11:24 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] ***DECLUDE NO-AUTHENTICATION KEY***
It seems clear at this point that the failure of Declude's licensing
system is
I noticed today that Declude wasn't processing. I checked the diag file and
it has the usual entries at the top plus an entry at the bottom saying that
the Sniffer license is invalid. How is that?
So then I restarted the Declud service and now the diag file only shows
this:
Declude 4.12.02
Hi Dave,
Can you tell us who the owners are of Declude and in what state it is
incorporated? We might be able to find out if they’ve filed for bankruptcy or
other legal proceedings.
Thanks,
Ben
From: David Barker
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 1:47 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Hi Dave,
This sounds great. Do you foresee this being the end of development for
Declude? Do you know what happened to the new owners of Declude?
Thanks,
Ben
- Original Message -
From: David Barker
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 8:35 PM
Subject:
So, has no one still heard nothing from Declude? This is my favorite anti-spam
service and I would hate to lose them.
Ben
- Original Message -
From: declude
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 10:21 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?
Very succinct. But I need further explanation...
Forget forwarding. We'd like to keep it to off-load the server and network
traffic, but we can live without. However, I need one server to be both
recursive for our mail server and non-recursive for our authoritative zones.
We don't have to worry
accessible DNS services on the web or email
server to have recursion turned off.
Hope this helps,
Darin.
-Original Message-
From: SM Admin
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2013 1:55 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] why have spam scores jumped?
Thanks, Sandy. Of course
Thanks, Sandy. Of course, if I had understood everything perfectly (or even
reasonably), I wouldn't have had to post my questions here.
On our old DNS server that ran under Windows 2000 Advanced Server, you could
actually toggle Forwarding and Recursion separately. However, under Windows
2008
here
http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail@declude.com/ for the mail you’ve
missed.
Andrew.
From: SM Admin [mailto:imailad...@bcwebhost.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 10:10 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] why have spam scores jumped
(I sent this message on Friday but it never showed up, so I thought I’d try
again.)
Hi,
I don't know if anyone is still here but I'd like some insights into some
strange anti-spam behavior.
We have latest SmarterMail and Declude, as well as Sniffer. Over the last few
days I noticed a
! Call us today!
From: SM Admin [mailto:imailad...@bcwebhost.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 1:52 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] why have spam scores jumped?
(I sent this message on Friday but it never showed up, so I thought I’d try
again.)
Hi,
I don't
morning - no change. Daily emails and voice messages remain unanswered.
This is very unusual. Maybe it's just this customer?
Steve
- Original Message -
From: SM Admin
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 10
Is it possible that they issued you a new key when you renewed?
And what emails did you write to?
Ben
From: Steve Cirivello
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 7:18 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: SPAM-LOW: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude subscription valid but IS EXPIRED
KEY in diags.txt
decludeproc several times a day since last Wednesday morning -
no change. Daily emails and voice messages remain unanswered.
This is very unusual. Maybe it's just this customer?
Steve
- Original Message -
From: SM Admin
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday
Hi Sandy,
I forwarded your last reply to Comcast but haven't heard from anyone there
since that last message where the tech says he can't help me any further.
At this point, I'd sure like to fight with them some more just because of the
obnoxious replies by Mr. Jones, but I'm not sure it's
Just for your amusement, here is my latest exchange with Comcast (read the
Comcast email first, then my response).
**
Dear Mr. Jones,
It does not surprise me that refuse to provide any further help. Your
previous emails displayed a dismissive and
I should add that the number of erroneous emails sent to the old mail server
has decreased. From Thursday through Saturday it went down to zero and I
was hoping the problem had gone away. Then it started up again on Sunday,
but at lower volume than before. Interestingly, most of the emails now
Hi Sandy,
Actually, you did catch something. The section that starts with Authority.
In his email he says Answer ns0.xname.org which I take to mean that he is
getting that authorotative response from nso0.xname.org and not ns1.xname.org
as you assume below. Which doesn't make sense to me
Hi Sandy,
Actually, you did catch something. The section that starts with Authority.
In his email he says Answer ns0.xname.org which I take to mean that he is
getting that authorotative response from nso0.xname.org and not ns1.xname.org
as you assume below. Which doesn't make sense to me
Hi Guys,
So, two questions: first, is there a version of p0f that runs under Windows?
I found the Unix version and I found a Windows-port version that is not
compiled (and I haven't used a real compiler in at least ten years).
Second question: what's the popular recommendation for DNS TTL
Hi Sandy,
Thanks for the info on TTL. We don't change very often and we're pretty low
volume, so 4 hours would be fine.
The link you provide is what I found before: it's a Windows port but it's
uncompiled. Lacking a compiler, I was looking for something precompiled.
Thanks,
Ben
Hi Shaun,
Thank you for a helpful response. I am CC'ing the list with this so I can
get your response posted there.
Thanks,
Ben
-Original Message-
From: Shaun Sturby
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 9:01 AM
To: imailad...@bcwebhost.net
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] MX, DNS and
Hi,
First, I want to thank Shaun and Sandy for truly useful replies. Next, below
is a response from someone at Comcast – presumably an engineer of some sort.
I’m trying to fit together his comments (I find his tone pretty argumentative)
with the points made here. For examples, Shaun seems to
-Original Message-
From: Sanford Whiteman
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 11:55 AM
To: imailad...@bcwebhost.net
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MX, DNS and other weird stuff
[I'm not subscribed using this address, but it's the only one on my mobile.
Pls feel free to forward to the
such as mail.bcwebhost.net can be a host or a subdomain, but I
didn't consider the two phrases to be synonymous. And we don't have any
subdomains.
Thanks,
Ben
-Original Message-
From: SM Admin
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 12:22 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Fw: [Declude.JunkMail] MX, DNS
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Sanford Whiteman
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 10:37 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MX, DNS and other weird stuff
Thanks for the info. Is there any problem with using the same host name
for
both MX record and A
29 matches
Mail list logo
