Yes I think it should be possible. I think it is a great idea.
David Barker
From: Christopher Jaime [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 5:41 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WhiteListing Isses
David
David Barker,
As a feature request, is it possible to add an option
AUTOWHITELIST ON to ignore a user's self added
email address in their address book?
- Chris J.
- Original Message -
From: Michael Jaworski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, December
-UNSPEC-HIGH IP4Rlist.dnswl.org 127.0.10.3
-10 0
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott
Fisher
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2007 11:57 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting
/(there is another one too I think) in the test name.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 7:53 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting/negative weights
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting/negative weights with DNSWL.org
-David
I think you messed up on all the ones with a 0 in the third octet.
I also chose to run it only on the last header. I wouldn't whitelist/credit
on any information on any previous headers
Ewww. Look at all the return codes!
I'd be interested in seeing some rates. Does it hit enough to work?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary
Steiner
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 6:42 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject:
I'll give it a try. Here's what I will use/
DNSWL-FINANCIAL-NONEdnsbl %IP4R%.list.dnswl.org
127.0.2.0 0 0
DNSWL-FINANCIAL-LOW dnsbl %IP4R%.list.dnswl.org
127.0.2.1 0 0
DNSWL-FINANCIAL-MEDIUM dnsbl %IP4R%.list.dnswl.org
127.0.2.2
How about negative weighting instead of
whitelisting.
If you want to do it selectively, you can create a
quick Declude filter that you give a high negative weight to, and only include
the domains that you want to pass through based on having REVDNS
entries.
Darin.
- Original Message
Craig, I don't use any of the Declude WHITELIST features
due to the potential for giving the sender carte blanche access; if a known good
sender is sending crap, I still want to have a chance to block the
crap.
What I do is counterweight.
I create a filter file called, say,
On Nov 8, 2006, at 1:24 PM, Craig Edmonds wrote:
How can I whitelist based on Reverse DNS?
Create a filter with lines like
REVDNS xxx ENDSWITH .abcdefghi.com
where xxx is weight to apply. Xxx could be a very high number to
cause the message to be deleted or it could be a negative
Craig Edmonds wrote:
How
can I whitelist based on Reverse DNS?
REMOTEIP WHITELIST CIDR 64.4.240.0/20
REVDNS WHITELIST ENDSWITH .paypal.com
etc...
-Nick
Kindest Regards
Craig Edmonds
123 Marbella Internet
W: www.123marbella.com
---
This E-mail came from the
Absolutely,
WHITELIST REVDNS
.declude.com
You can alsocan create your own RDNSBL zone in your
DNS server (that's what I did) and create one for SPF domains that spammers set
up to reliably reject mail based on reverse DNS (thank you for them adhering to
SPF!).
Then
you set up a
PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting based on rev dns
Importance: High
On Nov 8, 2006, at 1:24 PM, Craig Edmonds wrote:
How can I whitelist based on Reverse DNS?
Create a filter with lines like
REVDNS xxx ENDSWITH .abcdefghi.com
where xxx
Evanitsky
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 12:56 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting based on rev dns
Importance: High
On Nov 8, 2006, at 1:24 PM, Craig Edmonds wrote:
How can I whitelist based on Reverse DNS?
Create a filter with lines like
REVDNS
:13 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting based on rev dns
Is the Reverse DNS in the headers anywhere? I've just been going out to
DNSReports.com and pulling it for the ones I want to add. Easier way?
Todd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Wednesday, November 08, 2006 1:13
PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE:
[Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting based on rev dns Is the Reverse
DNS in the headers anywhere? I've just been going out to
DNSReports.com and pulling it for the ones I want to add. Easier
way? Todd -Origina
: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 4:13 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting based on rev dns
Is the Reverse DNS in the headers anywhere? I've just been going out to
DNSReports.com and pulling it for the ones I want to add. Easier way?
Todd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
al Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
David Barker
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 9:30 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude?
To create a duplicate message for each recipient is not a tri
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
Whitelisting flaw in Declude?
Yeah, what Matt said.
Message splitting before junkmail
filtering would bepunishing for CPU time and somewhat more for disk time;
message splitting for the sake of whitelisting (or alternate actions)after
junkmail
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin
Bilbee
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 5:08 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude?
Delcude has always functioned like this.
What declude could do in this case is to duplicate
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude?
To create a duplicate message for each recipient is not a trivial issue.
This is a function of the mail server not Declude.
David Barker
Director of Product Development
Your Email security is our business
, October 18, 2006 12:06 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? - David Barker
David,
I agree.
But I do think the whitelisting needs to be changed. I think you should add
a WhitelistUnique tag.
EG:
WhitelistUnique TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The way the tag would function
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin
Cox
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 11:15 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? - David
Barker
Hi Dave,
A comment on the whitelist to required monitoring
Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG
Integration, and Log Parsers.
- Original Message -
From: Dave Beckstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 12:06 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? - David Barker
David,
I
, October 18, 2006 6:30 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude?
To create a duplicate message for each recipient is not a trivial
issue.
This is a function of the mail server not Declude.
David Barker
Director of Product Development
Integration, and Log Parsers.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Bilbee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 1:16 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude?
Other mail gateways do it. Why would it be so difficult to duplicate
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude?
Mail gateways or anti-spam products for mail gateways?
Darrell
---
-
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude
Of
David Barker
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 9:30 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude?
To create a duplicate message for each recipient is not a trivial issue.
This is a function of the mail server not Declude.
David Barker
Director
Beckstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 12:27 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? - David Barker
Darin,
We don't whitelist those addresses at all. But I could see other companies
wanting to do so.
This idea
Of
Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 10:48 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude?
Mail gateways or anti-spam products for mail gateways?
Darrell
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
David Barker
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 9:30 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude?
To create a duplicate message for each recipient is not a trivial issue.
This is a function of the mail server not Declude
If one user is whitelisted they all will be whitelisted for that email.
There are some things you can do to prevent this like BYPASSWHITELIST test.
Darre;;
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 11:25 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude?
If one user is whitelisted they all will be whitelisted for that email.
There are some things you can do
.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Dave Beckstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 3:11 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude?
I would call that a flaw, then, in how Declude processes the whitelist.
I have
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Darin Cox
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 12:37 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude?
It's actually more of an issue of how the mail server handles
if the email has multiple recipients and only one of whom
is in the whitelist?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin
Cox
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 2:37 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw
allow
everything else through.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Dave Beckstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 8:13 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude?
Hi Darin,
Thanks for the great explanation. You always
Title: Whitelisting not working for all items
Ive had the whitelist miss
addresses quite a bit Seems to work better for just @domain.com
and not the whole address in my situation
Cheers,
Sam
Samuel J Stanaitis, Network Administrator
Decorative Product Source, Inc.
(877)-650-8054
On Behalf Of IS - Systems
Eng. (Karl Drugge)Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 5:18
PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE:
[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address
Believe me, Id love to
find a way to do it, but when I HAVE to receive emails from hideously
mis-configured servers, whack-jo
Hi Brian,
Yes, this can be done with the Pro version. You can have per-user configurations. You can't not have Declude scan the mail, but you can set this individual's configuration to ignore all test results and deliver the mail. As far as I know, this shouldn't have any affect on other
We have found that if one of the addresses is whitelisted, then every recipient's address gets whitelisted. This may be unique to SmarterMail/Declude. I don't remember having the problem with IMail, but we haven't used it in over a year.Shayne Hi Brian, Yes, this can be done with the Pro
Can't he go into global.cfg and use
WHITELIST TO receiving_domain
or is that a Pro version thing?
John
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shayne
EmbrySent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 12:12 PMTo:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
Whitelisting email address
Can't he go into global.cfg and use
WHITELIST TO receiving_domain
or is that a Pro version thing?
John
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shayne Embry
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006
12:12 PM
Irecall that happening with IMail as
well. That is why I was wondering if I did something wrong
before.
Brian
- Original Message -
From: Shayne
Embry
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 1:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email
, 2006 2:16 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Whitelisting email address
Irecall that happening with
IMail as well. That is why I was wondering if I did something wrong
before.
Brian
- Original Message -
From: Shayne
Embry
What are you using for a hold weight and delete
weight?
Brian
- Original Message -
From: IS -
Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge)
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 3:17 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email
address
I can confirm
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006
3:38 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Whitelisting email address
What are you using for a hold weight
and delete weight?
Brian
- Original Message -
From: IS
- Systems
-Original
Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian
Sent: Tuesday, January
17, 2006
3:38 PM
To:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re:
[Declude.JunkMail]
Whitelisting email address
What are
you using for a hold weight
@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address
What are you using for a hold weight and delete weight?
Brian
- Original Message -
From: IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge)
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 4:28
PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Whitelisting email address
Karl,
Getting blacklisted for bouncing spam back to forged addresses would probably
be a lot worse than missing a stray message that shouldn't
@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address
Believe me, I'd love to find a way to do it, but when I HAVE to receive
emails from hideously mis-configured servers, whack-job citizens, and other
municipalities with less then stellar I.T. staff. from any where at any
time, not bouncing
@declude.com
Subject: Re:
[Declude.JunkMail]
Whitelisting email address
Karl,
Getting blacklisted for bouncing spam back to forged addresses would
probably
be a lot worse than missing a stray message that shouldn't have been
blocked. This certainly can happen, especially if you get a lot
Title: Message
I'm pretty confident that the "Skipping4 E-mail
from " means an address book whitelist.
- Original Message -
From:
Serge
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 3:35
AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]
Whitelisting
Hi
] Whitelisting
Messagethanks scott, that confirms my thoughts
- Original Message -
From: Scott Fisher
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 2:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting
I'm pretty confident that the Skipping4 E-mail from means
Title: Message
thanks scott, that confirms
mythoughts
- Original Message -
From:
Scott
Fisher
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 2:38
PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Whitelisting
I'm pretty confident that the "Skip
eaner
Internet"
- Original Message -
From:
David
Franco-Rocha [ Declude ]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 8:59
AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Whitelisting
Richard,
The problem here is, first of all, that Declu
- Original Message -
From: David Franco-Rocha [ Declude ]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 8:59 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting
Richard,
The problem here is, first of all, that Declude does not look at the cc: or
bcc: in the headers
Richard,
The problem here is, first of all, that Declude
does not look at the cc: or bcc: in the headers. It deals with recipients of the
email solely on the basis of what is in the message envelope (q*.smd file),
which is discarded by IMail after processing; all you eventually see is the
I messed that up, it should be 66.155.125.0/24
Matt
Chris Anton wrote:
Hi All,
Having trouble whitelisting a specific Class C IP range in Junkmail Standard. Using the "WHITELIST IP 66.155.125" in global.cfg (separated by spaces, not tabs). Syntax seems identical to the one listed in
Chris,
That's not a valid entry, you only have three of the dotted quads and
the Global.cfg requires either a full IP or a CIDR range. For the class
C you would want to use 66.155.125/24.
Matt
Chris Anton wrote:
Hi All,
Having trouble whitelisting a specific Class C IP range in Junkmail
Matt,
Thanks, that fixed it right away.
-Chris
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
someone please tell me that this was a joke.
- Original Message -
From: Imail Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 6:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain
Just curious: does SmarterMail use SMTP or something
I think it uses STP...The Racer's Edge.
- Original Message -
From: Imail Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 6:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain
Just curious: does SmarterMail use SMTP or something similar
No, it uses MTP, the precursor to SMTP.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 10:35 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain
I think it uses STP
PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 8:07 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain
No, it uses MTP, the precursor to SMTP.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser
Sent: Tuesday
e.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain
No, it uses MTP, the precursor to SMTP.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 10:35 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domai
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Imail Admin
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 5:10 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain
Alright guys, it was only a typo, no need to get in a huff. If you had
looked at Darin's message that I quoted, you would see he
: Dan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 8:07 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain
No, it uses MTP, the precursor to SMTP.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser
.
- Original Message -
From: Dan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 8:07 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain
No, it uses MTP, the precursor to SMTP.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain
Being in Florida, we use gators. We tried the usual pigeons
initially, but
they got eaten by the gators. Some of the messages actually still made it
to the intended destination as the gators sought out the
recipients' pools
: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Whitelisting our DomainSomeone reported recently that
WHITELIST AUTH won't yet work with SmarterMail because it isn't sharing that
information in a format that Declude can use, but apparently they are
considering adding it to their next major version.That's
: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 3:00 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain
See previous post
SmarterMail does support SMTP Auth but it does not at this time spaa that
info off to declude.
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
.
- Original Message -
From: "Darin Cox" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 5:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain
Being in Florida, we use gators. We tried the usual pigeons initially, but
they got eaten by the gat
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 3:06 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain
My reading was Declude uses the SmartMail Address book as it is used in
iMail but does not yet look at the white list feature in SmarterMail.
Michael Jaworski
Puget
I'm using IMail 7.14 and I noticted that in the Declude help page that
WHITELIST AUTH only works with V8 and above?
Is there any way to do this with V7.14?
Yes.
If all users send through your server, then use SMTP AUTH on all clients
and
configure Junkmail to whitelist AUTHing users. If
Yes.
If all users send through your server, then use SMTP AUTH on all clients and
configure Junkmail to whitelist AUTHing users. If not, but all mail comes
in from static IPs, you could use an IP whitelist to bypass for those IPs.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Stanford
, April 04, 2005 10:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain
I'm using IMail 7.14 and I noticted that in the Declude help page that
WHITELIST AUTH only works with V8 and above?
Is there any way to do this with V7.14?
Yes.
If all users send through your server, then use SMTP
the name of your domain
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 11:03 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain
Oops.. not that I know
the amount
low.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 11:13 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain
It depends on the reason for using WHITELIST AUTH if it is because outgoing
mail
@declude.com
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 11:13 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain
It depends on the reason for using WHITELIST AUTH if it is because
outgoing
mail is being marked as spam or held you can look at the settings and
ACTIONS in global.cfg also you could try
04, 2005 10:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain
I'm using IMail 7.14 and I noticted that in the Declude help page that
WHITELIST AUTH only works with V8 and above?
Is there any way to do this with V7.14?
Yes.
If all users send through your server, then use SMTP AUTH
Just curious: does SmarterMail use SMTP or something similar?
Ben
- Original Message -
From: Darin Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 7:39 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain
Yes.
If all users send through your
, December 20, 2004 6:17 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting Issue
Very Nice,
Should I add anything to the default.junkmail file?
EMERGENCYBYPASS WARN ??
Thanks,
Chris Patterson, CCNA
Network Engineer
Rapid Systems
-Original Message-
From
Chris:
We were having a similar issue- Scott suggested the following:
EMERGENCYBYPASS bypasswhitelist 40 2 0 0
So now if the weight passes 40 the whitelist will not work if 2 more people
are in the list.
You can adjust the settings per your environment.
Regards,
Kami
That is why whitelisting from or to an e-mail address is very touchy and
dangerous.
Why is anything for that user configured to be whitelisted?
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL
@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting Issue
Chris:
We were having a similar issue- Scott suggested the following:
EMERGENCYBYPASS bypasswhitelist 40 2 0 0
So now if the weight passes 40 the whitelist will not work if 2 more
people
are in the list.
You can
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting Issue
That is why whitelisting from or to an e-mail address is very touchy and
dangerous.
Why is anything for that user configured to be whitelisted?
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original
Chris Patterson wrote:
Hi all,
I am having trouble with an issue where spam is getting by showing
whitelisted in the header. Neither the domain or e-mail address that it
is coming from is whitelisted in the global config, nor are they showing
as Auth-user.
However, one of the
)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Patterson
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 3:22 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting Issue
He likes his spam.
I am wide open to better ideas, other than teaching
20, 2004 6:09 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting Issue
That is why whitelisting from or to an e-mail address is very touchy and
dangerous.
Why is anything for that user configured to be whitelisted?
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
Is there anyway we can whitelist a test?
With Declude we can have combination tests and tests that give weight
based on a combination of test names.. now I wonder if we can whitelist a
test name:
Whitelist Testsfailedspamcop :)
If we can do this it can help us with whitelisting based on
What I really want to do is WHITELIST these IP addresses for my domain
only.
That isn't currently possible.
Per-user/per-domain whitelisting is available for the return address, but
there isn't yet a way to have IP whitelisting on a per-user/per-domain basis.
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting IP Addresses
What I really want to do is WHITELIST these IP addresses for my
domain
only.
That isn't currently possible.
Per-user/per-domain whitelisting is available for the return address,
but
there isn't yet a way to have IP
Can you whitelist IP addresses via a file in global.cfg or only inline?
You can currently only whitelist IPs in the global.cfg file (WHITELIST IP
192.0.2.25).
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
on 4/16/04 8:39 AM, Kami Razvan wrote:
I know this has been discussed in the past but I am not sure if any solution
is available.
If one person has [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the address book it appears that an email
sent to this person and many others will be whitelisted for all.
We have a
If one person has mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] in the address book it
appears that an email sent to this person and many others will be
whitelisted for all.
Correct.
We have a situation that a person receives a lot of news emails and has
whitelisted his address. Now anything
Hi Scott,
Having added PREWHITELIST ON in my GLOBAL.CFG file, my server still
seems to be running the SPFFAIL test on 'local'/whitelisted IP
addresses. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Lyndon.
Email checked by UKsubnet anti-virus service
To prevent email
Having added PREWHITELIST ON in my GLOBAL.CFG file, my server still
seems to be running the SPFFAIL test on 'local'/whitelisted IP
addresses. Any ideas?
Are you running v1.70 or later? Do you also have a line PREWHITELIST OFF
(which could override the ON setting)? Where exactly is the
Sorry, I also have a WHITELIST AUTH.
Email checked by UKsubnet anti-virus service
To prevent email abuse block spam
contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: +44(0)8712360301 Web: www.uksubnet.net
Fax: +44(0)8712360300
Powered by UKsubnet Internet Service
Hi Scott,
I'm running 1.78i28.
PREWHITELIST is only entered once in the global.cfg, so no overriding. I
have 7 whitelist lines in the global.cfg, three are IP ranges, three are
domains, and the 7th is an ANYWHERE whitelist. In the Global.cfg,
PREWHITELIST ON is above my WHITELISTs (if that makes
1 - 100 of 183 matches
Mail list logo
