[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14640387#comment-14640387
]
Dominique Pfister commented on JCR-3226:
Looks good to me, Thomas, +1
stateCreated
+1
Cheers
Dominique
From: Tobias Bocanegra tri...@apache.org
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 4:55:40 PM
To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Filevault 3.1.16
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Filevault 3.1.16 release is
, Dominique Pfister dpfis...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to setup two distinct Oak repositories in the same VM, each
containing an OSGI whiteboard.
Looking at the components inside oak-core that announce their
availability using this whiteboard and the way the registration
Hi,
I'd like to setup two distinct Oak repositories in the same VM, each containing
an OSGI whiteboard.
Looking at the components inside oak-core that announce their availability
using this whiteboard and the way the registration is implemented in the OSGI
whiteboard, I was wondering
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominique Pfister resolved JCR-3368.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.8
Fixed in revision 1596550
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominique Pfister resolved JCR-3779.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.8
Fixed in revision 1596550.
Node.getPath
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14004613#comment-14004613
]
Dominique Pfister commented on JCR-3239:
Philipp, I'm unable to reproduce
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13939028#comment-13939028
]
Dominique Pfister commented on JCR-3743:
Hm, I'm unable to reproduce these failures
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13939210#comment-13939210
]
Dominique Pfister commented on JCR-3743:
bq. You'll have to check the code for any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13939210#comment-13939210
]
Dominique Pfister edited comment on JCR-3743 at 3/18/14 2:01 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominique Pfister reassigned JCR-3743:
--
Assignee: Dominique Pfister
Yeap, sure.
failing test if aws extensions
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13933074#comment-13933074
]
Dominique Pfister commented on JCR-3729:
Thanks, [~shgupta], this looks much better
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13933155#comment-13933155
]
Dominique Pfister edited comment on JCR-3729 at 3/13/14 12:15 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13933155#comment-13933155
]
Dominique Pfister commented on JCR-3729:
Patch revised and committed in revision
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominique Pfister updated JCR-3729:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
S3 Datastore optimizations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominique Pfister reassigned JCR-3729:
--
Assignee: Dominique Pfister
S3 Datastore optimizations
Hi,
I'm working on JCR-3729 which has fix version 2.7.5, and committed changes
to trunk. Now, I'm a bit confused: on one hand there is only a branch for
2.6, and trunk is on 2.8-SNAPSHOT, so is there some other place to apply
the patch so it'll be included in 2.7.5?
Thanks
Dominique
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominique Pfister reassigned JCR-3730:
--
Assignee: Dominique Pfister
Use object keys to create partitions in S3 automatically
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominique Pfister updated JCR-3730:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Patch revised and committed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominique Pfister reassigned JCR-3731:
--
Assignee: Dominique Pfister
Multi-threaded migration of binary files from FileSystem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominique Pfister updated JCR-3731:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Patch revised and committed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominique Pfister updated JCR-3732:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Patch revised and committed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominique Pfister reassigned JCR-3734:
--
Assignee: Dominique Pfister
Slow local cache built-up time
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominique Pfister updated JCR-3734:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Patch revised and committed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3733?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominique Pfister reassigned JCR-3733:
--
Assignee: Dominique Pfister
Asynchronous upload file to S3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3733?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominique Pfister updated JCR-3733:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Patch revised and committed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13933293#comment-13933293
]
Dominique Pfister commented on JCR-3729:
Thanks a lot, Shashank, for providing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13931567#comment-13931567
]
Dominique Pfister edited comment on JCR-3729 at 3/12/14 9:17 AM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13931567#comment-13931567
]
Dominique Pfister commented on JCR-3729:
[~shgupta], there are a couple of issues
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13931599#comment-13931599
]
Dominique Pfister commented on JCR-3729:
bq. They are re-factored jackrabbit-data. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13931614#comment-13931614
]
Dominique Pfister commented on JCR-3729:
bq. since changes are too large i advise
Hi,
I'm currently reviewing a patch submitted in JCR-3729, and when I try to
apply to trunk, it fails for various files, although the version it is
based on is the same as mine.
I realized that the files rejected all have CR+LF line terminators in my
checkout, although I'm working on Mac OS X,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13931823#comment-13931823
]
Dominique Pfister commented on JCR-3729:
Thanks to [~reschke] fixing the svn:eol
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13931823#comment-13931823
]
Dominique Pfister edited comment on JCR-3729 at 3/12/14 2:45 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13930750#comment-13930750
]
Dominique Pfister commented on JCR-3732:
[~shgupta], thank you for providing a patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13930844#comment-13930844
]
Dominique Pfister commented on JCR-3731:
[~shgupta], the patch provided doesn't work
Hi Jukka,
On Jan 9, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Dominique Pfister dpfis...@adobe.com wrote:
I’m working on an application packaged as an OSGI bundle that would perform
some validation and
store some auxiliary data
of this
“special” EditorProvider in Oak.with(…) fix it?
Thanks
Dominique
On Jan 9, 2014, at 4:54 PM, Dominique Pfister
dpfis...@adobe.commailto:dpfis...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi Jukka,
On Jan 9, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Jukka Zitting
jukka.zitt...@gmail.commailto:jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 9
And here's my:
+1
Kind regards
Dominique
On Sep 13, 2012, at 5:09 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Philipp Marx (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
Summary: MongoDB-based MicroKernel
This is a pretty major new feature so I'd like us to vote on whether
we want to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominique Pfister resolved OAK-216.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Dominique Pfister
Issue was caused by a wrong assumption
Dominique Pfister created OAK-231:
-
Summary: Support for large child node lists.
Key: OAK-231
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-231
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominique Pfister updated OAK-231:
--
Summary: Support for large child node lists (was: Support for large child
node lists
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominique Pfister resolved OAK-187.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Dominique Pfister
Fixed in revision 1365621
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13406910#comment-13406910
]
Dominique Pfister edited comment on OAK-114 at 7/5/12 8:30 AM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13407201#comment-13407201
]
Dominique Pfister commented on OAK-114:
---
bq.{quote} If we are keeping track of when
Hi Michi,
Yes, Tom experienced the same issue yesterday. I'm gonna have a look.
Thanks
Dominique
On Jul 4, 2012, at 11:23 AM, Michael Dürig wrote:
Hi,
I got a ConcurrentModificationException while checking the 0.3 release.
This didn't cause any test case to fail but was printed to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13294366#comment-13294366
]
Dominique Pfister commented on OAK-138:
---
@Thomas: I agree that other MK implementations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominique Pfister updated OAK-138:
--
Description:
As a further cleanup step in OAK-13, I'd like to move the packages
o.a.j.mk.client
,
On 23.5.12 13:45, Dominique Pfister wrote:
Hi Michi,
On May 23, 2012, at 1:38 PM, Michael Dürig wrote:
Didn't see it again up to now. I'll keep an eye on it. Is there any log
data that would be helpful if this occurs again?
Unfortunately not (yet), if it reappears, I'll add a logger
Hi Michi,
On May 23, 2012, at 1:38 PM, Michael Dürig wrote:
Didn't see it again up to now. I'll keep an eye on it. Is there any log
data that would be helpful if this occurs again?
Unfortunately not (yet), if it reappears, I'll add a logger to the mk
subproject and log messages in the
Hi Michi,
Seen this, too, very rarely though. Anyway, I created an issue for this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-107
Cheers
Dominique
On May 21, 2012, at 11:41 PM, Michael Dürig wrote:
Hi,
About every third build fails for me:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-82?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13269615#comment-13269615
]
Dominique Pfister commented on OAK-82:
--
Oops, that rationale slipped my attention even
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-56?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13267331#comment-13267331
]
Dominique Pfister commented on OAK-56:
--
On a related note, what's the status
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-56?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13267334#comment-13267334
]
Dominique Pfister commented on OAK-56:
--
commons and rename the package
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-78?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13264728#comment-13264728
]
Dominique Pfister commented on OAK-78:
--
There doesn't seem to be any need
.
Regards
Dominique
On Apr 3, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Dominique Pfister wrote:
Hi,
On Apr 2, 2012, at 7:28 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Stefan Guggisberg
stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com wrote:
i don't think that we should allow clients to explicitly extend the life
Hi,
On Apr 3, 2012, at 11:51 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Dominique Pfister dpfis...@adobe.com wrote:
I made a second thought, and I'm no longer sure I would allow
a revision to be reachable by some client interaction.
You'd drop revision identifiers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13227676#comment-13227676
]
Dominique Pfister commented on OAK-10:
--
I suggest we change it to int for both methods
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13227428#comment-13227428
]
Dominique Pfister commented on OAK-5:
-
What about this, Tom: I use Eclipse, too, and if I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13225293#comment-13225293
]
Dominique Pfister commented on OAK-5:
-
I think we should either put it all under
Hi,
On Mar 5, 2012, at 10:20 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
Note that if we do mandate orderability on child nodes, supporting
So in your model a tree is a node? A leaf is a property? What is a
branch, a child node?
I prefer using the same terms for the same things consistently. A node
Hi,
On Mar 5, 2012, at 1:40 PM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
Hi,
If we want to use distinct interfaces for read-only and writable
nodes,
what about ImmutableNode and MutableNode extends ImmutableNode.
That's troublesome because then a client that's given an
ImmutableNode
can't rely on the
Hi Michael,
Are you suggesting, that cluster sync will be provided purely by the underlying
NoSQL database? Until now, I always assumed that all cluster nodes expose an MK
interface, and that changes are transmitted to other nodes via calls on this MK
interface. So in your example, cluster
Hi,
On Feb 28, 2012, at 3:54 PM, Marcel Reutegger wrote:
I'd solve this differently. Saves are always performed on one
partition,
even if some of the change set actually goes beyond a given partition.
this is however assuming that our implementation supports dynamic
partitioning and
Hi,
On Tue 28, 2012, at 6:32 PM, Michael Dürig wrote:
On 28.2.12 15:40, Thomas Mueller wrote:
One reason to use the MicroKernel API is so we can implement a native
version of the MicroKernel. See also
http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/Goals%20and%20non%20goals%20for%20Jackrab
bit%203 - TBD -
Hi,
On Feb 29, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Marcel Reutegger wrote:
Hi,
On Feb 28, 2012, at 3:54 PM, Marcel Reutegger wrote:
I'd solve this differently. Saves are always performed on one
partition,
even if some of the change set actually goes beyond a given
partition.
this is however assuming that
On Feb 29, 2012, at 5:45 PM, Michael Dürig wrote:
That's an idea I mentioned earlier already [1]: make cluster sync
transparent to JCR sessions. That is, any modification required by the
sync, should look like just another session operation to JCR clients
(i.e. there should also be observation
Hi Michael,
On Feb 28, 2012, at 19:11, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Jukka,
Thanks for bringing this up. In a nutshell what you are proposing is to
implement trees as persistent data structures.
Hm, that's rather wishful thinking. Right now, we enforce an MVCC model inside
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominique Pfister updated JCR-3232:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.5
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13202417#comment-13202417
]
Dominique Pfister commented on JCR-3229:
Hi Mete,
Thanks for providing a patch. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominique Pfister updated JCR-3229:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Good, I applied your patch
Hi Felix,
On Jan 31, 2012, at 9:15 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi,
Am 30.01.2012 um 17:54 schrieb Dominique Pfister:
Hi,
Just stumbled across this compilation setting in microkernel's pom.xml:
plugin
artifactIdmaven-compiler-plugin/artifactId
Hi,
Just stumbled across this compilation setting in microkernel's pom.xml:
plugin
artifactIdmaven-compiler-plugin/artifactId
version2.3.2/version
configuration
source1.5/source
target1.5/target
Hm, no idea how this happened. No intention, though, I reverted the test
removal...
On Dec 13, 2011, at 2:52 PM, Michael Dürig wrote:
On 13.12.11 13:30, dpfis...@apache.org wrote:
Author: dpfister
Date: Tue Dec 13 13:30:13 2011
New Revision: 1213680
URL:
Affects Versions: 2.3.2
Reporter: Dominique Pfister
Assignee: Dominique Pfister
The cluster synchronization on a slave does always wait for some time (as
specified in the sync delay) before fetching changes. If a lot of changes are
being written to the master, a slave
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13145335#comment-13145335
]
Dominique Pfister commented on JCR-3138:
Hi Bart,
Thank you for your comment
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13145556#comment-13145556
]
Dominique Pfister commented on JCR-3138:
Hi Bart,
not quite: we already have our
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13003931#comment-13003931
]
Dominique Pfister commented on JCR-2910:
What about JackrabbitSession.getUser
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12995284#comment-12995284
]
Dominique Pfister commented on JCR-2874:
Good to know, Angela, but I don't think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominique Pfister updated JCR-2881:
---
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
Deadlock on version operations in a clustered
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominique Pfister updated JCR-2881:
---
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.2.2)
2.2.3
Status: Patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominique Pfister updated JCR-2881:
---
Attachment: jackrabbit-core-2.2.3.patch
Patch
Deadlock on version operations in a clustered
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominique Pfister updated JCR-2881:
---
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Patch submitted.
Deadlock on version operations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12991326#comment-12991326
]
Dominique Pfister commented on JCR-2881:
Solution looks as follows: when doing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12991326#comment-12991326
]
Dominique Pfister edited comment on JCR-2881 at 2/7/11 10:26 AM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12991327#comment-12991327
]
Dominique Pfister commented on JCR-2881:
Fixed in revision 1067901 in trunk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominique Pfister updated JCR-2881:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Fixed in 2.2 branch
Reporter: Dominique Pfister
When a timeoutHint other than Long.MAX_VALUE is given to the
javax.jcr.lock.LockManager API:
lock(String absPath, boolean isDeep, boolean isSessionScoped, long
timeoutHint, String ownerInfo)
a timeoutTime in seconds will be computed as follows
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12840571#action_12840571
]
Dominique Pfister commented on JCR-2523:
Hi Daniel,
JCR-1554 was fixed in trunk
I wouldn't call it error code, then: every time something changes
either in the calling code or in the code throwing the exception,
you'll get a different hash code.
Dominique
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Michael Dürig michael.due...@day.com wrote:
== Use Error Codes ==
What about using
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominique Pfister resolved JCR-2473.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Dominique Pfister
Thanks for detecting this issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominique Pfister updated JCR-2272:
---
Attachment: JCR-2272_NPE.patch
Applying the revised patch exposes another problem
Versions: 2.0-alpha3
Reporter: Dominique Pfister
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12729118#action_12729118
]
Dominique Pfister commented on JCR-2199:
Allow subclasses of UserManagerImpl/UserImpl
Hi,
I was able to find out how those repository and repository.xml are
created; it is actually a combination of tests:
o.a.j.test.api.RepositoryFactoryTest#testDefaultRepository:
instantiates a TransientRepository with home=null/config=null and
o.a.j.core.RepositoryFactoryImpl registers this
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Jukka Zittingjukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have posted a candidate for the Apache Jackrabbit 2.0 alpha4 release at
http://people.apache.org/~jukka/jackrabbit/2.0-alpha4/
See the RELEASE-NOTES.txt file (also included at the end of this
message) for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominique Pfister resolved JCR-1441.
Resolution: Won't Fix
I don't insist on having this generic feature anymore, so I resolve
Affects Versions: 2.0-alpha1
Reporter: Dominique Pfister
Assignee: Dominique Pfister
Priority: Minor
Currently, checking whether a session is allowed to write to some locked node
or whether it is allowed to unlock it is quite spread throughout the code
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominique Pfister resolved JCR-2183.
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in revision 790892.
Provide overridables for lock checking
Components: config
Affects Versions: 2.0-alpha1
Reporter: Dominique Pfister
Assignee: Dominique Pfister
Priority: Minor
In RepositoryConfigurationParser, most *Config elements can be extended in a
derived class, e.g.
public LoginModuleConfig
1 - 100 of 311 matches
Mail list logo
