Re: [NOMINATION] New Apache OpenOfice Chair

On 12/03/2017 03:04 PM, Marcus wrote: With the past October board meeting I'm the project Chair since 13 months. So, when we follow our own (unwritten) rule to change the Chair every ~12 month, then it's again time to find a new one. Therefore I'm asking for PMCs and committers to step up to

Re: AOO 4.1.4 silent install

On 11/04/2017 06:21 AM, Marcus wrote: I need to know how to do an silent install with the current version(s). Is the following forum post still valid and working for 4.1.4? https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=74=28765=275147=unattended+install#p294593 Thanks Marcus

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.4-RC5 as GA

On 10/18/2017 07:18 PM, Gavin McDonald wrote: On 19 Oct 2017, at 9:39 am, Carl Marcum <cmar...@apache.org> wrote: Question.. If a PMC member cast a vote should it always be counted as binding whether stated explicitly or not? Yes, Gav… Thanks

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.4-RC5 as GA

On 10/18/2017 07:21 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Carl Marcum wrote: If a PMC member cast a vote should it always be counted as binding whether stated explicitly or not? Yes, it should. People add "binding" as a shorthand to mean "I am from the PMC" since a release cannot

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.4-RC5 as GA

On 10/18/2017 07:16 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 10/18/2017 3:39 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: Question.. If a PMC member cast a vote should it always be counted as binding whether stated explicitly or not? The vote counting is really only for ASF rule conformance. The way it really works

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.4-RC5 as GA

On 10/18/2017 03:11 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: We expect PMC members to have a deep sense of responsibility to their projects. When they cast a binding vote, we trust that they have satisfied themselves enough to warrant them casting the vote. That, alone, should be sufficient, imo.

[VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.4-RC5 as GA

Pescetti (pescetti) Carl Marcum (cmarcum) Roberto Galoppini (galoppini) Please let me know if you see any errors or omissions. Thanks to everyone who could participate. Carl - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr

Re: [CLOSED] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.4-RC5 as GA

On 10/17/2017 03:06 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: After several days of testing, including a replacement build for macOS, I feel comfortable in CLOSING the vote for release. And, with many more than the required 3 +1 (binding) votes, and no -1 votes, I call the VOTE as PASSING! AOO 4.1.4-RC5 (based

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.4-RC5 as GA

On 10/16/2017 03:45 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: -1, binding The macOS problem seems to me to be sufficiently serious that we cannot release RC5 with it. It has now been reported by two different users. I may change my vote based on future information. (If I were considering only my Windows

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.4-RC5 as GA

+ 1 (binding) steps I took. downloaded apache-openoffice-4.1.4-r1811857-src.zip from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.4-RC5/sources/ verified md5 and sha256 checksums and signature. built with all languages on fedora 20 x86-64. performed smoketestdoc macro and ran bvt

Re: Building Java code: Ant improvements, and better IDE integration

On 08/09/2017 01:50 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: Hi Building AOO's Java code is currently mostly done with dmake and gbuild. Both are ugly, unsupported by Java IDEs, and impossibly problematic with some development I've been doing, so I began looking for an alternative. It turns out we also

Re: A refactoring proposal

On 06/17/2017 01:52 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: Without going into details here, some recently fixed security issues have related to the use of fixed size arrays without bounds checks. In general, that is not a very robust programming practice. It depends on careful checking in the source code

Re: [discussion] Roadmap for Open Office

On 12/06/2016 01:39 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: I have created a page on the Confluence Wiki https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Roadmap I made a start, with Points that came into my mind without haveing to check on something. I thought we have in the upper Region our Release

Re: Configure error with jdk on Ubuntu

Hi Raphael, Just to be sure, did you have a path to the JDK like: --with-jdk-home=/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_60 I have successfully built with Java 7. Best regards, Carl On 11/27/2016 12:52 PM, Raphael Bircher wrote: Hi all I have a configure error "javac not found, please use --with jdk-home. I

Re: New Committer: Matthias Seidel

On 11/15/2016 01:27 PM, Marcus wrote: We as OpenOffice PMC are happy to announce that Matthias Seidel (mseidel) is a new committer in our project. Please give him a warm welcome. :-) Marcus (on behalf of the Apache OpenOffice MC) Welcome and congratulations Matthias !! Best regards, Carl

Re: New Committer: Peter Kovacs (petko)

On 11/14/2016 05:30 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache OpenOffice is pleased to announce that Peter Kovacs (petko) is now a committer on the Apache OpenOffice project. A warm welcome to Peter! Regards, Andrea, on behalf of the Apache OpenOffice PMC

Re: Back to the Project

On 10/15/2016 09:17 PM, Raphael Bircher wrote: Hi there I'm honest, I'm a bit surprised by this project. Some weeks there was rumors, that the project is dead, and some weeks later you put out the new version. I know exactly what it takes to release a new version of AOO. So congratulation to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.3 RC1

+1 Binding Source testing: Checked signature and hashes. Checked that the three source formats contain identical files. Built and tested en-US on Fedora 20 x86-64. Ran automated BVT tests and compared against current 4.1.2 install. (1 additional test passed than 4.1.2) Binary testing:

Re: Testing 4.1.3

On 10/03/2016 10:20 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: Hi Carl, On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 09:58:25PM -0400, Carl Marcum wrote: On 09/25/2016 10:33 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as there are binaries they can run. I can't start

Re: Testing 4.1.3

On 10/03/2016 09:58 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 09/25/2016 10:33 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period until we have a complete release candidate

Re: Testing 4.1.3

On 09/25/2016 10:33 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period until we have a complete release candidate.

Re: [VOTE] Recommend Marcus Lange (marcus) as the New Vice President for Apache OpenOffice

[X] +1 Approve [ ] 0 Abstain [ ] -1 Disapprove, with explanation Best regards, Carl - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [NOMINATION REQUEST] Next Chair of AOO Project Management Committee

+1 Marcus, Thanks for volunteering !! Carl On 09/14/2016 02:36 PM, Marcus wrote: I could write much and more but to keep a long story short: I will volunteer to take over the role as next Chair. Planned is a time frame of 1 year. But of course also a bit longer if it fits better for any

Re: Release manager for 4.1.3

On 09/07/2016 06:44 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 09/08/2016 12:38 AM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: I am volunteering to serve as release manager for 4.1.3. I may go on to be RM for 4.2, but we can see about that later. My objective is to complete 4.1.3 in November. If I succeed there will be no problem.

Re: Releasing OpenOffice 4.1.3 (reopening the AOO410 branch)

On 09/07/2016 06:40 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Recent events make it clear we will have to release OpenOffice 4.1.3 sooner or later, with some duplication of work with respect to 4.1.2-patch1 but with more clarity for those who couldn't see that we made a release last month. I'll thus

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

On 08/10/2016 03:09 AM, Jan Høydahl wrote: 9. aug. 2016 kl. 13.23 skrev Carl Marcum <cmar...@apache.org>: ... Could we use a cross-platform installer like izpack [1]? I started trying it out last weekend and it looks like it could do the job of running a rename script and c

Re: Resurrecting the subsequent tests

On 08/09/2016 12:21 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: Hi Now that the buildbots work, and we are planning to start with releases again, it would be nice to have a good set of tests to run against releases, and running them against nightly builds wouldn't hurt either. Our unit tests do run during the

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

On 08/05/2016 12:28 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: Branching off the part that is not about the Windows 4.1.2-patch1 [TESTING]. -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 15:52 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [TESTING]

Re: Building AOO for Windows 10

different networks/-settings but no change. Did this problem occur to anybody else? Thanks a lot so far! Best wishes, Dany On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 12:55 AM, Carl Marcum <cmar...@apache.org> wrote: On 08/07/2016 08:35 AM, Kirsten S wrote: Hello together, I am new to this list and new to t

Re: Building AOO for Windows 10

On 08/07/2016 08:35 AM, Kirsten S wrote: Hello together, I am new to this list and new to the AOO-Project. I've been trying to build AOO and to get the source code since yesterday. I followed the step by step guide in this link: https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

inal Message- From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 03:30 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows On 08/04/2016 06:52 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 08/05/2016 12:26 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 08/04/2016 02:21 PM,

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

On 08/04/2016 06:52 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 08/05/2016 12:26 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 08/04/2016 02:21 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 08/03/2016 05:31 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: Testing of an Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2-patch1 procedure is requested. The files to be used in testing are at

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 Source

+1 Approve VERIFICATION... I downloaded the patch from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-patch1/source/ $ md5sum --check apache-openoffice-4.1.2-patch1.zip.md5 apache-openoffice-4.1.2-patch1.zip: OK $ sha256sum --check apache-openoffice-4.1.2-patch1.zip.sha256

Re: Officially releasing a patch for CVE-2016-1513

On 07/31/2016 08:25 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 30/07/2016 Kay Schenk wrote: duplicate fixed libraries for Linux-32, and Linux-64 based on submissions from Carl, Damjan, and Ariel. I'd be happy to move these somewhere in the next day or so, but I don't know what versions we want to use.

Re: [VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.5-RC1

On 07/30/2016 01:37 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: Carl, I deleted the 0.1.4 Release extensions from < https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/devtools/>. - Dennis Thanks Dennis, I thought I'd get back to this later after the momentum picks back up. Although that seems to be

Re: Officially releasing a patch for CVE-2016-1513

Looks good to me. On 07/24/2016 05:37 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: While the severity of the security bug we disclosed http://www.openoffice.org/security/cves/CVE-2016-1513.html is not particularly high (it is classified as "Medium" with no known exploits and anti-virus software can detect

Re: [REPORT] AOO 4.1.2 Deployment and Take-Up through 2016Q2

Dennis, Thanks for putting this together. I sometimes forget how many people use AOO. Carl On 07/11/2016 07:23 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: [Statistics captured for the 2016Q2 report to the ASF Board] Deployment and Take-Up -- For the eight months since release of AOO

Re: Smoke Test to run on a built office

On 07/05/2016 07:42 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: Plz see http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@openoffice.apache.org/msg27036.html You probably want the qa tests, which run the (copied) Smoketest nowdays. Damjan On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 12:25 AM, Carl Marcum <cmar...@apache.org> wrote: Hi

Smoke Test to run on a built office

Hi all, Are there other automated smoke test macros or scripts other than noted below that can be ran on a built office to test basic functionality and make sure nothing major is broken? I found this wiki page [1] that references a sxw document that contains macros and will display a report

Re: problem downloading dependencies and building on Fedora x86-64

On 06/30/2016 11:36 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Carl Marcum <cmar...@apache.org> wrote: Hi all, I'm attempting a build of 4.1.2 on Fedora 20 x64 from downloaded source to closely match the same configure options as the release except for adding: --with-p

problem downloading dependencies and building on Fedora x86-64

Hi all, I'm attempting a build of 4.1.2 on Fedora 20 x64 from downloaded source to closely match the same configure options as the release except for adding: --with-package-format="installed" LANGS="ast bg ca ca-XR ca-XV cs da de el en-GB en-US es eu fi fr gd gl he hi hu it ja kid km ko lt

Re: help building on Fedora x86-64

Thanks Kay !! On 06/28/2016 11:23 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: On 06/27/2016 05:37 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 09/20/2015 02:10 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 20/09/2015 Carl Marcum wrote: I'm attempting my first AOO build and I'm using Fedora 20 x86-64 I think I have all the dependencies installed

Re: help building on Fedora x86-64

On 09/20/2015 02:10 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 20/09/2015 Carl Marcum wrote: I'm attempting my first AOO build and I'm using Fedora 20 x86-64 I think I have all the dependencies installed. You can verify it at https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Fedora_Build_Instructions (Fedora 19 will be OK

Re: Open Office with Oracle forms 10g

Hi Mohammad, I'm still not sure how your application is bootstrapping the office. There is some difficulty in bootstrapping the office and connecting when the AOO jars are not the ones located in the installation. The AOO jars are juh, jurt, ridl, and unoil. The ones you list look like they

Re: Open Office with Oracle forms 10g

Hi Mohammad, I'm not familiar with using Oracle forms. Please provide some more information about your application such as: Is this a stand-alone client application using the Java UNO jars? Which AOO jars are you using and how are they placed on the classpath? Was the successful test you

Re: Development updates

On 05/13/2016 08:08 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: With the current instructions, it takes me a total of less than an hour to do the downloads, signature checks, build, and test the built software. And I appreciate all your help. Thanks, Carl

Re: [DISCUSS] Issue 125954 unhiding "hidden" content on e-mail send of document

On 05/01/2016 07:56 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: -Original Message- From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2016 14:57 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Issue 125954 unhiding "hidden" content on e-mail send of document On

Re: [DISCUSS] Issue 125954 unhiding "hidden" content on e-mail send of document

sue 125954 unhiding "hidden" content on e-mail send of document On 04/26/2016 03:39 AM, Carl Marcum wrote: [ ... ] I think If there is one Email command, the user should then be presented a choice. It could just be a choice of 2 buttons. The checkbox I was thinking of would be in a

Re: [DISCUSS] Issue 125954 unhiding "hidden" content on e-mail send of document

On 04/26/2016 05:17 AM, Mathias Röllig wrote: As I remember the behaviour was changed long time ago (maybe in the time of StarOffice before OpenOffice) as a security issue. I a workflow inside a company it is possible, that a user doesn't know something about hidden text. And with the option

Re: [DISCUSS] Issue 125954 unhiding "hidden" content on e-mail send of document

On 04/25/2016 05:30 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: Hello all -- A patch has been submitted for Issue 125954. There is some support for the "un-hiding" of "hidden" content when sending a document as e-mail. Since the non-exposure of hidden content when sending a document as e-mail was apparently a

Re: [VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.5-RC1

+1 Approve (Binding) So please VOTE on releasing RC1 (as defined above) as Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.5: [ ] +1 Approve [ ] 0 Abstain [ ] -1 Disapprove, with explanation - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.5-RC1

This new RC adds Java 6 compatibility and I bumped the maintenance version to avoid repo conflicts. The release testing wiki page is updated and there is now a release preparation page completed as well. [1] [1] https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Groovy_Uno_Release_Preparation Thanks, Carl

[VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.5-RC1

This is for a source release of Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.5 from Apache OpenOffice and binaries made available from Maven via Apache Nexus. Source packages for RC1 are available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/devtools/ and the reference revision is r1740645. Binary Maven

Re: [VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4-RC2

This vote is closed and replaced with an update. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4

This vote is closed and replaced with an update. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4-RC2

On 04/21/2016 08:35 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 4/21/2016 3:12 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 04/21/2016 02:09 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: The .class files in the uploaded .jar were compiled with Java 1.8: Patricia@Jan2014Desktop /cygdrive/c/Users/Patricia/.groovy/grapes/org.openoffice/guno

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4-RC2

On 04/21/2016 02:09 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: The .class files in the uploaded .jar were compiled with Java 1.8: Patricia@Jan2014Desktop /cygdrive/c/Users/Patricia/.groovy/grapes/org.openoffice/guno-extension/jars $ !find find . -type f -name '*.class' -exec file '{}' ';' -print

Re: [VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4-RC2

+1 Approve (Binding) [ ] +1 Approve [ ] 0 Abstain [ ] -1 Disapprove, with explanation Carl - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4-RC2

signature from "Carl Marcum (CODE SIGNING KEY) <cmar...@apache.org>" gpg: aka "Carl Marcum (CODE SIGNING KEY) <carl.mar...@codebuilders.net>" gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indic

[VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4-RC2

This is for a source release of Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4 from Apache OpenOffice and binaries made available from Maven via Apache Nexus. Source packages for RC2 are available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/devtools/ and the reference revision is r1740035. Binary Maven

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4 - PLEASE VOTE

On 04/19/2016 06:29 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 4/19/2016 3:22 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 4/19/2016 4:20 AM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 04/18/2016 07:04 AM, Carl Marcum wrote: ... I have the most of what I wanted to add to the release testing page [1] done. If you would like to review

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4

On 04/18/2016 07:04 AM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 04/17/2016 08:48 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 4/17/2016 4:27 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 04/15/2016 10:01 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 4/15/2016 6:52 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 04/15/2016 09:21 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: ... Do I need

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4

On 04/17/2016 08:48 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 4/17/2016 4:27 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 04/15/2016 10:01 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 4/15/2016 6:52 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 04/15/2016 09:21 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: ... Do I need to run it in any particular directory? How

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4

On 04/15/2016 10:01 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 4/15/2016 6:52 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 04/15/2016 09:21 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: ... Do I need to run it in any particular directory? How does it find the .jar I built? It doesn't need to find the jar you built. There is one pre

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4

On 04/15/2016 09:21 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 4/15/2016 5:05 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 04/15/2016 07:12 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 4/15/2016 3:40 AM, Carl Marcum wrote: ... Did you have a chance to try the HelloTextTableShape.groovy test script that I placed in Bugzilla [3

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4

On 04/15/2016 07:12 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 4/15/2016 3:40 AM, Carl Marcum wrote: ... Did you have a chance to try the HelloTextTableShape.groovy test script that I placed in Bugzilla [3]? ... Instructions for running it? What do I need to set up? Hi Patricia, Download it from

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4

On 04/14/2016 10:18 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 4/14/2016 6:29 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 04/14/2016 08:10 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 4/14/2016 3:28 AM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 04/14/2016 12:57 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 4/6/2016 3:27 AM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 04/05/2016 09:57

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4

On 04/14/2016 08:10 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 4/14/2016 3:28 AM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 04/14/2016 12:57 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 4/6/2016 3:27 AM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 04/05/2016 09:57 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: I think you will get more votes with more instructions. I've

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4

On 04/14/2016 12:57 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 4/6/2016 3:27 AM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 04/05/2016 09:57 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: I think you will get more votes with more instructions. I've never done a gradle build, and have no idea how to do one. I'm sure I could find out

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4

On 04/13/2016 05:55 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: For me, the delay has been the combination of some non-Apache projects and Apache River needing some attention (I'm the PMC Chair). I put away my Linux system to make more room for sewing for a couple of weeks. Unfortunately, I will need to

[DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4

Does anyone else plan to vote on this or have any questions? Thanks, Carl - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Where to find information about *.xcu schema (extension, dev, toolbar)

On 04/07/2016 07:55 AM, Christian Giehl wrote: Hi, I'm currently working on a custom toolbar for my oo-extension. To create the visual appearance of the toolbar, I have to write an Addons.xcu file, which contains a custom xml. However, the tag names and attributes I found in the tutorial all

Re: Eclipse Module Export UNO -> OOo package does not proceed

On 04/06/2016 04:35 AM, Christian Giehl wrote: Hi, I'm fairly new on the field and wanted to start developing an extension to be used in Writer. I started on reading the wiki and just tried to follow the tutorial here: https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/JavaEclipseTuto Unfortunately when it

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4

On 04/05/2016 09:57 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: I think you will get more votes with more instructions. I've never done a gradle build, and have no idea how to do one. I'm sure I could find out, but that is going to take time. Hi Patricia, On Linux I usually use SDKMAN to manage my

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4

On 04/05/2016 01:36 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: Side question. -Original Message- From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2016 04:07 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4 This is for a source release of Groovy

[VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4

This is for a source release of Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4 from Apache OpenOffice and binaries made available from Maven via Apache Nexus. Source packages for RC1 are available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/devtools/ and the reference revision is r1737622. Binary Maven

Re: procedure for going from RC to release

On 04/03/2016 06:17 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 04/03/2016 09:42 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Carl Marcum wrote: I was looking at how some other projects handled "extras" things like this. Other projects designed their trees in a different way. I found Maven uses sub-folders under rel

Re: procedure for going from RC to release

On 04/03/2016 04:25 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Carl Marcum wrote: I hope you don't take my suggestion for disagreement. Of course not. Let's simply find together the right way to publish this source package in the tree. As I wrote, I am OK with adding devtools/ provided this doesn't break

Re: procedure for going from RC to release

On 04/03/2016 03:42 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Carl Marcum wrote: I was looking at how some other projects handled "extras" things like this. Other projects designed their trees in a different way. I found Maven uses sub-folders under release/maven for plugins, plugin-tools, etc,

Re: procedure for going from RC to release

On 04/03/2016 11:49 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 03/04/2016 Marcus wrote: Am 04/03/2016 03:34 PM, schrieb Carl Marcum: Are the artifacts and signatures copied to new names or recreated and signed? They are moved, using svn move. If it's for the NetBeans plugin you can look at the name

Re: procedure for going from RC to release

On 04/03/2016 11:41 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: The RC artifact that is approved as a release is the artifact that is released. If you check the last RC for AOO 4.1.2 at you'll see that the folder has the RC name, tied to the source tree.

procedure for going from RC to release

I'm looking for the procedure for how the approved RC files are released. Are the artifacts and signatures copied to new names or recreated and signed? I know where they go but not how the names are changed. Thanks, Carl -

Re: QA test improvements

On 03/30/2016 02:24 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: Hi I've made some improvements to our QA tests and would appreciate some ideas and feedback. In r1737135 I committed further changes to build.xml that make passing the long and painful -Dopenoffice.home=... parameter to ant unnecessary - if

Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

On 03/27/2016 10:59 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 3/27/2016 3:53 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 03/27/2016 05:01 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 3/27/2016 12:26 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: ... When we have three PMC members willing to commit to voting (at due time) on the NetBeans plugin

Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

On 03/27/2016 05:01 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 3/27/2016 12:26 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: ... When we have three PMC members willing to commit to voting (at due time) on the NetBeans plugin, this discussion will make sense. Otherwise we are wasting our time. I generally have at least one

Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

On 03/26/2016 05:58 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: -Original Message- From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 10:38 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans On 20/03/2016 Patricia

Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field

On 03/22/2016 05:02 AM, Marcus wrote: Am 03/22/2016 10:00 AM, schrieb Marcus: Am 03/22/2016 03:37 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: -Original Message- From: Pedro Lino [mailto:pedl...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 16:53 To: q...@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Can we add

Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field

On 03/21/2016 03:05 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: -Original Message- From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 10:22 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field Kay Schenk wrote: [

Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

On 03/20/2016 03:18 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: On 03/20/2016 09:48 AM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 03/20/2016 10:54 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: [BCC to the PMC] >From the Chair, If this is considered an Apache release and identified as provided by the Apache OpenOffice project, then the Apa

Re: [OT] ApacheCon

On 03/16/2016 08:23 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: Are any of you planning to attend the North America ApacheCon? I have not yet decided whether to go. Patricia - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

hrieb Andrea Pescetti: On 20/03/2016 Marcus wrote: Am 03/18/2016 12:19 AM, schrieb Carl Marcum: Do we need to treat the submission of plugin artifacts for availability at NetBeans.org and through their update mechanism as official project releases requiring a vote? ... @all: Is there anyt

Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

Hi All, Do we need to treat the submission of plugin artifacts for availability at NetBeans.org and through their update mechanism as official project releases requiring a vote? If so, what would the verification procedure look like? We had the first Japanese language update for our Apache

[DISCUSS] Release Groovy UNO Extension via Maven

Hi All, Prior to calling for a release vote I wanted put this information out here hoping a few people will try the test script and make sure it works for them and see if there are questions or concerns first. I have created a Maven bundle including source and javadoc jars and uploaded it

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Java Bootstrap Connector via Maven

The [VOTE] to Release Java Bootstrap Connector via Maven has passed. 3 binding +1 votes are necessary for the release. I will release the artifacts to Maven today. Tally: +1 Pedro Giffuni +1 Patricia Shanahan (binding) +1 Carl B. Marcum (binding) +1 Andrea Pescetti (binding) +0 Marcus Lange

Lines of Code

I just found this cloc tool and thought it would be interesting to run against my AOO working copy of trunk. (you need to use a fixed width font for everything to line up correctly) It counts files and divides up code from blank lines and comments. Not sure if everything is recognized correctly

[DEVTOOLS] Groovy Integration Road Map

Hi All, Apologies for the long post... Recently I have be proposing, calling votes and implementing various pieces of things related to Java UNO like adding the AOO Java UNO jars and the bootstrap-connector jar to Maven, etc, without really explaining what I'm working toward. The goal is to

Re: MLA Format for students

Hi George, Do you refer to the MLA formatting styles similar to the ones referred to here: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/01/ Thanks, Carl On 02/26/2016 08:56 AM, CascioGeorge wrote: To whom it may concern, I just wanted to throw out an idea. It would be nice to have a MLA

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Java Bootstrap Connector via Maven

I can postpone taking any action individually until the end of next week as I a can use a local Maven repo for what I need this week. The following week I'm doing a presentation on Groovy with OpenOffice so I've got some more time. Hopefully this will give anyone who hasn't had a chance to

[DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Java Bootstrap Connector via Maven

I will leave the vote open to see if it can reach quorum. If not by tomorrow, I will alter the organization in the pom.xml and submit to Maven as an individual as I need this jar in Maven to continue work on the Groovy UNO extension I'm working on. If it later reaches quorum I will complete

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Java Bootstrap Connector via Maven

Sorry forgot to change the subject to DISCUSS - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >