DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31117.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
/show_bug.cgi?id=31117
Struts 1.2.2 uses Java 1.4 Boolean.valueOf(boolean b)
Summary: Struts 1.2.2 uses Java 1.4 Boolean.valueOf(boolean b)
Product: Struts
Version: Nightly Build
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows NT/2K
Status: NEW
/show_bug.cgi?id=31117
Struts 1.2.2 uses Java 1.4 Boolean.valueOf(boolean b)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
+1
There are just going to continue to be endless messages on the lists if
1.2.2 is left as GA.
James
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 5:34 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.2 - downgrade quality
+1
David
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given the problems we've had with 1.2.2, I'd like to retract my +1 for
GA status.
If one or more of the other voters were to do the same, we could then
adjust the Struts Acquiring Page to reflect that Struts 1.1. is still
the best
point of view was that I put a checklist for
testing various JDK/Tomcat flavours in the Struts 1.2.2 release plan - but
it was removed. If they had been left in the plan then the JDK issues would
have been caught.
I've set up a new plan for Struts 1.2.3 on the wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts
distribution also
has the wrong jar as well :-)
Fooey. Odd. My local path says it's 1.1.3. Not sure what's wrong. I'll
check this later today.
The disappointing thing from my point of view was that I put a checklist for
testing various JDK/Tomcat flavours in the Struts 1.2.2 release plan
/tags-logic-el/uri
urihttp://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-tiles-el/uri
Regards,
Matthias
-Original Message-
From: Kunal Parikh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 9:15 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water
or
jakarata.apache.org/struts. Anyone know if this is an issue?
Niall
- Original Message -
From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 8:57 AM
Subject: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water
?
Niall
- Original Message -
From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 8:57 AM
Subject: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?)
I saw in CVS,
that URI for Struts-Faces
; prefix=f %
Matze
Niall
- Original Message -
From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 8:57 AM
Subject: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?)
I saw in CVS
On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 08:11:06 +0100, Niall Pemberton wrote:
The disappointing thing from my point of view was that I put a
checklist for testing various JDK/Tomcat flavours in the Struts
1.2.2 release plan - but it was removed. If they had been left in
the plan then the JDK issues would have
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 9:49 AM
Subject: Re: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?)
Those URIs in taglibs are only used AFAIK to locate a taglib from a JSP %
taglib % directive without having to set a
taglib element in web.xml.
Notice I submited
On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 00:22:42 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
Saw that. I just volunteered as RM... ;-)
Do you just want to roll and test it with the infrastructure issues resolved.
Or, do we want to apply some of the new patches, update the roadmap, and so forth?
-Ted.
Thanks Matthias.
I've updated the jsps.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 11:30 AM
Subject: RE: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?)
Niall
: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 8:57 AM
Subject: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?)
I saw in CVS,
that URI for Struts-Faces points
also to Jakarta:
urihttp://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-faces/uri
@struts-el:
only tiles-el points to jakarta
: Re: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 08:11:06 +0100, Niall Pemberton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin,
I tested out the Struts 1.2.3 binary distribution you uploaded. The JDK
issue is resolved but the wrong version of the validator jar is still
being
shipped. Now
- Original Message -
From: Nicolas De Loof [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 9:49 AM
Subject: Re: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?)
Those URIs in taglibs are only used AFAIK to locate a taglib from
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 07:03:43 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 00:22:42 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
Saw that. I just volunteered as RM... ;-)
Do you just want to roll and test it with the infrastructure issues resolved.
Or, do we want to apply some of the new
Yes, you're right. I missed that when I changed the others before.
Niall has already fixed this in CVS (6 hours ago).
-Original Message-
From: Kunal Parikh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 12:15 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2
Hi,
There's a saveErrors method in Struts 1.2.2 that takes an
ActionMessages object. This can cause a ClassCastException in
getErrors and addErrors, which expects an ActionErrors object.
I've added a patch, which would solve this issue. I'm a bit confused
if the use of ActionErrors
The Apache Struts team is extremely proud to announce the availability of
Struts 1.2.2. This release represents the first official release
available for General Availability since Struts 1.1.
You can find all of the features, enhancements, and bug fixes in the release
notes listed below. I
Susan Bradeen wrote:
And the biggest _THANK YOU_ to you, James, for leading the team through
the release process home stretch. Congratulations, Struts Team. Drinks all
around! :)
dittos to you guys. (Hopefully soon this lazy bumb typing this message
can try and get involved with actually
Has the home page's download links been updated yet? They still point
to jakarta's download page which only has the 1.1 release. Congrats
James, Ted, Martin, et al on the release. :)
Don
James Mitchell wrote:
The Apache Struts team is extremely proud to announce the availability of
Struts
Thanks Jim, Ted, Martin et al to make it happen
On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 07:19, James Mitchell wrote:
The Apache Struts team is extremely proud to announce the availability of
Struts 1.2.2. This release represents the first official release
available for General Availability since Struts 1.1
maybe it'd be a good idea to also post this announcement to the
announcements list at jakarta (since it has a large subscription base).
- robert
On 31 Aug 2004, at 15:19, James Mitchell wrote:
The Apache Struts team is extremely proud to announce the availability
of
Struts 1.2.2. This release
: [ANN] Struts 1.2.2 release is now available for download.
cool. is someone taking care of adding the news to the jakarta home
page? (if not, i can probably handle it.)
- robert
On 31 Aug 2004, at 20:58, James Mitchell wrote:
done.
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 4:19 PM
Subject: Re: [ANN] Struts 1.2.2 release is now available for download.
cool. is someone taking care of adding the news to the jakarta home
page? (if not, i can probably handle it.)
- robert
On 31 Aug 2004, at 20:58, James Mitchell wrote:
done.
--
James
No
- Original Message -
From: Michael McGrady [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 5:52 AM
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?
Niall Pemberton wrote:
I've just got round to testing Struts 1.2.2 and found
I just sent a post about how to get
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/binindex.cgi updated.
Funny, we are top level, but the signed release is still
'jakarta'-struts-1.2.2.xx
The mirrors are already picking up our release under
/www/www.apache.org/dist/struts/
I assume all we need now is to fix
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 16:04:36 -0400, James Mitchell wrote:
I guess all the jakarta references will be changed when we go to
svn.
Yeah, I thought about renaming them, but since that's still where the CVS lives, it's
not inappropriate. :)
-Ted.
I've fixed the symbolic links for the 1.2.2 release files so that they use
the standard 'current' naming in the top level directory, and created
symbolic links for the library distribution as well. So, other than the
'jakarta-' in the name, which I believe we're just going to leave this
time
- Original Message -
From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 7:21 PM
Subject: Struts 1.2.2 release distributions
I've fixed the symbolic links for the 1.2.2 release files so that they use
the standard 'current' naming in the top level directory
+1
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:25:27 -0400, James Mitchell wrote:
I have finished rolling the 1.2.2 release.
The acquiring page has been updated with the 1.2.2 release.
http://struts.apache.org/acquiring.html
I am +1 for making this GA.
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source
+1
David Graham wrote:
+1
David
--- James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have finished rolling the 1.2.2 release.
The acquiring page has been updated with the 1.2.2 release.
http://struts.apache.org/acquiring.html
I am +1 for making this GA.
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open
: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]
No, I'm not running with the torch, I'm trying to pass the baton. :)
If you (or anyone else) has run the Cactus tests since yesterday's code
changes, please feel free to update the Wiki.
* http
Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]
* I've tagged cvs with STRUTS_1_2_2 (from the wiki, or should
that have been 1_1_2?)
Either way, I've found a few items I want to update, can I remove
: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]
Run with it, James. If anyone wants to pitch in, they can. But this doesn't
have to be a one-person job. (Though there's not much to A1-A6.) Just keep
the wiki page (that Niall started) updated.
We
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 14:05:13 -0400, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ok, I accept the challenge.
If you could clarify something for me though:
* IIRC, this release needs to be voted GA by our [committers/PMC]
before we can announce the release as GA.
Has that vote
]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 3:00 PM
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 14:05:13 -0400, James Mitchell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ok, I accept the challenge.
If you could clarify something for me though
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
EdgeTech, Inc.
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx
- Original Message -
From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch
I have finished rolling the 1.2.2 release.
The acquiring page has been updated with the 1.2.2 release.
http://struts.apache.org/acquiring.html
I am +1 for making this GA.
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
EdgeTech, Inc.
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx
Since it only just went up, it'll be a few days before I'll be able to
do useful testing, so consider my vote pending at this point... ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:25:27 -0400, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have finished rolling the 1.2.2 release.
The acquiring
Yes, that's essentially what we've been doing. I run the Maven summary summary, and
then cut and paste the ones that matter under the various categories we've set up on
the Release Note page.
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 02:31:23 -0400, Robert Leland wrote:
You could use what maven produces when you
: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 11:56 PM
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2
I'll be tied up for some time yet. If anyone else can push this
along, please do.
-Ted.
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 06:02:18 -0400, Ted Husted wrote
I'm going to take a look at doing the release notes later. Do we need 1.2.2
release notes that document the changes since Struts 1.1 or do we just need
release notes with the changes since the Struts 1.2.1 beta?
I think they should be the full set since Struts 1.1 since that was the last
GA
The release notes just need to be updated since the last time I did them, probably
last month. That much I should be able to squeeze in. They run back to Struts 1.1. If
1.2.2 goes GA, we can start fresh and incorporate the prior notes by reference.
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 11:33:40 +0100, Niall
09, 2004 11:56 PM
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2
I'll be tied up for some time yet. If anyone else can push this along,
please do.
-Ted.
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 06:02:18 -0400, Ted Husted wrote:
Wheels on other carts started to squeak this week, and I haven't
tagged or rolled 1.2.2 yet.
One thing I'd
On 2 Aug 2004, at 02:33, Ted Husted wrote:
I think we'll just have to go with whatever is simplest, since no one
seems to have much time to volunteer to the process. Apparently, that
would be the Maven approach.
yep :)
if you take a look at the maven url
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:26:27 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think we're picky at this point. Either what Ant does or what Maven does
would be fine, robert.
I'm sure I'm missing something obvious here, but I guess I'm not clear
on where either Ant or Maven come in to getting
On 2 Aug 2004, at 22:13, Martin Cooper wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:26:27 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I don't think we're picky at this point. Either what Ant does or what
Maven does would be fine, robert.
I'm sure I'm missing something obvious here, but I guess I'm not clear
on
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 22:44:21 +0100, robert burrell donkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2 Aug 2004, at 22:13, Martin Cooper wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:26:27 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I don't think we're picky at this point. Either what Ant does or what
Maven does
I think we'll just have to go with whatever is simplest, since no one seems to have
much time to volunteer to the process. Apparently, that would be the Maven approach.
I appreciate your help in this, robert.
-Ted.
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:19:32 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
hi ted
hi ted
maven uses the standard apache fallback script (closer.cgi). this is
very, very to easy to use (just pass the release path through to the
script) but suffers from some drawbacks (the sums and signatures are
not readily available and no attempt is made to educate users about the
I don't think we're picky at this point. Either what Ant does or what Maven does would
be fine, robert.
-Ted.
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 22:35:15 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 28 Jul 2004, at 11:02, Ted Husted wrote:
snip
One thing I'd like to do first is to link our Acquiring page to
Wheels on other carts started to squeak this week, and I haven't tagged or rolled
1.2.2 yet.
One thing I'd like to do first is to link our Acquiring page to the Apache mirroring
system, so that the distribution hooks up to the preferred place. I haven't looked
into how that is done yet. If
Sounds very cool!
.V
Ted Husted wrote:
snip
One thing I'd like to do first is to link our Acquiring page to the Apache mirroring system, so that the distribution hooks up to the preferred place. I haven't looked into how that is done yet. If anyone else has a clue, please feel free to jump in.
57 matches
Mail list logo
