.
'works for me'
-Paul Querna
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 17:15:35 -0800, Roy T. Fielding wrote
-1. I'm still of the mind that _every_ release should be recreatable.
Anything we put out there is going to be at least perceived as
official,
and we should take that into account.
Every release is tagged. A tarball is not a
Based on the Patch by Tyler Riddle for 1.3, these patches add an
IndexStyleSheet for mod_autoindex in 2.0 and 2.1.
The version for 2.1 also handles XHTML.
-Paul Querna
also online:
http://force-elite.com/~chip/patches/httpd/mod_autoindex/
2.0-mod_autoindex.c.patch
Description: Binary data
(mass vhosting from
*sql), but i simply don't have enough time to work on this module with
my other commitments.
-Paul Querna
=1.567diff_format=h
It looks like it just never got pushed up to Apache 2.
-Paul Querna
Patch Online:
http://force-elite.com/~chip/patches/httpd/accept_filter/
Index: server/listen.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/httpd-2.0/server
Forgot the new Patch procedure. Now added to bugzilla as PR 26650:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26650
-Paul Querna
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 10:44, Paul Querna wrote:
This patch changes the default accept filter from dataready to
httpready. It will still use dataready
and other situations where
running under GDB is not feasible.
mod_backtrace is also no longer Linux specific, It can now work under
FreeBSD once 'libexecinfo' is installed from the FreeBSD Ports system.
Can we get some binding votes on this?
-Paul Querna
signature.asc
Description
to? This seems like a sensible solution to me.
-Paul Querna
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Users will not have to use libmap.conf. Hurrah, libc_r is
finally going away!
- Paul Querna
it.
Are you sure your machines are 4.9-STABLE and you are running the worker
MPM? Do you have something special in your configuration?
-Paul Querna
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
' a simple test.
What is your configure line?
What is httpd linked to? (ldd httpd)
I added --enable-nonportable-atomics, but it doesn't make any difference
for me.
Are you using the Apache 2.0.48 from the FreeBSD Ports?
-Paul Querna
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/bind.html#ipv6
It says this is the behavior default on FreeBSD, NetBSD, and
OpenBSD.(Not sure what is going on with your report mentioning Mac OSX).
Can you provide the exact Listen directives used in your test?
Thanks,
Paul Querna
signature.asc
Description
that huge if() from
getting any bigger or more complicated.
-Paul Querna
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
developers.
-Paul Querna
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
(or even more) types of filters. This
allows for cleaner control of the active filters in addition to making
it easier for everyone involved.
-Paul Querna
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 04:42, Eli Marmor wrote:
3. Ability to change any directive, from anywhere in Apache, on-the-
fly.
This 'feature' would make doing on-the-fly virtual hosting much much
easier.
So, what is the next step?
Anyone making up some plans?
-Paul Querna
signature.asc
://svn.outoforder.cc/svn/mod_transform/trunk/
We were planing on making our first public 'release' version in the next
day or so.
-Paul Querna
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
authentication stuff.
Speaking of that, Is there any reason mod_auth_ldap hasn't been moved
over to the AuthN/Z Framework?
-Paul Querna
are important to you? What hurdles
do you see to a successfully replacement? What other audiences should
we try to address?
Thank You,
-Paul Querna
,
- Paul Querna
into 2.0.50 before a release is made.
Thanks,
-Paul Querna
Index: mod_unique_id.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/httpd-2.0/modules/metadata/mod_unique_id.c,v
retrieving revision 1.50
diff -u -r1.50 mod_unique_id.c
--- mod_unique_id.c 9
actually asked Eddie about the possibility to get this into 2.0, as my
DUMP_MODULES stuff relies upon his IfModule Changes.
I see your point nd, but it would be nice if I knew when these cool
features would make it into any stable branch. (ie a 2.2 ROADMAP...)
-Paul Querna
Is it possible to have buildconf be run on the server when the CVS
Snapshots are made of httpd-2.0?
This is a common practice for open source projects with their CVS
snapshots, and removes extra dependencies on autofoo for users.
Thanks,
-Paul Querna
On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 20:18 -0700, Sander Temme wrote:
On Jun 23, 2004, at 6:17 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Is it possible to have buildconf be run on the server when the CVS
Snapshots are made of httpd-2.0?
This is a common practice for open source projects with their CVS
snapshots
for 2.3.0-dev ***
- Replace the Perchild MPM with a different/working model.
- Allow Arbitrary File Backends.
This is only my initial list, please comment and add more.
-Paul Querna
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 02:27 +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
Please test and cast your votes for release.
Good On FreeBSD 5.2.1
On Wed, 2004-07-14 at 09:01 +0200, Andr Malo wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified:.CHANGES
docs/manual/mod core.xml
include http_config.h http_core.h httpd.h
server config.c core.c request.c
Log:
Added
also had to change testpoll.c again because the kqueue and epoll
implementations will return their result set with a different order (but
the same sockets will still come..)
Thanks,
-Paul Querna
Index: poll/unix/poll.c
===
RCS
Sorry, this was intended for apr-dev, I sent it here on accident :)
On Sun, 2004-07-18 at 14:36 -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
The attached patch removes the double for() loops in both the KQueue
and epoll _poll() implementations. Both epoll and kqueue have a method
for associating arbitrary
based off of it) into CVS
soon. My basic question for the list is, are we better off modifying
the Worker MPM, or should we create a new 'event' MPM for now?
-Paul Querna
On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 15:22 -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
hmm, I guess this fell off the collective radar.
any comments? otherwise, I guess it's good enough and I'll just commit it
to both 2.0 and 2.1.
Looks good to me.
-Paul Querna
Geoffrey Young wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
the 2.0 branch was *always* Review first. Back porting
these changes does not seem right without proper votes.
The LDAP modules are also 'experimental' modules, and they have been
using votes for all of their back ports.
-Paul Querna
what the ARM4 Module does in Apache 2? It just
exposes Apache to the ARM4 management tools? Performance Stats? Makes
ASCII Art of Gnomes? I need some more details before I even want to read
the source code.
-Paul Querna
On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 12:29 -0400, Bill Stoddard wrote:
I've written
server/main.c, which I think is slightly
cleaner; it's useful for other modules too.
Yes, I wrote the Dump Modules stuff, and I like your method better. It
is *much* cleaner.
If there aren't any objections, I will commit this in a couple days.
-Paul Querna
Index: server/config.c
release.
-Paul Querna
Is your DefaultType set to text/html?
On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 01:54 +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
Hi all,
I have just set up the most recent httpd v2.0.51-dev tree, and have
configured a filter that strips leading whitespace from HTML:
AddOutputFilterByType STRIP text/html
The content is
On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 22:42 -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
Thinking about this a little more...
2) Add More Components to Bugzilla. Here is my list of components I
would like to see added for our Project:
- Windows Installer
- Windows Build
Are these really necessary? We have a build
on
or supporting them? It doesn't make sense for the 'Stable Branch' to
include them at all.
Any other opinions about not including these MPMs?
-Paul Querna
On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 18:12 +0200, Matthieu Estrade wrote:
Considering some experimental stuff is sometimes stable on some
plateform and still experimental because unstable on others, it could be
better to keep them in, just for users who want to try and help. If
these modules are deleted,
,
or any of the other experimental MPMs in the 2.0 Branch. People are not
providing patches for them.
-Paul Querna
On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 18:47 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* Florian Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
snip
Maybe replacing perchild with metuxmpm would be a good idea? metuxmpm does
basically the same, but in fact it works.
ACK.
We'd be glad to get it in the official tree.
of experimental.
Anyone against committing the attached patch?
-Paul Querna
Index: configure.in
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/configure.in,v
retrieving revision 1.267
(+|-)1 for it?
If I don't hear anything, I will do it in a couple days.
Thanks,
-Paul Querna
On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 08:14 +0200, Andr Malo wrote:
I'm rather for removing the whole crap from the default config and simplifiy
as much as possible.
A 30 KB default config, which nobody outside this circle here
really understands, isn't helpful - especially for beginners.
+1
important as more standalone
applications use APR.
Comments/Objections?
-Paul Querna
On Thu, 2004-09-16 at 18:13 +0100, Nick Kew wrote:
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Paul Querna wrote:
In most of the Apache 2.0.XX releases, we have been using a CVS snapshot
of APR and APR-Util.
I would like to make it an official policy that for the 2.2 cycle, we
will never use a CVS snapshot
we might as
well do it now, before we start on a new stable branch (2.2). Time for
another Vote?
-Paul Querna
On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 07:57 +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
I can't believe I am not in this list...
You made the proposal, but didn't say '+1', so at best, it was an
implied vote. :)
On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 07:57 +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
What are the barriers to moving to Subversion?
Other than making the actual decision? None.
I believe we might as
well do it now, before we start on a new stable branch (2.2). Time for
another Vote?
Here's my +1. I should
to be
included in CVS.
-Paul Querna
On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 13:12 -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
A straw-man proposal for a new config organization is at
http://www.apache.org/~slive/newconf/
Looks pretty good. I think this is a good direction to move.
Any reason the Netware MPM part cannot be removed from near the top?
} to use subrequests? If no
one objects, I will do it in a couple days.
Thanks,
-Paul Querna
Brian Akins wrote:
I would like to be able to have external logging, so I can rotate with
out a restart. I would also like to still be able to do graceful
restarts. I thought about using unix domain sockets. I didn't want to
replicate someone else's work. I couldn't find anything on google.
at committing your patch to httpd CVS.
I don't have any objections to it on a concept level, but I have not
reviewed your code in detail.
-Paul Querna
Rüdiger Plüm wrote:
Hi all,
as some people here are already talking about Apache 2.2, just a short
question:
Will there ever be a productive version of Apache 2.1 or is it planned to
rename the current Apache 2.1-dev into Apache 2.2.0 as soon as Apache
2.1-dev is
regarded feature complete and
to make their
stuff portable.
Stuff to make LDAP more portable should go into APR...?
-Paul Querna
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Topic for discussion: Add the FCGI proxy module to
the 2.2.x distro?
I personally would like to get the local-process spawning done first, or
has everyone pretty much given up on ever doing that?
Otherwise, I guess I'm a -0. I kind of want to have things worth
Tenivella Enrico wrote:
Hi all.
I read about tests tool for apache, I'm searching a script that read
from access.log and perform the same request (GET and POST) at the
same time
Apache Flood?
http://httpd.apache.org/test/flood/
Jim Jagielski wrote:
There is a lot of confusion where the users think that
simply adding the stickysession param to the http worker
attribute *adds* the required sticky session info (cookie).
I'm looking into adding functionality that actually
does that and therefore avoiding this large and
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
There is a lot of confusion where the users think that
simply adding the stickysession param to the http worker
attribute *adds* the required sticky session info (cookie).
I'm looking into adding functionality that actually
does
Mladen Turk wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=451582
Log:
Move new struct member to the end of the struct,
so we can keep the compatibility.
Sorry for nitpicking, but I am still missing the minor bump.
There was no 2.3 releases, so no need for
Mladen Turk wrote:
But the trunk is usually build as is with all custom modules.
What's the point of it if we need to preserve backward compatibility.
(For what version, SVN head from DD/MM/ or what).
When the first version gets tagged from trunk, then we can have a MMN.
Until then, the
Graham Leggett wrote:
Davi Arnaut wrote:
Have you seen my patch to address this issue ? IMHO, it is far less
complex and less expensive then the committed workaround.
No - I went through your patches in some detail, but I didn't see one
that addressed this problem specifically. Once
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Tue Oct 24 00:01:44 2006
New Revision: 467259
...
-rc = ajp_msg_create(r-pool, AJP_HEADER_SZ_LEN+1, msg);
+rc = ajp_msg_create(r-pool, 128, msg);
Please don't use an arbitrary number like this. Make a define, do
something, anything but a
When creating a subprocess (ie a CGI in this case), APR has several
choices on how to clean it up, when the parent process is exiting or
running a pool cleanup. Using apr_pool_note_subprocess, the choices are:
APR_KILL_NEVER -- process is never sent any signals
APR_KILL_ALWAYS
Graham Leggett wrote:
On Tue, October 24, 2006 9:31 am, Paul Querna wrote:
The prerequisite is that APR needs to be taught about this scheme, and
it has to work portably across all platforms.
No it doesn't. mod_disk_cache makes many assumptions about the
underlying OS, like how moving a file
Sven Köhler wrote:
Hi,
JSP (via mod_jk) and maybe other plugins sometimes flush the connection,
so that the browsers receive everything that's stuck in some internal
buffer. Here's a quote from mod_jk's docs:
mod_deflate supports metadata buckets of the FLUSH type.
The best solution (as
Graham Leggett wrote:
On Fri, October 27, 2006 6:05 pm, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
The purpose of that code was originally to make EnableSendfile Off
in the config file work. APR_HAS_SENDFILE only tells you that APR has
sendfile.
It still does that as far as I can see:
#if APR_HAS_SENDFILE
I think we have had enough -1s passed over the last couple days related
to mod_cache, that it indicates there is not a consensus on what should
be done, nor on how it should be done.
I think we need to stop committing code for a couple days, and try to
make a rudimentary plan for the intended
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 10/31/06, Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hypothetically, if somebody else cared to redesign the output filters
just
for the cache, and some effort was spent by that somebody else to make
sure any disruptive changes were either minimised or prevented where
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 10/31/06, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF EITO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That seems to be an important point to me. Although I never used
the fd caching of mod_mem_cache this would mean we actually would
have to dump this feature. This looks bad to me. Isn't this a showstopper
for
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over CHANGES and STATUS, I think we should
start thinking about a 2.2.4 release. Comments?
I offer to be RM.
I think we should start thinking about it too. I think we should also
consider requesting that APR{,-Util} 1.2.8 gets done by the APR
developers...
Brian has expressed interest in brining mod_wombat to the ASF.
Is there interest in this PMC to bring it in under us?
The overview of mod_wombat:
mod_wombat ( https://svn.i-want-a-pony.com/repos/wombat/trunk/ ) was
written primarily by Brian McCallister with random bits of help from
Garrett
Nick Kew wrote:
On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 10:16:33 -0800
Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian has expressed interest in brining mod_wombat to the ASF.
Is there interest in this PMC to bring it in under us?
Just to be clear about it: presumably you're proposing it have
a similar kind
Joachim Zobel wrote:
Hi.
To my surprise several people just expressed the opinion that LUA should
be part of the apache core in the long run. Could you explain for what
purposes you want to do this?
Because its fun.
Writing apache modules?
Nope. Right in the core. I would suspect it
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I am personally +0 on the idea, but my only reservation is that
we have too many eggs in one basket already. One of these days,
some kind soul will have the energy to build a CPAN-like module
registry and distribution mechanism.
We talked about this in good detail back
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Nov 12, 2006, at 12:50 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
FWIW, mod_mbox, which you listed as dormant, has had more commits in
the last 6 months than the 1.3.x branch.
BTW, are you talking about one of the mod_mbox branches? I saw only
a couple minor changes on trunk
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I am personally +0 on the idea, but my only reservation is that
we have too many eggs in one basket already. One of these days,
some kind soul will have the energy to build a CPAN-like module
registry and distribution mechanism.
We talked about this in good detail back
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is a vote to import mod_wombat under the httpd pmc.
mod_wombat is currently located at:
http://svn.i-want-a-pony.com/repos/wombat/trunk/
If the vote passes, mod_wombat will fill out the incubation paperwork at
Paul Querna wrote:
This is a vote to import mod_wombat under the httpd pmc.
+1 from me to import mod_wombat.
-Paul
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'd still like to push a 2.2.4 out, say VERY early in Dec.
There are some backports awaiting just 1 single vote
to be approved, and others which look VERY worthwhile
to be in this version. Let's all take some time and
look over them ;)
AFAIK, the only semi-blocking issue
Joshua Slive wrote:
On 12/6/06, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're up to two great answers to disable some output from the server
that isn't required by the HTTP protocol anyway:
1) modify the source
2) install third-party module
My support for the idea has nothing to do with
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 12/6/06, Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is: How does this interfere with my module? How can I ensure
that only one of us (mod_ssl or my module) is calling these both
functions? I cannot believe that there is no problem when my module
You just can't.
Trent Nelson wrote:
I'd personally prefer this sort of an approach to, say, relying on the
source tars that are manually rolled at release time.
Trent.
FWIW, there isn't much 'manually rolled' about it:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/dist/tools/release.sh
I've seen
... moving this over to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 12/28/06, Henk P. Penning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, Paul Querna wrote:
I migrated the wiki to eos this afternoon.
The only things still on ajax:
1) rsync.eu.apache.org (Used by many mirrors
Stefan Teleman wrote:
Hi.
Please find attached a small patch for apr/atomic/unix/apr_atomic.c.
This patch enables Solaris 10 atomic ops, and it is ISA independent.
This belongs on dev@apr.apache.org, not httpd-dev.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Sander Temme wrote:
...
I'd like to hear one more voice say this is useful to them, and then commit.
+1, its useful to me.
-Paul
Nick Kew wrote:
On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 09:11:16 -0500
Brian Akins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically, mod_memcache could have this config:
MemCacheServer memcache1.turner.com:9020 min=8 smax=16 max=64 ttl=5
MemCacheServer memcache4.turner.com:9020 min=8 smax=16 max=64 ttl=5
MemCacheServer
I believe the httpd project is ready for a push towards the next major
version.
I believe everyone involved has learned many things from 2.x. I wasn't
here for all of the early 2.x development, so it is very easy to say I
am naive in the scope of something like pushing for 3.0.
Today, I view
So, I've been kicking around some ideas about where I personally would
like trunk to go for a couple months now.
My personal goals for 3.0:
- Write some cool stuff, that is fun to hack on.
- Create an environment that encourages others to contribute, A project
this large cannot and should not
This proposed list of requirements for a 3.0 platform. this list enables
a 'base' level of performance and design decisions to be made. If others
can make designs work with 'lessor' requirements, all the better, but
I'm not worried about it.
Proposed Requirements:
- C99 Compiler.
- High
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Feb 13, 2007, at 11:32 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
I believe the httpd project is ready for a push towards the next major
version.
So do I. In fact I was just about to create a sandbox for that purpose
yesterday, but had to get the crypto stuff sorted out first
Joachim Zobel wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 13.02.2007, 23:33 -0800 schrieb Paul Querna:
- Build a cleaner configuration system, enabling runtime
reconfiguration. Today's system basically requires a complete restart of
everything to change configurations. I would like to move to an
internal DOM
I have created a file in svn to track the discussion about these ideas,
and others at:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/sandbox/amsterdam/ROADMAP
As new ideas were added later on in the thread, please add them to this
file.
Paul Querna wrote:
So, I've been kicking around some ideas
I don't think anyone has started on writing the board report for
February yet?
)
Anything else anyone can come up with?
Paul Querna wrote:
I don't think anyone has started on writing the board report for
February yet?
steve wrote:
On 2/27/07, Arnold Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nick already told you, that Apache allows you to choose. So simply use
the fast-cgi/mpm-event combo, if you like that best. And if you want to
evangelize the combo, nobody is stopping you.
I use this and it works fine.
Karl Chen wrote:
Would it be possible to connect to a non-SSL port, if possible, so
at least the string internal dummy connection shows up?
Even better would be to not show that string at all. When I
connect to httpd and close the connection without sending
anything,
Not sending
Erica Zhang wrote:
Hi,
I want to cache the responses for XMLHttpRequest, that is dynamic
content. I have configureed http.conf using Expires to add headers to
those responses. However, I still could not find those responses to be
able to be cached by use of web browser.
Some browsers (IE?)
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 3/16/07, Karl Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-03-05 13:24 PST, Joe Orton writes:
Joe On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 09:33:56PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 03/03/2007 05:47 AM, Karl Chen wrote: present. Also
other issues like noise in the log file.
1 - 100 of 928 matches
Mail list logo
