Re: Bugzilla Improvement to fix confusion Fwd: New Open Office account?

Hello All, On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 11:48:03AM +1030, David wrote: > I believe self service registration to Bugzilla has been disabled for > several years - see for example > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@openoffice.apache.org/msg39684.html Yes, and I agree that registration should be

Re: Bugzilla Improvement to fix confusion Fwd: New Open Office account?

> On Mar 27, 2024, at 5:34 PM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 27.03.24 um 23:21 schrieb Dave Fisher: >> It seems that it has become difficult to create a bugzilla account and we >> need to update our guidance/ >> I think that at a minimum we should: >> 1. Change the footer text on our bugzilla that

Re: Bugzilla Improvement to fix confusion Fwd: New Open Office account?

I believe self service registration to Bugzilla has been disabled for several years - see for example https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@openoffice.apache.org/msg39684.html Dave Fisher wrote: HI - It seems that it has become difficult to create a bugzilla account and we need to update our

Re: Bugzilla Improvement to fix confusion Fwd: New Open Office account?

Am 27.03.24 um 23:21 schrieb Dave Fisher: It seems that it has become difficult to create a bugzilla account and we need to update our guidance/ I think that at a minimum we should: 1. Change the footer text on our bugzilla that reads "In case of problems with the functioning of Apache

Re: Bugzilla - two requests

On 2022/06/08 18:29:32 Marcus wrote: > OK, you have now the access for editing all fields. > What about now? > Now it's working fine - just changed the Issue 100661. Thank you very much! Czesław - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Bugzilla - two requests

Am 08.06.22 um 20:03 schrieb Czesław Wolański: In Bugzilla nicht Neues... In other words I can edit the field in question (Issue 128515) and cannot (Issue 100661). OK, you have now the access for editing all fields. What about now? Marcus

Re: Bugzilla - two requests

Hi Marcus In Bugzilla nicht Neues... In other words I can edit the field in question (Issue 128515) and cannot (Issue 100661). Regards, Czesław - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional

Re: Bugzilla - two requests

Am 08.06.22 um 06:09 schrieb Czesław Wolański: On 2022/06/07 23:00:32 Marcus wrote: Am 08.06.22 um 00:54 schrieb Marcus: Am 07.06.22 um 21:36 schrieb Czesław Wolański: Many thanks for the prompt reply. Issue 1001661, logged in the "Latest Confirmation in" field shows "---" I cannot change

Re: Bugzilla - two requests

Hi Marcus, On 2022/06/07 23:00:32 Marcus wrote: > Am 08.06.22 um 00:54 schrieb Marcus: > > Am 07.06.22 um 21:36 schrieb Czesław Wolański: > >> Many thanks for the prompt reply. > >> > >> Issue 1001661, logged in > >> the "Latest Confirmation in" field shows "---" > >> I cannot change it. > > > >

Re: Bugzilla - two requests

Am 08.06.22 um 00:54 schrieb Marcus: Am 07.06.22 um 21:36 schrieb Czesław Wolański: Many thanks for the prompt reply. Issue 1001661, logged in the "Latest Confirmation in" field shows "---" I cannot change it. 1 digit too much. ;-) What is the right BZ ID? I did a quick test with [1]

Re: Bugzilla - two requests

Am 07.06.22 um 21:36 schrieb Czesław Wolański: Many thanks for the prompt reply. Issue 1001661, logged in the "Latest Confirmation in" field shows "---" I cannot change it. 1 digit too much. ;-) What is the right BZ ID? I did a quick test with [1] without problems. So, either it's just about

Re: Bugzilla - two requests

Hi Marcus, Many thanks for the prompt reply. Issue 1001661, logged in the "Latest Confirmation in" field shows "---" I cannot change it. Best regards, Czesław вт, 7 июн. 2022 г. в 21:28, Marcus : > Am 07.06.22 um 20:20 schrieb Czesław Wolański: > > I am trying to change the "Latest

Re: Bugzilla - two requests

Am 07.06.22 um 20:20 schrieb Czesław Wolański: I am trying to change the "Latest Confirmation in" field in Bugzilla issue (100661) but to no avail. Am I missing something? what do you mean with "but to no avail". What is exactly happening? Do you get any error messages? Or do you set a

Re: Bugzilla - two requests

Hi Marcus, all I am trying to change the "Latest Confirmation in" field in Bugzilla issue (100661) but to no avail. Am I missing something? Best regards, Czesław - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Bugzilla - two requests

Am 05.06.22 um 15:58 schrieb Czesław Wolański: Windows 11 was first released in October 2021. Maybe the time has come to add Windows 11 to the list of operating systems? interesting that it wasn't there until now. For the time being I have no right to modify e.g. the "Latest Confirmation

Re: Bugzilla - two requests

Hi all, Am 05.06.22 um 15:58 schrieb Czesław Wolański: > Hi, > > Windows 11 was first released in October 2021. > Maybe the time has come to add Windows 11 to the list of operating systems? > > For the time being I have no right to modify e.g. the "Latest Confirmation > in" field. > Can it be

Re: Bugzilla list_id parameter in URL question

Hi Marcus, Am 21.04.22 um 23:58 schrieb Marcus: > Am 21.04.22 um 23:43 schrieb Carl Marcum: >> On 4/21/22 4:15 PM, Marcus wrote: >>> Am 21.04.22 um 14:57 schrieb Carl Marcum: Does anyone know what the list_id parameter is for in the URL after a search? [...] >>> >>> I did a

Re: Bugzilla list_id parameter in URL question

Am 21.04.22 um 23:43 schrieb Carl Marcum: On 4/21/22 4:15 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 21.04.22 um 14:57 schrieb Carl Marcum: Does anyone know what the list_id parameter is for in the URL after a search? [...] I did a quick search with Google (bugzilla url list_id) and found this as first hit:

Re: Bugzilla list_id parameter in URL question

Hi Marcus and All, On 4/21/22 4:15 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 21.04.22 um 14:57 schrieb Carl Marcum: Does anyone know what the list_id parameter is for in the URL after a search? [...] I did a quick search with Google (bugzilla url list_id) and found this as first hit:

Re: Bugzilla list_id parameter in URL question

Am 21.04.22 um 14:57 schrieb Carl Marcum: Does anyone know what the list_id parameter is for in the URL after a search? [...] I did a quick search with Google (bugzilla url list_id) and found this as first hit:

Re: [Bugzilla] Increase Linux baseline to CentOS 6

As noted elsewhere, I use CentOS7 for our 4.2.X/trunk Linux 64 bit builds. > On May 1, 2021, at 5:35 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127513 > > Should this Issue not be adjusted? > > > All the best > > Peter > > -- > This is the Way!

Re: [Bugzilla] Increase Linux baseline to CentOS 6

Peter Kovacs wrote: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127513 Should this Issue not be adjusted? Yes, a few years passed in the meantime and indeed now CentOS 7 would be a better choice than CentOS 6, with maintenance guaranteed until June 2024. https://wiki.centos.org/About/Product

Re: [Bugzilla] Increase Linux baseline to CentOS 6

we can build branch 4.2 at Centos 7 and Debian 9 which is more like Centos 8 Kind regards Mectilde Am 01.05.21 um 11:35 schrieb Peter Kovacs: > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127513 > > Should this Issue not be adjusted? > > > All the best > > Peter > -- Mechtilde Stehmann ##

Re: Bugzilla: create account link missing

Hi, Am 17.01.21 um 16:16 schrieb Bidouille: > On main page, Bugzilla don't provide any direct hyperlink to create an > account. We had to disable user account creation because of too much spam. > > Note that "Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla User's Guide"[1] link returns to > an unexist page. >

Re: Bugzilla Account

Thank you! Eric From: Matthias Seidel Sent: Sunday, November 8, 2020 11:57 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Bugzilla Account Hi Marcus, Am 08.11.20 um 20:31 schrieb Marcus: > Am 07.11.20 um 13:51 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Am 06.11.20

Re: Bugzilla Account

Hi Marcus, Am 08.11.20 um 20:31 schrieb Marcus: > Am 07.11.20 um 13:51 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Am 06.11.20 um 00:41 schrieb Eric Tian: >>> >>> I’m very new to this project. I’m trying to get a OpenOffice >>> Bugzilla account but it seems that I can’t create one. Can anyone >>> help me with

Re: Bugzilla Account

Am 07.11.20 um 13:51 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 06.11.20 um 00:41 schrieb Eric Tian: I’m very new to this project. I’m trying to get a OpenOffice Bugzilla account but it seems that I can’t create one. Can anyone help me with this? Thank you! @Marcus: Could you create a Bugzilla account for

Re: Bugzilla Account

Hi all, Am 06.11.20 um 00:41 schrieb Eric Tian: > Hello, > > I’m very new to this project. I’m trying to get a OpenOffice Bugzilla account > but it seems that I can’t create one. Can anyone help me with this? Thank you! @Marcus: Could you create a Bugzilla account for Eric, please? ;-)

RE: Bugzilla Account

Hello Peter, I like to primarily work on UI design. Thank you. Sincerely, Eric Tian From: Peter Kovacs<mailto:pe...@apache.org> Sent: November 5, 2020 16:09 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org<mailto:dev@openoffice.apache.org>; Eric Tian<mailto:tian.e...@hotmail.com> Subject: Re

Re: Bugzilla Account

Hi Eric, Nice to see you switched from the recruiting list to the dev list. Welcome. We have switched of selfservice of Bugzilla account creation, due to the increasing support requests and spam attempts. For create an account we need your preferrd user handle. Thanks. What do you want to

Re: Bugzilla flags for 4.1.6?

Hi Marcus, Am 31.08.2018 um 22:41 schrieb Marcus: > Am 31.08.2018 um 16:06 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Am 28.08.2018 um 22:25 schrieb Marcus: >>> Am 28.08.2018 um 16:50 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Can someone please add the flags for 4.1.6 (Target Milestone, Last Confirmation) to Bugzilla?

Re: Bugzilla flags for 4.1.6?

Am 31.08.2018 um 16:06 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 28.08.2018 um 22:25 schrieb Marcus: Am 28.08.2018 um 16:50 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Can someone please add the flags for 4.1.6 (Target Milestone, Last Confirmation) to Bugzilla? I was only able to add Release Blocker. Either I am not able to

Re: Bugzilla flags for 4.1.6?

Hi Marcus, Am 28.08.2018 um 22:25 schrieb Marcus: > Am 28.08.2018 um 16:50 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Can someone please add the flags for 4.1.6 (Target Milestone, Last >> Confirmation) to Bugzilla? >> I was only able to add Release Blocker. >> >> Either I am not able to find it or my rights are

Re: Bugzilla flags for 4.1.6?

Thanks a lot! Matthias Am 28.08.2018 um 22:25 schrieb Marcus: > Am 28.08.2018 um 16:50 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Can someone please add the flags for 4.1.6 (Target Milestone, Last >> Confirmation) to Bugzilla? >> I was only able to add Release Blocker. >> >> Either I am not able to find it or

Re: Bugzilla flags for 4.1.6?

Am 28.08.2018 um 16:50 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Can someone please add the flags for 4.1.6 (Target Milestone, Last Confirmation) to Bugzilla? I was only able to add Release Blocker. Either I am not able to find it or my rights are not sufficient enough (most options are greyed out for me).

Re: Bugzilla / "Latest Confirmation in" is missing 4.1.5

Thanks! Although I do have some additional rights in Bugzilla, this one seems not to be included (or I wasn't able to find it) Matthias Am 27.01.2018 um 18:16 schrieb Marcus: > Am 27.01.2018 um 17:02 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Can someone add 4.1.5 to "Latest Confirmation in:" in Bugzilla? >

Re: Bugzilla / "Latest Confirmation in" is missing 4.1.5

Am 27.01.2018 um 17:02 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Can someone add 4.1.5 to "Latest Confirmation in:" in Bugzilla? done Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Bugzilla

> On May 20, 2017, at 9:11 AM, Hagar Delest wrote: > > Le 20/05/2017 à 12:10, Peter Kovacs a écrit : >> Our best recruitment base is our user base. The more we use them the tighter >> the link between user and developer gets, the more probable it is we get >> people.

Re: Bugzilla

PLEASE. These types of threads, whether valid or not, are completely orthogonal to the issue at hand and the *real* topic being discussed. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands,

Re: Bugzilla

> On May 20, 2017, at 5:11 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > We have way too many users to abandon the 4.x branch completely. We do need > to handle security issues. > ++1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Bugzilla information

I disagree. You have to make your point. Not to object will only strengthen other position because your view remains unheard. The best weapon against haters is love and dignity. Am 22. Mai 2017 18:32:39 MESZ schrieb esh1907 : >The way to treat such people: >1. Change our

Re: Bugzilla information

The way to treat such people: 1. Change our software license so any code sharing between us and them becomes impossible. 2. Arrange legally for the brand name they so desire to be forever unavailable even if our project will be terminated in the future. 3. Ignore them. On Sun, May 21, 2017 at

Re: Bugzilla

> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net] > > And the TDF should apologize for the FUD of the past and > dissociate oneself from the people who are today FUD! Public > and clear! > > If you care about this then you should discuss on the TDF > lists as an individual. This is not my

Project organisation (was Re: Bugzilla)

I do not disagree, Raphael. However I believe in making one step after another. First step is building up a core community. (Maybe it is there I just to blind to see it) If we have that we found a community organisation And stabilized our current situation, we can make the next step. We

Release Cycle( was Re: Bugzilla)

I agree we are round about at 1 release per year. We should target reliable 2 releases per year cycle. Important releases as needed. I think that cycle would be tough for us. Am 21. Mai 2017 16:34:31 MESZ schrieb "Jörg Schmidt" : > >> From: Dave Fisher

Re: Bugzilla

Honestly I agree with Dave. It does not help us. I think for now let Libre and Apache go different ways. That is the outcome of the past. Am 21. Mai 2017 17:02:43 MESZ schrieb Dave Fisher : > > >Sent from my iPhone > >> On May 21, 2017, at 10:44 AM, Jörg Schmidt

Re: Bugzilla information

The other offices are doing well. And competition is awesomely great. You have forgotten to mention some competitors that also put some awesome offers on the table. I like the diversity this is causing. I have joined in September last year and do not plan to swap project soon. I joined the

Re: Bugzilla information

I sometimes wonder if these people monitoring our mailing list don't have a real life... I know such zealots for almost 30 years now. They do not understand that people are free to do what they want and to use what they want. Matthias Am 21.05.2017 um 11:13 schrieb Marcus: > Am 20.05.2017 um

Re: Bugzilla

Sent from my iPhone > On May 21, 2017, at 10:34 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > > >> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net] > >> Here are some of mine. I am sure others differ. >> >> (1) investigate and fix security holes. > > +1 > >> (2) frequent releases. >

Re: Bugzilla

Sent from my iPhone > On May 21, 2017, at 10:44 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > > >> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net] > >> Meh had some misstatements of fact, > > And why are we silent about this? The misstatements are minor. Dennis's name and the count

Re: Bugzilla

> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net] > Meh had some misstatements of fact, And why are we silent about this? If AOO were my project, I would defend myself against such statements legally. As a community, we can not defend ourselves legally, but we should defend ourselves

Re: Bugzilla

> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net] > Here are some of mine. I am sure others differ. > > (1) investigate and fix security holes. +1 > (2) frequent releases. +-0 or -1 In practice, a time interval of 12-15 months would be sufficient. Note: the release cycle of LO is much

Re: Bugzilla

Waiting for an apology that's never going to come is not going to help. Meh had some misstatements of fact, but the description of other projects was interesting. I don't care to correct the misstatements. We have work to do here. Onward! Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On May 21, 2017,

Re: Bugzilla

> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net] > Reread what Simon wrote. Key phrase is those who work on both. > > Also IBM as a company left the project 2.5 years ago and Rob > left a year ago. Have the TDF members ever apologized for their insults to Rob (and other Apache members)?

Re: Bugzilla

Hi Jörg, Reread what Simon wrote. Key phrase is those who work on both. Also IBM as a company left the project 2.5 years ago and Rob left a year ago. In this case it is not helpful to reopen these hurts and past issues. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On May 21, 2017, at 9:11 AM, Jörg

Re: Bugzilla

Hi Jörg, To think positively what should be the project's development goals? I think if we are going to attract developers and companies we need an agenda or rough roadmap. Here are some of mine. I am sure others differ. (1) investigate and fix security holes. (2) frequent releases. (3) near

Re: Bugzilla

> Sent: Sunday, May 21, 2017 2:46 PM > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Jörg Schmidt > Repeating untrue statements This is not an untrue statement. > TDF has moved on I have experienced how high members of the TDF called Rob Weir as liars and attacked other members of Apache. And the same

Re: Bugzilla

Jörg On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > > Today the TDF is not independent, but depends on several companies, > instead of one. These companies may also be very community-friendly, but > again there is dependency and this dependency is actively

Re: Bugzilla

> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:peter.kov...@posteo.de] > Imho that's is what you have to do if you want to go into > commerce. And after we have rebuild the community we might > need to build or invite a commerce entity, too. Without hard > feelings. ;) > > What was the whish that the ooo

Re: Bugzilla

See below: Am 21. Mai 2017 10:01:17 MESZ schrieb "Jörg Schmidt" : > >> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:peter.kov...@posteo.de] > >> Imho looking for Companies & Investors is the route Libre is moving. > >One word: >The TDF is not the kind of foundation that the OOo community

Re: Bugzilla

Hi Peter Am .05.2017, 08:34 Uhr, schrieb Peter Kovacs : There are enough offices around. We have enough office suites who run all into the same direction, yes. But I think there is room for much more different office solution. Spend some time and read the feature

Re: Bugzilla information

Am 20.05.2017 um 21:35 schrieb Meh: Hey I saw the bugzilla thread and thought I'd share some info; another attempt to tell a story that only specific people want to know. How boring. Marcus -- Ciao Marcus - To

Re: Bugzilla information

> From: Meh [mailto:espri...@yandex.ru] > The only reason AOO still exists is a community of people who > ideologically believe that GPL/LO is bad and unrestrictive > licenses are great. No, that is not correct. Here at AOO are also people who do not agree with the TDF, which is not a

Re: Bugzilla

There are enough offices around. There is no point in starting from the scratch without any plan or vision. Imho looking for Companies & Investors is the route Libre is moving. I don't think doing the same is smart. I would rather prefer the opposite direction and focus on community building.

Re: Bugzilla

Hi - Sent from my iPhone > On May 20, 2017, at 4:43 PM, Raphael Bircher wrote: > > Hi Patricia > > Am .05.2017, 22:04 Uhr, schrieb Patricia Shanahan : > >> On 5/20/2017 9:07 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote: >>> Hi all >>> >>> Am .05.2017, 16:32 Uhr, schrieb

Re: Bugzilla

On 5/20/2017 1:43 PM, Raphael Bircher wrote: Hi Patricia Am .05.2017, 22:04 Uhr, schrieb Patricia Shanahan : ... A retired Sun or StarOffice person who understands how the code is put together could save me a lot of time. My current low level objective is to find where to put a

Re: Bugzilla

Hi Patricia Am .05.2017, 22:04 Uhr, schrieb Patricia Shanahan : On 5/20/2017 9:07 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote: Hi all Am .05.2017, 16:32 Uhr, schrieb esh1907 : Maybe we should try to locate and convince people who used to work during Star and Sun

Re: Bugzilla

On 5/20/2017 9:07 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote: Hi all Am .05.2017, 16:32 Uhr, schrieb esh1907 : Maybe we should try to locate and convince people who used to work during Star and Sun Microsystems to rejoin the project? I think this is the wrong way to go. We can't get the

Re: Bugzilla

Am .05.2017, 19:15 Uhr, schrieb Hagar Delest : Le 20/05/2017 à 18:07, Raphael Bircher a écrit : But companies don't com just to put money in, they want something back (normally). SUN and IBM was a big exception. The point is, we are not attractive for Companies at

Re: Bugzilla

Many companies were affected in the recent cyber attack. It shouldn't be hard to find a company sick of Microsoft... Why not Deutsche Bahn or Renault for example? On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Hagar Delest wrote: > The only one I would see is Canonical. But i still

Re: Bugzilla

Le 20/05/2017 à 18:07, Raphael Bircher a écrit : But companies don't com just to put money in, they want something back (normally). SUN and IBM was a big exception. The point is, we are not attractive for Companies at the moment. There is no room to make money. We should start getting

Re: Bugzilla

Hi all Am .05.2017, 16:32 Uhr, schrieb esh1907 : Maybe we should try to locate and convince people who used to work during Star and Sun Microsystems to rejoin the project? I think this is the wrong way to go. We can't get the good old time back. What we need is fresh

Re: Bugzilla

About the locate (from the wayback machine): https://web.archive.org/web/20040610062016/http://projects.openoffice.org:80/accepted.html About the convince: IMHO a personal meeting with a German volunteer is best. On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > If you

Re: Bugzilla

On 5/20/2017 7:32 AM, esh1907 wrote: Maybe we should try to locate and convince people who used to work during Star and Sun Microsystems to rejoin the project? If you can see a way to make this happen, it would be very helpful. Even having someone familiar with the source code available as a

Re: Bugzilla

Maybe we should try to locate and convince people who used to work during Star and Sun Microsystems to rejoin the project? Perhaps instead of votes users can offer monetary compensation for solving bugs (many users offering a tiny sum each can result in a reasonable incentive)? What about merging

Re: Bugzilla

Le 20/05/2017 à 12:10, Peter Kovacs a écrit : Our best recruitment base is our user base. The more we use them the tighter the link between user and developer gets, the more probable it is we get people. Community feeling is a strong motivator for doing the right thing. Well, remember that the

Re: Bugzilla

Our best recruitment base is our user base. The more we use them the tighter the link between user and developer gets, the more probable it is we get people. Community feeling is a strong motivator for doing the right thing. And people we have, we lack imho skill. And this we need to build. We

Re: Bugzilla

Le 20/05/2017 à 06:23, Jörg Schmidt a écrit : (a) We do not have enough developers (ok, we have to see what the future brings) Well, that's the key point I guess. (b) The existing developers work voluntarily and do what they want - how do we get them to fix _specific_ bugs? Please understand

Re: Bugzilla

Le 19/05/2017 à 13:04, esh1907 a écrit : IMHO good idea. Our suite should have a "Report a Bug" in Help menu under "About OpenOffice". I don't think such option would be first very visible and second very used. The average user shouldn't reach a cumbersome platform like Bugzilla to report a

Re: Bugzilla

I can give it a try (please bear in mind I read here out of curiosity, I'm not a developer). On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 9:23 PM, Marcus wrote: > @esh1907: > Are you ready to actually help here? > > Marcus > > >

Re: Bugzilla

Am 20.05.2017 um 06:23 schrieb Jörg Schmidt: From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] absolutely, we need volunteers that would then work on these bug reports. Assumed they *are* valid bugs and not "how can I do this and that" questions. ;-) yes, right, but that's not what I mean.

Re: Bugzilla

Hello, > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > absolutely, we need volunteers that would then work on these bug > reports. Assumed they *are* valid bugs and not "how can I do this and > that" questions. ;-) yes, right, but that's not what I mean. I mean we need developers who fix the

Re: Bugzilla

Am 19.05.2017 um 19:52 schrieb Jörg Schmidt: From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:legi...@gmail.com] Maybe this has been discussed already. But how about setting up some volunteer process from support request to bug report. Instead of having people write wildly in our tech tracker we organize or

Re: Bugzilla

IMHO good idea. Our suite should have a "Report a Bug" in Help menu under "About OpenOffice". The average user shouldn't reach a cumbersome platform like Bugzilla to report a bug. On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 9:49 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > Hi, > > Maybe this has been discussed

Re: Bugzilla refreshness

Ohh I did not see this. I will use this reason IRREPRODUCIBLE more often! Thanks Markus for pointing out. Marcus schrieb am Do., 9. Feb. 2017, 19:36: Am 09.02.2017 um 03:20 schrieb Peter Kovacs: > Can we rename the Status "Not an Issue" to "is not reproduce able"? > > I

Re: Bugzilla refreshness

Am 09.02.2017 um 03:20 schrieb Peter Kovacs: Can we rename the Status "Not an Issue" to "is not reproduce able"? I would also suggest to add a reason that expresses that this report needs to be adressed on user channels first. we need this status to express that the reported issue is really

Re: Bugzilla and Twitter

Am 11/11/2016 11:55 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: I have exhausted any ideas I have about this [;<). To complete my previous answer, the reason is simply that we were using Twitterfeed http://twitterfeed.com/ (see notice on the site about service shutting down on 31

Re: Bugzilla and Twitter

Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: I have exhausted any ideas I have about this [;<). To complete my previous answer, the reason is simply that we were using Twitterfeed http://twitterfeed.com/ (see notice on the site about service shutting down on 31 Oct) to convert Bugzilla feeds into Twitter

Re: Bugzilla and Twitter

Marcus wrote: Am 11/10/2016 04:56 PM, schrieb FR web forum: Twitter seems to be disconnected with Bugzilla https://twitter.com/aoobugs don't tweet any issues since 10-31-2016 @Dennis: As you are managing the Twitter account, can you help here? This is not the OpenOffice Twitter account. This

RE: Bugzilla and Twitter

> -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Friday, November 11, 2016 12:40 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Cc: Dennis E. Hamilton (Apache) <orc...@apache.org> > Subject: Re: Bugzilla and Twitter > > Am 11/10/2016

Re: Bugzilla and Twitter

Am 11/10/2016 04:56 PM, schrieb FR web forum: Twitter seems to be disconnected with Bugzilla https://twitter.com/aoobugs don't tweet any issues since 10-31-2016 @Dennis: As you are managing the Twitter account, can you help here? Has any service stopped and needs to be restarted/reconfigured?

Re: Bugzilla Upgrade

Hi all, FYI The Apache Infra team has updated the Bugzilla installation. At the first view it seems nothing has been changed, so the Look & Feel is still the same. However, when looking closer you will see some new fields: - New field "Alias" A short, unique name assigned to an issue in

Re: Bugzilla Upgrade

Mark Thomas wrote: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125762 Fix was easy that I expected. I just needed to apply a change to a custom template I missed when doing the upgrade. Should be OK now. I confirm the above URL is now displaying all links in issue comments correctly, thank

Re: Bugzilla Upgrade

On 05/11/2016 23:27, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 05/11/2016 22:12, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Hello Mark, >>> Something goes wrong with the display of SVN. It is oddly formatted... >> >> Indeed. Adding Mark to CC since I'm not sure he follows this list. > > Thanks. I don't

Re: Bugzilla Upgrade

On 05/11/2016 22:12, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Hello Mark, >> Something goes wrong with the display of SVN. It is oddly formatted... > > Indeed. Adding Mark to CC since I'm not sure he follows this list. Thanks. I don't follow the list. > Sample URL: >

Re: Bugzilla Upgrade

Matthias Seidel wrote: Hello Mark, Something goes wrong with the display of SVN. It is oddly formatted... Indeed. Adding Mark to CC since I'm not sure he follows this list. Sample URL: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125762 You can see a lot of links that should not be there (like

Re: Bugzilla Upgrade

> SVN Robot 2016-09-19 13:29:15 UTC > "hanya" committed SVN �0 > � into trunk: > #i125762# fix null pointer reference while accessibility related call Hello Mark, Something goes wrong with the display of SVN. It

Re: Bugzilla needs version 4.1.3 added

Am 10/21/2016 12:26 AM, schrieb Pedro: On 20/10/2016 19:05, Marcus wrote: Am 10/20/2016 02:48 AM, schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: Also what happened to 4.2.0-dev in the "Latest confirmation in:" field? do we want to have dev-builds in this field? These builds are changing day for day when using

Re: Bugzilla needs version 4.1.3 added

On 20/10/2016 19:05, Marcus wrote: Am 10/20/2016 02:48 AM, schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: Also what happened to 4.2.0-dev in the "Latest confirmation in:" field? do we want to have dev-builds in this field? These builds are changing day for day when using the install files from the build bots.

Re: Bugzilla needs version 4.1.3 added

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Marcus wrote: > Am 10/20/2016 02:48 AM, schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > >> Also what happened to 4.2.0-dev in the "Latest confirmation in:" field? >> > > do we want to have dev-builds in this field? These builds are changing day > for day when

  1   2   3   >