Sounds very cool!
.V
Ted Husted wrote:
snip
One thing I'd like to do first is to link our Acquiring page to the Apache mirroring system, so that the distribution hooks up to the preferred place. I haven't looked into how that is done yet. If anyone else has a clue, please feel free to jump in.
I don't think we're picky at this point. Either what Ant does or what Maven does would
be fine, robert.
-Ted.
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 22:35:15 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 28 Jul 2004, at 11:02, Ted Husted wrote:
snip
One thing I'd like to do first is to link our Acquiring page to
hi ted
maven uses the standard apache fallback script (closer.cgi). this is
very, very to easy to use (just pass the release path through to the
script) but suffers from some drawbacks (the sums and signatures are
not readily available and no attempt is made to educate users about the
I think we'll just have to go with whatever is simplest, since no one seems to have
much time to volunteer to the process. Apparently, that would be the Maven approach.
I appreciate your help in this, robert.
-Ted.
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:19:32 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
hi ted
On 2 Aug 2004, at 02:33, Ted Husted wrote:
I think we'll just have to go with whatever is simplest, since no one
seems to have much time to volunteer to the process. Apparently, that
would be the Maven approach.
yep :)
if you take a look at the maven url
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:26:27 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think we're picky at this point. Either what Ant does or what Maven does
would be fine, robert.
I'm sure I'm missing something obvious here, but I guess I'm not clear
on where either Ant or Maven come in to getting
On 2 Aug 2004, at 22:13, Martin Cooper wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:26:27 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I don't think we're picky at this point. Either what Ant does or what
Maven does would be fine, robert.
I'm sure I'm missing something obvious here, but I guess I'm not clear
on
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 22:44:21 +0100, robert burrell donkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2 Aug 2004, at 22:13, Martin Cooper wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:26:27 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I don't think we're picky at this point. Either what Ant does or what
Maven does
09, 2004 11:56 PM
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2
I'll be tied up for some time yet. If anyone else can push this along,
please do.
-Ted.
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 06:02:18 -0400, Ted Husted wrote:
Wheels on other carts started to squeak this week, and I haven't
tagged or rolled 1.2.2 yet.
One thing I'd
: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 11:56 PM
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2
I'll be tied up for some time yet. If anyone else can push this
along, please do.
-Ted.
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 06:02:18 -0400, Ted Husted wrote
, 2004 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2
We should probably get our Acquiring page pointing to a mirrored
distribution of Struts 1.1 first, to be sure that it works.
Then, we can submit Struts 1.2.2 for mirroring, and wait 24 hours before
announcing it.
I've never setup mirroring either, and I'm
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 16:04:36 -0400, James Mitchell wrote:
I guess all the jakarta references will be changed when we go to
svn.
Yeah, I thought about renaming them, but since that's still where the CVS lives, it's
not inappropriate. :)
-Ted.
The release notes just need to be updated since the last time I did them, probably
last month. That much I should be able to squeeze in. They run back to Struts 1.1. If
1.2.2 goes GA, we can start fresh and incorporate the prior notes by reference.
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 11:33:40 +0100, Niall
Yes, that's essentially what we've been doing. I run the Maven summary summary, and
then cut and paste the ones that matter under the various categories we've set up on
the Release Note page.
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 02:31:23 -0400, Robert Leland wrote:
You could use what maven produces when you
Ok, done.
I've been watching the mirrors, about 75% of them have picked up the
additions. When would you say is a good time for me to send out the
official release announcement?
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
EdgeTech, Inc.
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx
-
No
- Original Message -
From: Michael McGrady [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 5:52 AM
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?
Niall Pemberton wrote:
I've just got round to testing Struts 1.2.2 and found
/StrutsRelease123
Niall
- Original Message -
From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 6:28 AM
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 05:16:44 +0100, Niall Pemberton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 6:28 AM
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 05:16:44 +0100, Niall Pemberton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just got round to testing Struts 1.2.2
On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 08:11:06 +0100, Niall Pemberton wrote:
The disappointing thing from my point of view was that I put a
checklist for testing various JDK/Tomcat flavours in the Struts
1.2.2 release plan - but it was removed. If they had been left in
the plan then the JDK issues would have
On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 00:22:42 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
Saw that. I just volunteered as RM... ;-)
Do you just want to roll and test it with the infrastructure issues resolved.
Or, do we want to apply some of the new patches, update the roadmap, and so forth?
-Ted.
: Re: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 08:11:06 +0100, Niall Pemberton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin,
I tested out the Struts 1.2.3 binary distribution you uploaded. The JDK
issue is resolved but the wrong version of the validator jar is still
being
shipped. Now
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 07:03:43 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 00:22:42 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
Saw that. I just volunteered as RM... ;-)
Do you just want to roll and test it with the infrastructure issues resolved.
Or, do we want to apply some of the new
Yes, you're right. I missed that when I changed the others before.
Niall has already fixed this in CVS (6 hours ago).
-Original Message-
From: Kunal Parikh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 12:15 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2
: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]
No, I'm not running with the torch, I'm trying to pass the baton. :)
If you (or anyone else) has run the Cactus tests since yesterday's code
changes, please feel free to update the Wiki.
* http
Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]
* I've tagged cvs with STRUTS_1_2_2 (from the wiki, or should
that have been 1_1_2?)
Either way, I've found a few items I want to update, can I remove
: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]
Run with it, James. If anyone wants to pitch in, they can. But this doesn't
have to be a one-person job. (Though there's not much to A1-A6.) Just keep
the wiki page (that Niall started) updated.
We
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 14:05:13 -0400, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ok, I accept the challenge.
If you could clarify something for me though:
* IIRC, this release needs to be voted GA by our [committers/PMC]
before we can announce the release as GA.
Has that vote
]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 3:00 PM
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch to make sure ...]
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 14:05:13 -0400, James Mitchell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ok, I accept the challenge.
If you could clarify something for me though
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
EdgeTech, Inc.
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx
- Original Message -
From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 [was Patch
/tags-logic-el/uri
urihttp://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-tiles-el/uri
Regards,
Matthias
-Original Message-
From: Kunal Parikh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 9:15 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water
or
jakarata.apache.org/struts. Anyone know if this is an issue?
Niall
- Original Message -
From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 8:57 AM
Subject: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water
?
Niall
- Original Message -
From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 8:57 AM
Subject: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?)
I saw in CVS,
that URI for Struts-Faces
; prefix=f %
Matze
Niall
- Original Message -
From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 8:57 AM
Subject: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?)
I saw in CVS
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 9:49 AM
Subject: Re: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?)
Those URIs in taglibs are only used AFAIK to locate a taglib from a JSP %
taglib % directive without having to set a
taglib element in web.xml.
Notice I submited
Thanks Matthias.
I've updated the jsps.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 11:30 AM
Subject: RE: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?)
Niall
: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 8:57 AM
Subject: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?)
I saw in CVS,
that URI for Struts-Faces points
also to Jakarta:
urihttp://jakarta.apache.org/struts/tags-faces/uri
@struts-el:
only tiles-el points to jakarta
- Original Message -
From: Nicolas De Loof [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 9:49 AM
Subject: Re: URI in Struts-1.2.3 (was RE: Struts 1.2.2 Dead in the Water?)
Those URIs in taglibs are only used AFAIK to locate a taglib from
37 matches
Mail list logo
