Ah, I see what you guys are getting at: IRLP
First, that's INTERNET, NOT Amateur Radio! Radio's should be linked via the
AIR WAYS, NOT over phone lines. But that's MY opinion!
You're just trying to safe guard your personal information, which really
shouldn't be going over the Air Ways
I had mentioned cross platform development recently and wondered if Mono
could easily do the porting. It is not something that just happens, but
based upon the results of some competition, it does look like this is
doable:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=1022
73,
Rick, KV9U
Hi Dave:
MIN for 3.4 gig is 450 watts!! and if your going to run it hard.. 500 or more
Garrett / AA0OI
- Original Message
From: Dave Corio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 9:43:13 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Off-topic, but any
Pay attention Rod, you get it eventuallyit's called RADIO! (HI)
Original Message Follows
From: Rodney Kraft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have encryption
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007
My digital Ham station on 2.4 GHz is ALWAYS encrypted and the FCC said
that's
OK because we share that frequency with a portion of the Part 15 allocation.
Original Message Follows
From: Danny Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To:
The power supply has been changed once already, but that was
changing a 250-watt for another 250-watt. I can't just get a generic
power supply, as Gateway has a proprietary mounting system that a
generic won't fit into without a lot of drilling. I'm going to order a
450-watt unit from
Hi Dave:
I have no lost love for Gateway. but even worst yet is Dell.. if you check on
the computer you will find that Dell has one of the worst customer service
there is..
The only good way to get around this is to build it yourself.. Check out Newegg
or tigerdirect (newegg 1st choice)
Actually, Gateway's customer service has been pretty good. They had
the tech come to the house three or four times to do the repairs.
Unfortunately, anything that NEEDS to be repaired eight times has to
have started out as junk! I could understand a hard drive crash. Stuff
happens. But
Bruce,
You might want to post your rant to THE LEAGUE. You are preaching
mostly to the choir here. HI HI
Chuck AA5J
At 11:16 PM 4/27/2007, bruce mallon wrote:
OK
RM-11306 is on the back burner for now what will the
ARRL do next ?
Here is what they SHOULD do ...
ASK with a list of
1) Who are you talking to ? No one by the name BRFUCE
here must be a lost digital bit at 100 khz wide
2.4 ghz digi .
2) THEY are the ARRL
3)THEY are supose to do the will of the members
4)THEY don't seem intrested in doing THAT.
5) THEY should be asking for the members not the
I dont have a problem with MICROWAVE . NOR realy
on 75 meters however how do you control who gets on
and uses the band . how many unlicensed persons on
75 / 80 meters would it take for the FCC to shut all
digital encription down
--- John Champa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce,
Well I guess I will fight not to have encryption on ham radio but wait isn't
that what SCS/Winlink folks already have. Adapt or give in, mmmhh, I guess I
will not do neither but to continue to fight the commericalization of ham
radio..\
Kurt
- Original Message -
From: John Champa
I Bought two complete kits of comuter stuff from tiger, and got a heck of a lot
more than paying the same amount of money and buying one off the shelf unit.
I did have to replace one power supply, and one cd plalyer/recorder between the
two, in the last 3 years.
Danny Douglas N7DC
ex WN5QMX
You are correct and you do not have to deal with people in India to
get help. There is a book out, The world is flat, that very well
explains what is going on in the hi-tech companies.
At 10:51 AM 4/28/2007, you wrote:
Hi Dave:
I have no lost love for Gateway. but even worst yet is Dell..
Hello there,
Does anybody remember Packard Bell Customer service.
73 Gary WB6BNE
- Original Message -
From: Les Warriner
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 12:21 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Off-topic, but any help appreciated
You are
According to the latest ARRL Letter, the League has been asking people
for three years now and has received many responses. Withdrawing
RM-11306 now is one result of those responses.
73
Alan NV8A
On 04/28/07 12:16 am bruce mallon wrote:
OK
RM-11306 is on the back burner for now what
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, wa8vbx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well I guess I will fight not to have encryption on ham radio but
wait isn't that what SCS/Winlink folks already have. Adapt or give in,
mmmhh, I guess I will not do neither but to continue to fight the
commericalization of ham
Wow! One of the local head hunters...oppps, I mean
Professional Recruiters!...sorry... recently wanted me to
accept a job as a VP for off-shore technical resources.
Wonder if this is what he was writing about? (HI, HI)
Gotta buy that World if flat book! Tnx Garrett Dave!
73,
John - K8OCL
Kurt,
It is already here! We have been encrypting Amateur Radio Part 97 digital
traffic 24/7 on 2.4 GHz for years! It is expanding in use in the Amateur
Radio VHF UHF bands, but is not likely to be found on any HF bands as
international encrypted traffic is not permitted by the ITUbut
Bruce,
Current Amateur Radio Guidelines for the use of Encryption specify that
identification always be in the clear and that the encryption KEY be
recorded
in the station's log book in the event an ARRL OO or the FCC which to check
the
contents of the traffic to ensure that it complies with
Bruce,
Sorry for fat-fingering you name!
BTW, our HSMM signals on 2.4 GHz are 20 MHz wide, not 100 kHz!!!
That's why it's called Spread Spectrum...
Write the list of questions you think should be asked, and send them to
me and I will ensure they get published somewhere. That's what I do.
Then
John,
You might want to try PocketDigi for Windows or Windows Pocket PC. It
does a great job on CW over 25WPM and is free.
73,
Leigh/WA5ZNU
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 3:53 pm, John Champa wrote:
So there should NOT be any problemof course, CW above 25 WPM might
as
well be encrypted as far as I
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:18:42 -
cesco12342000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone started using it, and had any success?
Yes, it's useful.
From user guide:
Two numbers appear at the end of each line. The first number tells
whether the soft-decision Reed Solomon decoder failed (0)
Nice idea Andy,
should stir things up methinks.
Any room for a SWL class in the challenge ?
I think I can rustle up a couple of SWLs to take part.
73 and have a great weekend.
Brian
ZL2001SWL
EPC 002L
SWARL
_
Live Search
John Champa wrote:
So encryption is required to be used, and the League attorney
asked the FCC if that was acceptable and they said yes. The
FCC's reasoning was that it was NOT our INTENT (an important
legal concept) to obscure the communications. Our intent is
to PROTECT our HSMM Network
OPINION is still allowed in this country
When it's not there will be no need for HAM radio.
IF the ARRL feels it's members are slandering it then
let us know ..
--- John Champa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce,
Knock off the slander, OK? Many of use fine Ham
friends
who have worked
I am afraid many of them don't really care what you and I think about it.
In this atmosphere of fright, many think that if we DON'T do as they are
planning, we will loose our freqs totally. I think if we do it, we indeed
WILL loose our freqs. Thus it turns out to be a catch-as-catch-can
Dave, is it still under warranty? If not, it would be cheaper to take it to a
local shop and have them check it - of course - if this new power supply doesnt
fix the problem. I suspect it is NOT under warranty, or you would have been
able to ask Gateway for another supply.
FYI, we had over
If one does a web search you find a lot of comments about encryption and
amateur radio. But they mostly seem to come from one source. You and
your group. Just because you are doing something that may be illegal or
at least very borderline sub rosa type of activity does not mean that
the rest
Why I threw in the towel
It is still under warranty. In-home service, no less! The tech has been
here so often, we exchange Christmas cards!
Seriously, the reason I'm giving up on Gateway is the history with this
machine. We have purchased six desktops and a
Yawn. How about you move this ARRL rant somewhere else and let's stick to
digital radio stuff?
We've heard all this before , and still remain totally baffled over the US
ham's love of rules!!
John
VE5MU
- Original Message -
From: bruce mallon
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
My dream was / is an ADV 100 kHz channel up around
53 MHz where we could have ADV QSOs over 50 -100
miles without investing a fortune in antennas.
There are very few 6M FM repeaters in my area and the
local coordinators are happy to keep a few channels
uncoordinated for our ADV use.
John -
Bruce,
Yes, frequency coordination above 53 MHz would be a problem
when the band open, but I think we would have a few years
to work that out as the technology evolved from self-designed
kit modems, to publicly available kits, to a manufactured product
such as is sold for 4 MHz ATV at present.
Yepyou're are right. They didn't like policy recommendations. They
wanted on technical recommendations. But the WG got so frustrated with
the Board's flip flops on the issue (sound familiar?), that they all just
resigned
... in TOTAL... after one conference call in November 2006.
I still
Plato:
S--- slinging accomplishes nothing in a rational argument.
Or I think he wrote SOMETHING like that(HI)
John - K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re:
Nick,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Somebody finally figured out to ask the key question!
Nick gets an A+.
The League's attorney would not let us publish his FCC communications
and discussions on this encryption matter outside the WG (a couple dozen
Hams).
He couldn't even review and approved our
36 matches
Mail list logo
