Hi Wolf,
Here is the Centre of Activity frequency list
we have been using for RFSM8000 and MIL-STD 188-110
testing, file transfer, auto, and some images:
VFO FREQ KHZ / MODE=USB
1806.0
1840.5
3584.5
3626.0
7040.5
7065.0
7100.0
10142.5
14101.0
14112.0
14233.0
18104.5
18111.0
21116.0
Thank you for that explanation. I didn't know the modulation mode would
make
a difference. It would have been interesting to test the theory with Skip.
Unfortunately, we live too far apart for VHF/FM.
Thanks again...
Tony - K2MO
Tony,
You do not need to test only with me! You can test
If I wanted to setup a closed Digipreater on 145.09 Mhz on a high
mountain peak, so that I could limit activity to only ECOM traffic,
would the use of a CTSS tone decode be a viable option? Would a CTSS
tone interfere with Packet operations?
Maybe it was because of all the spam requests sent to join their group.
--- On Sun, 2/22/09, Rick W mrf...@frontiernet.net wrote:
From: Rick W mrf...@frontiernet.net
Subject: [digitalradio] illinoisdigital group
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, February 22, 2009, 6:24 PM
I
If it is true that Yahoo will just stop a group based on complaints,
then that is very troubling as it could happen to any group with
malicious activities by certain individuals making false claims.
However, he indicated that he had no warning from Yahoo.
As owner of another group that had
At the risk of stirring an unwanted debate, I for one DO consider
repeated join requests as SPAM. Why? Mark has repeatedly joined
other related groups and immediately started gathering names from
that group to solicit memberships in his group. I do know, from
personal experience, that there have
Just so I understand it, are you saying that he repeatedly sent join
requests to the same person (such as yourself)?
I personally don't consider a request to join another group to be spam
at all, but each to his own. I do know that there have been individuals
who were very pleased to join the
Isn't there a Yahoo Group concerning that mode MF Tele Type ?
Rick this is true but I must ask is there really a need to post it
to every ham list on yahoo? I was getting it 20 or so times.
On the list that I either own or moderate he was set to no mail.
This tells me one thing only. He did not want anything going to his
in box and must have been
I think that Yahoo has done the right thing, and I find it hard to
believe that Mark says that he had no warnings.
Myself as well as many others sent emails to Mark asking him to stop,
he choose not to reply to any eMails (to myself or others)
Marks actions were consistent with a spammer
I kept receiving join requests and lots of unsolicited postings - got fed up
with it but didn't complain, just put it down to him being very eager.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
- Original Message -
From: Rick W mrf...@frontiernet.net
Just so I understand it, are you
Rick Scott is right on with his comments.
Remember what Andy our list owner said in a post on Feb 19 09
at 02:37Z
I am guessing that it was taken down due to violation of Yahoo rules.
Several people have written to me privately complaining about what
they perceived as violations. I refrained
As more people try using digital modes on 2 meter FM, the overall best
performing mode will automatically surface, but for the longest
range on
digital modes (not counting CW), it is really necessary to use SSB,
and in
that case, we have found that MFSK16 is just too critical for tuning
to
Vojtech,
Another good suggestion! :-)
I see the wheels have been turning in Vojtech's mind!
RSID is already in fldigi, so will try that.
I hope others reading this will also try that, and all the modes, and let us
know their experiences. Testing is slowed down by the necessity to find
I didn't complain either, but after about 5 or so of his messages I
added this to my .procmailrc:
# advertisements in various Y! ham-radio mailing lists
*From: .*wb9...@yahoo.com
/dev/null
73 de kw6h, ex-ae6vw
Chris Jewell
Rick W wrote:
But I can see that receiving many repeated requests to be a bit
annoying. Whenever I have sent a request to an individual to join, it
has been a personal message and not something automated. Perhaps he was
using some automated technique and it wound up sending many duplicates?
DIRECT MESSAGE -
Rick
He was warn many many times.
People have been bitching at him for the last 2 years.
I was myself was not told if yahoo gave any warning but
one would think they did before taking any action.
But what I do know is that they (yahoo) saw the same post
going to some 43 list it
Rick,
Please read Yahoo's Terms of Use, which is at the bottom of each email. Pay
particular attention to the spam policy within the Terms of Use. It says in
there that your Yahoo ID can be terminated without notice for violating that
policy. What Mark was doing fits one of the examples of
First, I would not dismiss sound card modes. I think there is much more
that can be done with them. One of the main issues IMO is that they
don't (1) adapt to changing band conditions, and (2) don't utilize FEC
as much as is possible. (We also might need much better sound cards. The
study reported
John,
You have confirmed what others already know about P3.
I sold my PTC IIex last year, when the Winmor protocol was announced to
be in development.
It should introduce an ARQ mode to compete with P3, but will not replace
it.
I had the SCS in a go kit with either a Yaesu FT-897D or and
Hi John
I have had the same experience . I have also been testing the SCS PTC2
usb modem with a pactor3. Although I love Patrick's ale400 mode , I
have to admit ,
nothing can compete with the P3 mode.
73 de la5vna Steinar
John Bradley wrote:
As many of you know, I have been very
I only wish Yahoo would find another sponser for the group.
What happened to all the good information in the files section?
What happened to all the good information in the posts?
Who actually owns the posts by group members?
Are we all to be punished?
John, Exactly how does one actually contact
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Rud Merriam k5...@... wrote:
First, I would not dismiss sound card modes. I think there is much more
that can be done with them. One of the main issues IMO is that they
don't (1) adapt to changing band conditions, and (2) don't utilize FEC
as much as is
Hi John,
Let's reserve judgment just a bit longer. Maybe the performance of Winmor will
be good enough so that we won't need to buy the expensive modems. Maybe it
will listen before transmitting.
Now if they would modify the Winlink system so that it listened before
transmitting and there
I also own and or moderate groups in other endeavors.
Please check for your email preferences for each email address you use on
yahoo. If you leave one particular block unchecked, then a list owner/moderator
cannot send you invitations to join his group.
KE4MZ, Brent
Dothan, AL
Since illinoisdigitalham group is now gone, there
has been quite a lot of discussion about it.
It seems that Mark's rise to power as a group owner
and especially, as a moderator, was rather sudden.
Many of the successful group owners and moderators
have developed their groups over many years,
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Terry Breitenfeldt
tabreitenfe...@... wrote:
If I wanted to setup a closed Digipreater on 145.09 Mhz on a high
mountain peak, so that I could limit activity to only ECOM traffic,
would the use of a CTSS tone decode be a viable option? Would a
CTSS
Rick,
I think we have reached the point of beating a dead horse (so to speak)
But for the record, Mark never had the courtesy or respect, to reply to
a single person.
And most likely ignored Yahoo's eMails also.
I see that he removed all references to illinoisdigital group from his
QRZ
Rick,
I know for a fact that several members of this group (including myself)
complained directly to Mark about his REPEATED invitations (which he
ignored) so the complaints were forwarded to Yahoo.
Scott Gillis N3UJJ
http://n3ujj.com/hamshack.html My Hamshack
Chuck Mayfield wrote:
I only wish Yahoo would find another sponser for the group.
What happened to all the good information in the files section?
What happened to all the good information in the posts?
Who actually owns the posts by group members?
Are we all to be punished?
I know nothing
I would suggest that this topic be left alone. The Illinois group is
gone and I am sure the owner will do what he can to defend his
reputation. I do not wish to have this issue played out further via
the digitalradio group. Since Rick has confirmed what I suspected
(Yahoo took the Illinois
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, ea3aqs ea3...@... wrote:
Isn't there a Yahoo Group concerning that mode MF Tele Type ?
I am not sure but the author and many users are active in this group.
Andy K3UK
While the Pactor 2 and 3 modes are quite good, they do use a constant
100 baud signaling rate. SCS indicated a number of years ago that their
tests showed that with what at that time, they considered strong DSP,
the desire for improved data throughput and I think resistance to
Doppler, the
Something I forgot to mention earlier in suggesting a Pentium with
sound card might be usable as a dedicated DSP engine - the K6STI
software absolutely required an ISA SoundBlaster. If we want to
define a new DSP engine we need some higher level of abstraction
to be able to cope with hardware
Brent Gourley wrote:
Please check for your email preferences for each email address you use
on yahoo. If you leave one particular block unchecked, then a list
owner/moderator cannot send you invitations to join his group.
I believe the messages were sent direct via email, not through the yahoo
35 matches
Mail list logo
