On 2/26/2011 4:27 PM, Mark Preston wrote:
Thanks very much for this. I have the downloaded set-up files now and
will think hard on whether to install it or not - it has to depend on
how heavily we need the system working over the next weeks.
If this remains an issue, I can see it being a major
On 2/21/2011 4:16 PM, Mark Preston wrote:
I'm about ready to load up LibreOffice and start running it for work
but have really one simple question before I do. Background is I will
be running it on Windows Vista, currently run OpenOffice and will be
using it near daily including with MS Office
On 1/15/2011 8:30 AM, Francesc Mediterranean wrote:
Dear colleagues,
I write to you to ask for your opinion relating to the evolution of libreoffice.
I believe that could be very interesting to create a group for the creation of the
methodology of migration of libroffice . I propose that the
On 1/11/2011 3:10 PM, e-letter wrote:
Readers,
Admittedly not using LO but the predecessor calc, recently realised
that if a spreadsheet is created using calc and saved in native ods
format, upon open using m$excel the formulas of a cell disappear to
leave only the total value? Yet if calc is
On 1/2/2011 6:34 PM, Italo Vignoli wrote:
On 1/3/11 1:12 AM, Barbara Duprey wrote:
I was under the impression that the vanilla versions of Office since
2007 SP2 could read and write ODF formats, with no need to install any
plugins (but with their own special twist on ODF). From what you say
On 1/3/2011 4:55 AM, Zaphod Feeblejocks wrote:
snip
It may be that without explicity aiming to remove users from our sister, OOo,
aiming to take
the other 20% who do not use MSO 07 (plus those who do!) may be a more
effective way to
spread the file format. If we can get ODT used enough -
On 1/3/2011 3:06 AM, Davide Dozza wrote:
Il 02/01/2011 20:41, Charles-H. Schulz ha scritto:
[...]
inconsistencies. However, it's fortunately or unfortunately, should not be a
problem: OOo LibO implement the existing and used version of MS
*proprietary formats* used in MS Office 2007 and 2010
On 1/3/2011 10:26 AM, Italo Vignoli wrote:
On 1/3/11 3:40 PM, Barbara Duprey wrote:
Unfortunately, this means that most user-created documents going to
those with more recent versions of Office will be handled by the MS ODF,
which is especially unfortunate for spreadsheets. If we get
On 1/3/2011 11:19 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Barbara,
Le Mon, 03 Jan 2011 10:55:21 -0600,
Barbara Dupreyb...@onr.com a écrit :
On 1/3/2011 3:06 AM, Davide Dozza wrote:
Il 02/01/2011 20:41, Charles-H. Schulz ha scritto:
[...]
inconsistencies. However, it's fortunately or unfortunately,
why I think it's a good move to read them. The issue is about writing the Transitional
formats. Do you think we have to do that to claim the moral high ground?
On 01/01/2011 03:29 PM, Barbara Duprey wrote:
On 1/1/2011 11:07 AM, Zaphod Feeblejocks wrote:
Hi Sveinn,
Sure, but how about
On 1/1/2011 7:53 PM, Italo Vignoli wrote:
On 01/01/2011 11:29 PM, Barbara Duprey wrote:
Several of the comments here suggest a middle road, allowing the save
but with a message clarifying the limitations of the format (and perhaps
recommending use of the XP formats if interoperating with an MS
On 1/2/2011 12:01 PM, Craig A. Eddy wrote:
On 01/02/2011 10:46 AM, Lee Hyde wrote:
SNIP
My understanding is that Microsoft intends to implement strict OOXML
gradually, with each successive release of Microsoft Office using an
increasingly 'strict' form of transitional OOXML. Assuming
On 1/2/2011 12:47 PM, Italo Vignoli wrote:
On 1/2/11 7:15 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
No, that was not the point. Italo Vignoli wrote: LibreOffice writes
OOXML and will write OOXML, and this is
not under discussion. That is the point I objected to.
I might have been too harsh, but I reiterate
On 1/2/2011 2:29 PM, Italo Vignoli wrote:
On 1/2/11 8:15 PM, Barbara Duprey wrote:
Italo, one of the things that would make me (and maybe others here) feel
better about OOXML support is if writing to the XP formats causes LibO
to make compromises that do not have to be made going to OOXML
On 1/2/2011 4:56 PM, Bruno Girin wrote:
On 2 January 2011 17:19, Barbara Dupreyb...@onr.com wrote:
On 1/2/2011 2:29 PM, Italo Vignoli wrote:
On 1/2/11 8:15 PM, Barbara Duprey wrote:
[snip]
It would be good to know which works better for interoperability when sent
to an MS-only shop -- ODF
On 1/1/2011 11:07 AM, Zaphod Feeblejocks wrote:
Hi Sveinn,
Sure, but how about conservation and readability by future generations
(when there's no more Microsoft knowledge around and nobody knows
anymore how to decrypt all the nuances of.doc + .docx files) ?
Fair point.
But: most users do
OOo and LibO already do read those formats -- it's only the capability to write them that's an
issue. The Go-OO version and its derivatives, and as a consequence now LibO, write them, and
objecting to that is what started this whole (enormous) thread. The standard as written already
deprecates
On 1/1/2011 5:01 PM, James Wilde wrote:
On Dec 30, 2010, at 18:27 , Larry Gusaas wrote:
I will not support or use LibreOffice
until it stops helping spread OOXML by enabling writing in this file format.
There is absolutely no need to write in this proprietary format. To do so is
contrary to
On 12/30/2010 4:14 PM, BRM wrote:
- Original Message
snip
We need to force MS to support ODF - as others have pointed out ODF is quickly
becoming the world standard at least at the government level - which means in a
few years most organizations that support governments will need to
On 12/29/2010 6:55 PM, Regina Henschel wrote:
Hi,
Tom Hamsher schrieb:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 7:05 PM, RGB ESrgb.m...@gmail.com wrote:
No, not the fontwork gallery but this tool:
http://s2.subirimagenes.com/imagen/5721292fontwork.png
With this very useful tool you can have text following a
On 12/20/2010 6:13 AM, Michael Wheatland wrote:
On 20/12/2010 7:03 PM, Samuel Mehrbrodts.mehrbr...@googlemail.com
wrote:
I think it's good to change the names of the Applications so that they
describe what each application does. LibreOffice is the brand which
will be known and names of the
On 12/18/2010 7:52 AM, Carlo Strata wrote:
Il 18/12/2010 14:21, MiguelAngel ha scritto:
What is critical and impossible?
The associations are with a executable file in a specific path.
No problem for two files with same name in different paths.
No problem to change the association to an
On 12/16/2010 3:45 AM, Cor Nouws wrote:
Benjamin Horst wrote (14-12-10 16:21)
I agree with you about the possible negative connotations of the term
manager, but I think it's just a terminology problem. You could
think of the role as Community Facilitator or even host if you
prefer. The actual
On 12/16/2010 2:40 PM, Johannes A. Bodwing wrote:
Hello,
On 12/16/2010 3:45 AM, Cor Nouws wrote:
Benjamin Horst wrote (14-12-10 16:21)
I agree with you about the possible negative connotations of the term
manager, but I think it's just a terminology problem. You could
think of the role as
On 12/16/2010 3:18 PM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Johannes, Barbara,
Did you have a look at our community bylaws? Most of your points are
addressed there.
Best,
Charles.
snip
Sorry, no -- guess I'd better shut up until I have! :-)
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
On 11/26/2010 12:51 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
I am not trying to hijack this list, but wouldn't it be better to have a list for each language
that we support, if we have users of particular languages they can use that list and not have to
struggle to use English to get help?
(Sorry, but
On 11/26/2010 6:42 PM, Scott Furry wrote:
Try sending a message to discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org. You should very soon get a
confirmation message; replying to that should complete the unsubscribe and you'll get a Goodbye
message. If that doesn't work,
On 11/24/2010 12:27 PM, David Nelson wrote:
Hi, :-)
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 01:27, Carl Symonscarlsym...@gmail.com wrote:
I use LibreOffice, but I don't use an office productivity solution
I'd prefer personal productivity software or personal productivity
package...
0.2 cents.
David Nelson
On 11/23/2010 8:07 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
Hi Robert et al:
Here is the information from Jean Hollis Weber from the documentation team. Jean is one of the
senior leads on the documentation team.
==
Marc, thanks for passing this on.
Some factual info regarding the OOo user
On 11/24/2010 7:00 AM, Michael Wheatland wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
Does Drupal Forums allow one to 'subscribe' (get email notifications) to
both Main Topics/Sections as well as individual threads?
The Drupal messaging/notification
On 11/20/2010 7:39 PM, drew wrote:
On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 16:55 -0500, Lyle Cochran wrote:
From a promotional perspective, I'd use terminology like Migrating
from
Microsoft Office. This provides implicit reinforcement that
migrating to
LibO from MSO is such a common occurrence that we need a
On 11/19/2010 7:16 PM, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
Hi Charles, *
Charles Marcus schrieb:
I'd really like to see an email support list dedicated solely to
questions in the nature of I know how to do this in
Excel/Word/Powerpoint, but how do I do it on Calc/Writer/Impress?...
I'd rather like to
On 11/8/2010 1:57 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:
Hello all,
I'm starting to change the listmail footers of the other mailinglists
according to the on appending this mail.
Does anyone know a good link to mailinglist netiquette or is there
already setup a project related wiki page which can be
On 10/26/2010 1:31 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:
Hi TDF enthusiasts,
I changed the footer for mails of this list.
As requested by several people I added a link to
http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
leading to proven advice how to write mails that will reach a high
chance to be read
On 10/26/2010 4:18 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:
Hi Barbara, *,
Barbara Duprey schrieb:
On 10/26/2010 1:31 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:
Hi TDF enthusiasts,
I changed the footer for mails of this list.
[..]
I'd prefer having a wiki page containing a short 3 step guide
summarizing
On 10/22/2010 11:25 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-10-22 11:38 AM, Barbara Duprey wrote:
OK, then I'm back to my initial position -- since informative responses
can easily come deeper in the thread, this technique (even if it were
supported by the list manager capabilities) would lead
On 10/21/2010 9:52 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-10-20 8:55 PM, Barbara Duprey wrote:
In that regard, the modification of the Reply-To is, I think, more
likely to give a false sense of security than to fix the problem of
people not getting responses they would benefit from.
I totally
On 10/21/2010 12:02 AM, Drew Jensen wrote:
If we had a similar page for OOo, it would make an
enormous difference there, as well.
Why not - http://oucv.org/oooext.html
I did not setup that nabble archive, and can't change settings - if you
back up there to the openoffice level you are
On 10/20/2010 11:50 PM, Drew Jensen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 19:55 -0500, Barbara Duprey wrote:
Howdy Barbara
I don't have anything against forums (though I hope we can avoid having two
top-level ones, as for
OOo, and careful planning is needed in determining the subforums). The main
On 10/19/2010 1:16 AM, James Wilde wrote:
On Oct 19, 2010, at 00:27 , Barbara Duprey wrote:
Does this mean you're a (the?) moderator for this list? Not having that
Delivered-To header definitely does complicate things! I'm amazed that anybody
is posting here unsubscribed at this point, I'd
On 10/18/2010 11:38 PM, Drew Jensen wrote:
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 17:09 +1300, Paul A Norman wrote:
Yep I've had two confirmtatoin that I have left the list and still the
emails come rolling
Does this constitute nuisnace email now?
Paul
Sure - you click on reply to the confirmation emails -
On 10/18/2010 1:24 AM, James Wilde wrote:
On Oct 17, 2010, at 19:54 , Charles Marcus wrote:
...
I do know that the users/discuss lists volume is way too heavy for an
'average user' to get any benefit from. For example, since checking my
email last on Friday evening, there have been 150+ new
On 10/18/2010 1:16 AM, James Wilde wrote:
On Oct 16, 2010, at 00:50 , Barbara Duprey wrote:
...
It is often not clear whether or not the OP is subscribed -- many can't/won't look at the
full headers or filter on them, and sometimes they join the discussion later, when the
header
On 10/17/2010 3:52 AM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi Barbara,
Barbara Duprey wrote on 2010-10-17 03.13:
Are you saying that letting unsubscribed users post to a mailing list
breaks rules? (That may be, but the issue has been discussed to
exhaustion many times and still looks like Lilliput's
On 10/17/2010 10:28 AM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
Barbara Duprey wrote on 2010-10-17 17.25:
I understand, and you have my sympathy :-) -- but don't a lot of those
requests come from people who *subscribed* but still don't understand
how lists work, what they do, what they are for? I see
On 10/15/2010 7:11 PM, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
Hi Barbara,
Barbara Duprey schrieb:
[...]
[Bernhard, I'm not sure you actually saw my post == it's all snipped
here. But I think it's pertinent to some of your points.]
I did - but as I only replied to the main point (in my eyes), I removed
On 10/16/2010 11:56 AM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi Barbara,
Barbara Duprey wrote on 2010-10-16 01.15:
I think if there were a Reply capability in the LibO archive, we could
accomplish most of the task even without automatic support. Either those
of us who already pay attention to whether
On 10/15/2010 11:58 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-10-15 9:58 AM, James Wilde wrote:
On Oct 15, 2010, at 13:43 , Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-10-15 2:18 AM, James Wilde wrote:
Is it possible to add an indication that a message has been
passed by the moderators to the subject line, or as
48 matches
Mail list logo
